THE UBC KANGAROO TRIAL SYSTEM

MEMBERS ARE PERSECUTED IN THE UBC BY SECTION 52 AND SECTION 14D OF THE UBC CONSTITUTION OR AS THE MEMBERS KNOW IT "THE KANGAROO TRIAL SYSTEM" IT  HAS BEEN DECLARED IN FEDERAL COURT TO BE "NOT VIABLE"
   
THE SECTION 52 SYSTEM, IN A BLATANT ATTEMPT TO DENY YOU AN ATTORNEY, STATES "THE ACCUSED AND THE ACCUSER MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE TRIAL COMMITTEE IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL (WHO SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE UNITED BROTHERHOOD  )AND SHALL BE ENTITLED TO BE PRESENT AT ALL TIMES WHEN THE TRIAL COMMITTEE IS GIVING EVIDENCE .THIS STIPULATION IS A BLATANT ATTEMPT TO SEE TO IT MEMBERS DO NOT HAVE COUNCIL.HOW MANY CARPENTERS ARE ALSO ATTORNEYS.... BUT.. WOULD THEY BE SO STUPID AS TO DENY AN ATTORNEY THE RIGHT TO JOIN THE UNION TO FURTHER THEIR AIM TO DENY MEMBERS COUNCIL ??

                WATCH AS THEY DO JUST THAT

     


HOW CAN YOU DEMAND MEMBERS CAN ONLY BE DEFENDED BY CARPENTER LAWYERS AND THEN SEE TO IT THEY NEVER EXIST

THE KANGROO SYSTEM ROUTINELY DENIES DUE PROCESS SUCH AS DISCLOSURE SO YOU CAN DEFEND YOURSELF, AS THE LMRDA GUARANTEES, AND YOUR  RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY. THIS TRIAL SYSTEM WAS DECLARED IN NEW YORK SOUTHERN DISTRICT COURT ON 4-3-2013 90cv5722 TO BE A DISMAL FAILURE AND THAT THE SECTION 52 PROCEEDINGS ARE NOT VIABLE
.NOT  LEGALLY CAPABLE TO RULE ON ANYBODY
 
MR WALSH:"And the idea is that the trial committee itself, five rank and file members, is not in a position to decide whether Section 411 of Title 29 has been violated or, indeed, whether  those charges should indeed be considered by the executive committee because they may actually be illegal, that his union free speech rights might have been violated, and that the union might be subject to damages at that point."
THE COURT: I see. So now no counsel unless they ask for counsel?
MR. WALSH: "There is no counsel present in the room.There is no counsel present either for the executive committee or for the trial committee. The chairman under Section 52 has enumerated powers which I believe are deficient, frankly, and it has not taken me long, only a few months now, to develop these reservations about the Section 52 proceedings as being viable.
        
THE SECTION 52 SYSTEM, IN A BLATANT ATTEMPT TO DENY YOU AN ATTORNEY, STATES "THE ACCUSED AND THE ACCUSER MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE TRAIL COMMITTEE IN PERSON OR BY COUNSEL (WHO SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE UNITED BROTHERHOOD  Brotherhood)AND SHALL BE ENTITLED TO BE PRESENT AT ALL TIMES WHEN THE TRIAL COMMITTEE IS GIVING EVIDENCE .THIS STIPULATION IS A BLATANT ATTEMPT TO SEE TO IT MEMBERS DO NOT HAVE COUNCIL.HOW MANY CARPENTERS ARE ALSO ATTORNEYS.... BUT.. WOULD THEY BE SO STUPID AS TO DENY AN ATTORNEY THE RIGHT TO JOINT THE TO FURTHER THEIR AIM TO DENY COUNCIL  UNION??

                WATCH AS THEY DO JUST THAT