IT APPEARS THE SHAPIRO CAMPAIGN MAY BE OVER
Filed order MEDIATION (SML): By July 26, 2023,
appellants shall file either a motion or a stipulation to dismiss these appeals
pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The briefing schedule previously set by the
court is vacated. [12734238] [23-35182, 23-35183, 23-35184] (JMR) [Entered:
06/12/2023 04:25 PM]
FRAP42.VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
(a) Dismissal in the District Court.
Before an appeal has been docketed by the circuit
clerk, the district court may dismiss the appeal on the filing of a
stipulation signed by all parties or on the appellant's motion with
notice to all parties.
(b) Dismissal in the Court of Appeals.
(1) Stipulated
Dismissal. The circuit clerk must dismiss a docketed appeal if the
parties file a signed dismissal agreement specifying how costs are to be
paid and pay any court fees that are due.
(2) Appellant's
Motion to Dismiss. An appeal may be dismissed on the appellant’s motion
on terms agreed to by the parties or fixed by the court.
(3) Other
Relief. A court order is required for any relief under Rule 42(b)(1) or
(2) beyond the dismissal of an appeal—including approving a settlement,
vacating an action of the district court or an administrative agency, or
remanding the case to either of them.
FOR THOSE NOT AWARE THE FEDERAL
COURT DISMISSED THE CASES AGAINST EX EST SHAPIRO AND JUAN SANCHEZ WHICH WERE BS TO START
WITH. KEEP IN MIND MEMBERS DUES MONEY HAS BEEN USED TO FINANCE THESE AND OTHER
PERSECUTION CAMPAIGNS AGAINST UBC MEMBERS.
THE CASES WERE DISMISSED BECAUSE DANNY BOY CROOKED TEETH SHANLEY AND UNION CRIMINAL SYNDICATES LIKE THE UBC HAVE NO RIGHT TO FILE AN LMRDA SECTION 501
CASE IN FEDERAL COURT.
SHANLEY AND MCCARRON USE LMRDA SECTION 501
CASES IN FEDERAL COURT TO PERSECUTE UBC OFFICERS WHO TELL THEM TO EAT S.. AND
WILL NOT DO AS THEY ARE TOLD.THE UBC CASE AGAINST EX EST AL BOND IN ST LOUIS WAS DISMISSED IN FEDERAL COURT FOR THE SAME REASON.
WITH A THREAT TO THIS PERSECUTION TOOL SHANLEY FILED AN APPEAL WITH THE NINTH CIRCUIT
COURT LOOKING FOR A RULING ON WHETHER UNIONS HAVE A RIGHT TO FILE 501 CASES IN
FEDERAL COURT OR IF THEY ARE RESTRICTED TO STATE COURT.
SOMEHOW
IN THE 9TH CIRCUIT THE CASE WAS PUT BEFORE A MEDIATOR.REALLY NOT SURE HOW A MEDIATOR CAN RULE WHETHER A UNION CAN FILE IN FEDERAL COURT OR IS RESTRICTED TO STATE COURT
NOW IT APPEARS A DECISION BY THE 9TH CIRCUIT WILL NOT BE MADE.
INSTEAD AS A SHINING EXAMPLE OF OUR FAILED COURT SYSTEM IT APPEARS THEY PLAYED LETS MAKE A DEAL
THE QUESTION NOW IS WHETHER SHAPIRO HAS BEEN EFFECTIVELY SILENCED. WILL MEMBERS EVER GET TO SEE THE EVIDENCE SHE HAS DECLARED SHE HAS SHOWING IT WAS SHANLEY AND THE UBC INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL SYNDICATE THAT DEMAND THEY SIGN THE CBA WITHOUT MEMBER VOTE, RIG THE CBA VOTES AND CRUSH THE UFCW EFFORT
ANOTHER QUESTION IS WHETHER SHANLEY AND THE UBC WILL TRY TO PERSECUTE SHAPIRO IN STATE COURT
ONE HAS TO WONDER.WHAT ARE THE TERMS OF "THE DEAL" IF THERE IS ONE? HOW WERE THEY ALLOWED TO PLAY "LETS MAKE A DEAL" AT THE 9TH CIRCUIT IF THEY DID?
PERHAPS I HAVE IT ALL WRONG. PERHAPS THE MEDIATOR TOLD SHANLEY HE DID NOT HAVE A SNOWBALLS CHANCE IN HELL SO SHANLEY DECIDED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL.
LETS FIND OUT SHALL WE.
THIS RULING WAS IMPORTANT TO MEMBERS AS IT POTENTIALLY COULD HAVE LIMITED FUTURE PERSECUTION CAMPAIGNS AGAINST UBC MEMBERS USING LMRDA SECTION 501 IN FEDERAL COURTS BY SHANLEY AND THE UBC RATS.
A NEGATIVE RULING BY THE 9TH CIRCUIT COMBINED WITH THE 4 RECENT FEDERAL COURT DISMISSALS WOULD HAVE BEEN A WELL DESERVED BITCH SLAP TO SHANLEY