ONE SUNNY DAY IN 2005 IN BARCELONA SPIAN. THE NCCMP, MEBCO, AEIP AND THE EBSA DECIDE TO BUILD A SHIT BRIDGE "THE GOETHALS BRIDGE"T0 A SHIT HOLE CALLED STATEN ISLAND.WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT.
IT WAS HERE IN SPAIN THAT THESE GROUP OF ASSHOLES DECIDED TO RAPE PILLAGE AND BURN PENSION CHECKS. THEY HAD BEEN LOOKING INTO IT BUT NOW DECIDED THEY WERE GOING PUBLIC WITH A BLATANT ATTACK ON ERISA
NOW HERE WE GO!!
THEY ALL DO NOT HAVE A CLUE WHAT THEIR DOING SO THEY CALL IN THE EXPERT AUSSIE TEAM AT MAQUARIE WHO ALSO HAD SOME EXPERIENCE BUT WERE HARDLY EXPERTS.
NOW THE UBC FORMS MULTIPLE PARTNERSHIPS WITH MORE TO COME.THE UBC PARTNER WITH MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS I,MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS II AND MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS III.ON JUST ONE FUND ALONE, THE SWRCC PENSION FUND WHICH DOUG MCCARRON AND JOHN DECARLO CONSPIRED TO STEAL FROM EST MIKE MCCARRON AND STEAL THE FUNDS FROM RON SCHEON, MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING HANDED 175 MILLION. LOOK HOW MANY SWRCC EMPLOYEES HAVE BEEN FIRED OR RETIRED. LOOK AT A FEW LOW LIFE SCUM THEY HAVE BROUGHT OUT OF RETIREMENT
NOW HERE WE HAVE THE FAKE COAL MINE SCAM THAT THE SEC CAUGHT MACQUARIE CAPITAL SCREWING INVESTORS. IT IS DECLARED THE REASON MACQUARIE CAPITAL WAS CAUGHT IS BECAUSE THE SEC WAS INVESTIGATING US BACKDOOR COMPANYS THAT ALLOWED CHINESE BUSINESS TO GET IN THE STATES BY PARTNERSHIPS KIND OF LIKE THE ULLICO INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS THE ULLICO BOYS TRAVELED TO CHINA TO OBTAIN IN 2012.AMERICAN INVESTORS ADVISED BY MAJOR LAW FIRMS RAISED THE CAPITAL FROM INVESTORS WHEN THE FRAUD WAS SPELLED OUT IN DOCUMENTS THAT WERE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE IN CHINA MONTHS BEFORE THEY RAISED ANY MONEY. THE NY TIMES SAID THE MOST AMAZING PART WAS HOW EASY IT WAS TO DISCOVER THE FRAUD
SO THE SEC GOES AFTER THE PUDA COAL SCAM AND MACQUARIE CAPITAL.:
NOW IDENTIFIED AS MCUSA(MACQUARIE CAPITAL USA???)
The Complaint On March 27, 2015, the Commission filed a complaint against MCUSA and two individuals, Aaron Black and William F. Fang, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Complaint"), alleging violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act. As discussed below, MCUSA consented to the entry of the Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations made in the Complaint. According to the Complaint, MCUSA was the lead underwriter of a follow-on registered offering of common stock in December 2010 by Puda Coal, Inc. ("Puda Coal"), a Delaware corporation that purported to own a coal company in the People's Republic of China ("PRC"), named the Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd ("Shanxi Coal"). According to the Complaint, in the offering documents, Puda Coal falsely disclosed that it held a 90% ownership stake in Shanxi Coal. Those statements were repeated in the marketing materials for the offering despite the fact that MCUSA had received a report from Kroll Associates Inc. ("Kroll") showing that Puda Coal did not own any part of Shanxi Coal. The Complaint alleges that, according to corporate registry filings in the PRC that Kroll accessed in its due diligence review, Puda Coal's chairman had transferred ownership of Shanxi Coal to himself and then sold nearly half of his interest to the largest state-owned investment firm in the PRC. Hence, at the time of the offering, Puda Coal no longer had any ownership stake in, or source of revenue from, Shanxi Coal
SO WHAT DOES THE SEC DO.
MCUSA IS FINED $15 MILLION AMERICAN DOLLARS BY THE SEC. MCUSA IS TOLD BY THE SEC THAT IT MUST MAKE ALL INVESTORS WHOLE. THEY MUST COME UP WITH A PLAN TO REPAY EVERY PARTY WHO LOST AMOUNT YET TO BE ANNOUNCED AND MCUSA IS DISQUALIFIED FOR 5 YEARS BY THE SEC UNDER RULE 506 (D)(1)..NOW AS A LAYMAN TRYING TO SORT OUT THE 506 RULES I READ THIS "OVERVIEW OF THE BAD ACTOR RULE.RULE 506 (D)(1) PROVIDES THE EXEMPTIONS IN 506(B)AND 506(C) ARE NOT AVAILABLE IF THE COVERED PERSON HAS HAD A DISQUALIFYING EVENT WITH A 5 YEAR LOOK BACK PERIOD
SO NOW IT APPEARS MCUSA CAN APPLY FOR A WAIVER OF THE 5 YEAR SHUT DOWN AND THEY DO. DO THEY APOLOGIZE FOR SCREWING INVESTORS. DO THEY BEG FORGIVENESS FOR ANY PENSION FUND MONEY THEY NOW HAVE TO USE TO PAY THE $15 MILLION AND THE MILLIONS IN MAKE PEOPLE WHOLE PROGRAM. DO THEY OFFER TO TAKE THE MONEY FROM THEIR OWN POCKET??.NO!!!!THEY WHINED AND CRIED!WE PAID 15 MILLION ALREADY. WE HAVE TO PAY BACK INVESTORS AND BOOO F.... HOO HOO
BOO HOO SPEECH
We submit that the impact of Rule 506( d)(l )' s disqualification on MCUSA, its affiliates and its clients today, and over the next five years in the event the waiver is not granted, is grossly disproportionate to the conduct at issue in the Final Judgment- and for which MCUSA has paid $15 million and will fund the costs of a Fair Fund to compensate investors. In light of the limited nature of the violation, the enforcement remedies already obtained by entry of the Final Judgment, and the remedial measures taken since 2011,
BOO HOO SPEECH AND BUY OFF OUR WAIVER FORM THE SEC SPEECH
Sebastian Gomez Abero is the largest infrastructure asset manager in the world and relies on Rule 506 to raise capital in all of its private funds that are marketed to U.S. investors through MCUSA.For example, Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets ("MIRA"), the infrastructure fund management business within Macquarie Asset Management.
WHAT THE BLANK DOES MCUSA HAVE TO DO WITH MAQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE I.MAQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE II OR MAQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE III.
AND!!!! WAIT FOR IT..AND!!! HERE IT COMES!!!
WHAT WE FORGOT TO TELL YOU!!!!
IS THAT MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS III, OUR PARTNERSHIP WITH UNION PENSION FUNDS THAT WE HAVE BEEN SUCKING MONEY OUT OF FOR YEARS NOW.... CAUSE WE IS AN
EXPERT AUSSIE TEAM CONTACTED BY THE UBC FOR US TO SHOW THEM THE PENSION FUND INFRASTRUCTURE SCAM BUSINESS,
MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS III IS SITTING ON $3 BILLION DOLLARS. WE JSUT COMPLETED RAISING $3 BILLION IN 2014 AND I DONT NOW IF ANYBODY TOLD YOU OR NOT BUT WE PLANNED ON USING THAT $3 BILLION TO REBUILD THE GOETHALS BRIDGE WHICH CONNECTS STATEN ISLAND AND NEW JERSEY. IF WE DONT DO IT THE TAX PAYERS WOULD HAVE TO PICK UP THAT BURDEN
NOW HERE WE HAVE THE FAKE COAL MINE SCAM THAT THE SEC CAUGHT MACQUARIE CAPITAL SCREWING INVESTORS. IT IS DECLARED THE REASON MACQUARIE CAPITAL WAS CAUGHT IS BECAUSE THE SEC WAS INVESTIGATING US BACKDOOR COMPANYS THAT ALLOWED CHINESE BUSINESS TO GET IN THE STATES BY PARTNERSHIPS KIND OF LIKE THE ULLICO INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS THE ULLICO BOYS TRAVELED TO CHINA TO OBTAIN IN 2012.AMERICAN INVESTORS ADVISED BY MAJOR LAW FIRMS RAISED THE CAPITAL FROM INVESTORS WHEN THE FRAUD WAS SPELLED OUT IN DOCUMENTS THAT WERE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE IN CHINA MONTHS BEFORE THEY RAISED ANY MONEY. THE NY TIMES SAID THE MOST AMAZING PART WAS HOW EASY IT WAS TO DISCOVER THE FRAUD
SO THE SEC GOES AFTER THE PUDA COAL SCAM AND MACQUARIE CAPITAL.:
NOW IDENTIFIED AS MCUSA(MACQUARIE CAPITAL USA???)
The Complaint On March 27, 2015, the Commission filed a complaint against MCUSA and two individuals, Aaron Black and William F. Fang, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Complaint"), alleging violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act. As discussed below, MCUSA consented to the entry of the Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations made in the Complaint. According to the Complaint, MCUSA was the lead underwriter of a follow-on registered offering of common stock in December 2010 by Puda Coal, Inc. ("Puda Coal"), a Delaware corporation that purported to own a coal company in the People's Republic of China ("PRC"), named the Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd ("Shanxi Coal"). According to the Complaint, in the offering documents, Puda Coal falsely disclosed that it held a 90% ownership stake in Shanxi Coal. Those statements were repeated in the marketing materials for the offering despite the fact that MCUSA had received a report from Kroll Associates Inc. ("Kroll") showing that Puda Coal did not own any part of Shanxi Coal. The Complaint alleges that, according to corporate registry filings in the PRC that Kroll accessed in its due diligence review, Puda Coal's chairman had transferred ownership of Shanxi Coal to himself and then sold nearly half of his interest to the largest state-owned investment firm in the PRC. Hence, at the time of the offering, Puda Coal no longer had any ownership stake in, or source of revenue from, Shanxi Coal
SO WHAT DOES THE SEC DO.
MCUSA IS FINED $15 MILLION AMERICAN DOLLARS BY THE SEC. MCUSA IS TOLD BY THE SEC THAT IT MUST MAKE ALL INVESTORS WHOLE. THEY MUST COME UP WITH A PLAN TO REPAY EVERY PARTY WHO LOST AMOUNT YET TO BE ANNOUNCED AND MCUSA IS DISQUALIFIED FOR 5 YEARS BY THE SEC UNDER RULE 506 (D)(1)..NOW AS A LAYMAN TRYING TO SORT OUT THE 506 RULES I READ THIS "OVERVIEW OF THE BAD ACTOR RULE.RULE 506 (D)(1) PROVIDES THE EXEMPTIONS IN 506(B)AND 506(C) ARE NOT AVAILABLE IF THE COVERED PERSON HAS HAD A DISQUALIFYING EVENT WITH A 5 YEAR LOOK BACK PERIOD
SO NOW IT APPEARS MCUSA CAN APPLY FOR A WAIVER OF THE 5 YEAR SHUT DOWN AND THEY DO. DO THEY APOLOGIZE FOR SCREWING INVESTORS. DO THEY BEG FORGIVENESS FOR ANY PENSION FUND MONEY THEY NOW HAVE TO USE TO PAY THE $15 MILLION AND THE MILLIONS IN MAKE PEOPLE WHOLE PROGRAM. DO THEY OFFER TO TAKE THE MONEY FROM THEIR OWN POCKET??.NO!!!!THEY WHINED AND CRIED!WE PAID 15 MILLION ALREADY. WE HAVE TO PAY BACK INVESTORS AND BOOO F.... HOO HOO
BOO HOO SPEECH
We submit that the impact of Rule 506( d)(l )' s disqualification on MCUSA, its affiliates and its clients today, and over the next five years in the event the waiver is not granted, is grossly disproportionate to the conduct at issue in the Final Judgment- and for which MCUSA has paid $15 million and will fund the costs of a Fair Fund to compensate investors. In light of the limited nature of the violation, the enforcement remedies already obtained by entry of the Final Judgment, and the remedial measures taken since 2011,
BOO HOO SPEECH AND BUY OFF OUR WAIVER FORM THE SEC SPEECH
Sebastian Gomez Abero is the largest infrastructure asset manager in the world and relies on Rule 506 to raise capital in all of its private funds that are marketed to U.S. investors through MCUSA.For example, Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets ("MIRA"), the infrastructure fund management business within Macquarie Asset Management.
WHAT THE BLANK DOES MCUSA HAVE TO DO WITH MAQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE I.MAQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE II OR MAQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE III.
AND!!!! WAIT FOR IT..AND!!! HERE IT COMES!!!
WHAT WE FORGOT TO TELL YOU!!!!
IS THAT MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS III, OUR PARTNERSHIP WITH UNION PENSION FUNDS THAT WE HAVE BEEN SUCKING MONEY OUT OF FOR YEARS NOW.... CAUSE WE IS AN
EXPERT AUSSIE TEAM CONTACTED BY THE UBC FOR US TO SHOW THEM THE PENSION FUND INFRASTRUCTURE SCAM BUSINESS,
MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS III IS SITTING ON $3 BILLION DOLLARS. WE JSUT COMPLETED RAISING $3 BILLION IN 2014 AND I DONT NOW IF ANYBODY TOLD YOU OR NOT BUT WE PLANNED ON USING THAT $3 BILLION TO REBUILD THE GOETHALS BRIDGE WHICH CONNECTS STATEN ISLAND AND NEW JERSEY. IF WE DONT DO IT THE TAX PAYERS WOULD HAVE TO PICK UP THAT BURDEN
THEY BOO HOOED
"If MIRA were to continue to be disqualified from raising capital for its funds over the next five years in reliance on Rule 506, then, once its existing capital is spent, it would be materially impaired in its ability to finance new infrastructure projects,"
SO WITH A WAIVER ON OUR 5 YEAR BAN WE WOULD USE THAT $3 BILLION TO
REBUILD THE GOETHALS BRIDGE AND DID WE TELL YOU WE WOULD PUT UP..NOW WAIT FOR IT!! HERE IT IS!!!!
90% OF THE EQUITY THAT UNDERPINS THE PROJECT.AND THEIRS MORE .iF YOU WAIVE OUR BAN FOR 40 YEARS WE WILL DESIGN,BUILD,FINANCE AND MAINTAIN THE BRIDGE
YES IM NOT KIDDING 40 YEAR CONTRACT WHERE WE WILL DESIGN,BUILD,FINANCE AND MAINTAIN THE BRIDGE
AND 90% OF THE PROJECTS FUNDING FROM MAQUARIES
INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS III(WELL OH YEA THE MONEY WILL BE COMING FROM THE SWRCC PENSION FUND AND OUR OTHER PENSION FUND PARTNERS)
FAKE COAL MINES AND BUYING OF THE SEC.TRADING 5 YEAR BANS FOR ONE WAVIER AND I BRIDGE