THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE IS FALSELY BLAMING THE COVID 19 VIRUS FOR FINANCIAL PROBLEMS AND USING IT AS A TOOL TO COVER FOR THEIR POOR FINANCIAL DECISIONS AND THEIR RAPE OF MEMBERS DUES MONEY
ALREADY UNDER SUBPOENA FROM THE US ATTORNEY IN NJ THE UBC INTERNATIONAL HAS DECLARED IT WOULD NOT BE COLLECTING A $22,817, 602 DEBT FROM ODOM CONSTRUCTION FUNNELED THROUGH THE PLACID INVESTORS SCAM. THIS IS $22 MILLION PLUS OF MEMBERS DUES MONEY DIRTY DOUG GAVE TO THE ODY ODOMS OF JOBSITE STEEL FAME. DIRTY DOUG AND THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE GAVE TO THE ODOMS FOR"OPERATING CAPITAL"??
BUT WAIT!!!NOW LETS CLARIFY.IS NOT ODOM CONSTRUCTION AND JOBSITE STEEL ONE AND THE SAME COMPANY??ALTHOUGH ONE CLAIMS TO BE A PR FAB FACTORY WITH DANNY BOB ODOM AND THE OTHER AN INSTALLATION COMPANY WITH BILLY BOB ODOM
IF THEY ARE NOT ONE AND THE SAME WHY IS THE UBC GIVING MILLIONS OF MEMBER DUES MONEY IN OPERATING CAPITAL TO THE ODIE ODOMS OUTSIDE THE UBC MARKET RECOVERY PROGRAM
THIS LAWSUIT SAYS THEY ARE THE SAME COMPANY
JOBSITE STEEL MANUFACTURING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FRAMECO, INC., a/k/a FRAMECO FRAMING, INC, a/k/a METAL FRAMING INDUSTRIES, LLC, and JOSHUA MENSINGER, Defendants.
SO IF THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE OWNS 100% OF JOBSITE STEEL THEN WHOSE DEBT ARE THEY NOT COLLECTING AND WHOSE DEBT IS NOT COLLECTIBLE??COME NOW YOU DO NOT THINK TWO TENNESSEE SHYTE KICKERS ARE RUNNING THIS SCAM DO YOU.
THE EXCUSE THE UBC CROOKS HAVE TOLD THE FEDS FOR THEM NOT SEEKING TO RECOVER MEMBERS DUES MONEY IS BECAUSE "ODOMS BUSINESS HAS BEEN SEVERELY IMPACTED BY THE CORONA VIRUS PANDEMIC.THE COLLECTIBILITY OF THE LOAN IS UNCERTAIN AT THIS TIME
CLICK TO ENLARGE
I SAY BS.NOTICE THE DOCUMENT SAYS THE LOAN WAS DUE IN FULL FEB 2019 LONG BEFORE THE VIRUS.THE VIRUS HAS NOT BEEN HERE LONG ENOUGH FOR THE COMPANY T TO SUFFER A $22 MILLION DOLLAR IMPACT. THE MAJORITY OF ODOM/JOBSITE STEEL PROJECTS ARE TIED TO THE UBC AND ARE IN AREAS THE UBC HAS PAID POLITICAL HACKS TO KEEP OPEN.
HOW ABOUT
The Company entered into a loan agreement with Odom Construction Systems OCS) in the amount of $6.9 million in 2015. In addition, the Company provided $3.54 and $1.475 million,respectively, in additional working capital funding to OCS during 2016 and 2015. In 2017, the Company provided OCS with capital funding intended to absolve a line of credit guaranteed by UBC. In connection with this transaction, the Company entered into another loan agreement with OCS in the amount of $3.62 million. Additionally, 2017, the Company converted all outstanding accounts receivable between itself and OCS into a note receivable totaling $7.282 million. Notes receivable from OCS at December 31, 2019 and 2018 after principal payments received and allowance for doubtful collections were $-0- and $9,999,003, respectively.
DEAR US ATTORNEY AND OLMS MAKE THE UBC PROVE ODOMS BUSINESS HAS BEEN SEVERELY IMPACTED BY THE CORONA VIRUS PANDEMIC OR ARE THEY JUST DUMPING DEBT UNDER FALSE PRETENSE.
CAN YOU SAY LMRDA AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY!!
$22 MILLION PLUS IN UNCOLLECTED ODOM DEBT AND YET DANNY BOB ODOM AS OF THIS MONTH (APRIL 2020) HAS BEEN PROMOTED TO CEO OF JOBSITE STEEL!!!!
HEY US ATTORNEY AND DOL!!!
SPEAKING OF FRAUD ...THE PLACID INC FILING FOR 2019 STATES THAT "JOBSITE STEEL MAINTAINS A FACILITY IN SPARKS NEVADA".THAT IS A LIE. THE SPARKS FACILITY HAS BEEN CLOSED SINCE THE BEGINNING OF 2019
HERE IS THE SALE OF THE BUILDING ON SPARKS NV
SPEAKING OF FRAUD ...THE PLACID INC FILING FOR 2019 STATES THAT "JOBSITE STEEL MAINTAINS A FACILITY IN SPARKS NEVADA".THAT IS A LIE. THE SPARKS FACILITY HAS BEEN CLOSED SINCE THE BEGINNING OF 2019
HERE IS THE SALE OF THE BUILDING ON SPARKS NV
I would think cancelling the debt because of CoVid, at this point is premature, because we should as members be paid back when everything opens back up in 2 weeks. If the debt can’t be repaid then the loan should have never been made in the first place. If the debt can’t be paid then our Representatives should be suing the Odom’s to force them to sell everything they own to pay us members back. Hey Frank and Doug!! Can you to scumbags guess what Capelli is talking to the Feds about????
ReplyDeleteI would think cancelling the debt because of CoVid, at this point is premature, because we should as members be paid back when everything opens back up in 2 weeks. If the debt can’t be repaid then the loan should have never been made in the first place. If the debt can’t be paid then our Representatives should be suing the Odom’s to force them to sell everything they own to pay us members back. Hey Frank and Doug!! Can you to scumbags guess what Capelli is talking to the Feds about????
ReplyDeleteWhen will douche bag mccarron be held accountable for the BAD $22 million loan to Odom? $22 million could help many carpenter pension programs. It is obvious, the UBC is over-funded! With $700 million in the UBC coffers, mccarron takes unnecessary risks with our money . . . probably a little something on the side for mccarron's troubles . . . not mention, mccarron used UBC member's money to fund a metal stud fabricator/wall paneling factory, which has eliminated many good-paying carpenter jobs, undercutting carpenter collective bargained wages throughout all jurisdictions of the UBC. Nothing for mccarron to worry about, the money is not his to lose!
ReplyDeleteThe DOL and the DOJ must step in immediately to put an end to mccarron's reckless administration, which is throwing away millions our member's dues money . . . money which could be used to shore up weak health and welfare and pension fund programs throughout the brotherhood. The UBC/mccarron makes grants all the time, usually with no return on the investment. Grants to pensions and healthcare programs would be a direct benefit to thousands of struggling carpenter members. THE BLEEDING MUST STOP! THE DOL MUST PUT THE UBC INTO TRUSTEESHIP!
THE CARPENTER'S MEMBERSHIP MUST TAKE A STRONG LOOK AT THIS HISTORICAL CONCEPT OF HAVING A UBC GENERAL OFFICE, WITH A PILE OF UNNECESSARILY, OVER-PAID GENERAL OFFICERS AND STAFF. LOOK AT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY UBC MEMBERS POUR INTO THE UBC'S GENERAL FUND.
ASKS YOURSELF, WHAT REAL BENEFIT DOES THE GENERAL OFFICE PROVIDE CARPENTER MEMBERS? IT IS CLEAR . . . THE GENERAL OFFICE, NOR ITS OFFICERS, REPRESENT OUR MEMBERSHIP ON THE JOB SITE. LET'S KEEP IT SIMPLE, OUR UNION IS ALL ABOUT OUR JOB SITES . . . OUR WAGES; OUR BENEFITS; OUR SAFETY; JOB SITE PROBLEMS, AND THE FUTURE OUR WORKING CAREERS, ARE ALL IN OUR HANDS, NOT THE UBC GENERAL OFFICE.
THIS IS OUR UNION, AND COLLECTIVELY OUR MEMBERSHIP CONTROLS EVERYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH OUR TRADE AND OUR TRADE'S CONDITIONS. WORKING MEMBERS ON EVERY UBC JOB MUST BAND TOGETHER. WORKING MEMBERS ON EVERY UBC JOB SITE MUST BE STEWARDS OF OUR NEGOTIATED LABOR CONDITIONS (YOU DO NOT NEED TO WAIT FOR A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE TO APPOINT ONE OF THEIR STOOGES AS YOUR JOB SITE STEWARD). COLLECTIVELY, MEMBERS SET THE JOB SITE CONDITIONS, AND MEMBERS COLLECTIVELY, ENFORCE THOSE JOB SITE CONDITIONS! ONCE THE WORKING MEMBERSHIP CONTROLS THE JOB SITE . . . THE MEMBERSHIP WILL CONTROL THE UNION!
WE DO NOT NEED ANY OF THESE OVER-PRICED PUCKS. THE CONCEPT OF A UBC GENERAL OFFICE IS ANTIQUATED! TIME TO MOVE FORWARD WITH A BETTER, LESS BUREAUCRATIC ORGANIZATION. IT IS TIME FOR UBC MEMBERS TO TAKE CHARGE OF THIER UNION!
I believe Michael Capelli is under some sort of witness protection he is not too popular with McCarron
ReplyDeleteA Representative form of Union Administration is now, beyond a reasonable doubt, a system that only benefits the “Representatives” and not the dues paying Union members. If I had the chance to restructure the UBC we would not have union member paid Representatives. I would administer the affairs of the Union with professional non-members who are actually qualified to carry out our affairs. All disputes and violations would be handled by the best law firm our money could buy. Stewards would be the Unions key day to day field representatives who are selected by the members from a pool of properly trained and qualified working members who actually understand the Agreement.
ReplyDeleteWe currently pay Representatives a lot more than the average member will ever make to represent us who obviously aren’t up to the task and then on top of them we still have to pay for attorneys who also suck!!! Why not just cut the turds out if the middle and hire the best professionals we can, who have a lawful obligation to represent our best interests, and who can be gotten rid of if they fail to do the job!!
Clearly the system we have is over priced, dysfunctional, unaccountable, and does not work to advance the interests of the working member.
Everything needs to be burned down.
ReplyDeleteGo back to the basics.
The original premise, mission, and principles.
Back to " community oriented locals with members from those communities electing and conducting business im their communities while contributing to the whole but also working to improve their own communities and working within the individual uniqueness of their locales.
1 member. 1 vote.
Then start making changes to accomadate and reflect modernization.
The premise
Of labor at fair wages.
Labor without abusive work conditions or hours without recompense.
Knowledge of ALLLLL aspects of the craft. Competence in ALL disciplines.
There is much more to this but im not arguing the minutiae or semantics.
This only became this way because we let it.
We have the numbers and the power to force ANY and ALL issues if we would return to the veryyyy foreign concept of uniting against ANY and ALL who harm us to include a rogue leader who is killing all of us.
There is 1 doug McCarron.
He is useless and impotent when the rest of us say screw you.
No money. No support gives him noooooo influence or power.
Think of it this way.
Doug is standing on a pic that is hanging over a building.
100 of us are standing on the other side as a counter weight.
If we step off.... Doug falls to his demise.
Its just that simple.
Unite. Professionally, and quietly.
Force change.
McCarron is way too much a pussie to be out on a pic, he was always afraid of heights
ReplyDeleteTo take away our dues is to quietly step off the pick......
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely.
DeleteIt will not be enough because at some point we will have to express what we want... Together.
This is true. But getting what we want from our Union should be contingent upon paying dues. We want one member one vote, the UBC says no way, we say then you get no dues, etc., etc., issue by issue. When we control the payment of dues, we control those that work for that dues money. Right now we don’t control the dues money and how it’s used by our “Representatives” so we have no authority to control or manage what we want, how we want it. The authorisation to allow employers to deduct dues from our gross wages was granted by the members in the past because those members controlled everything. No one would’ve approved paying dues to a Union no longer run by the working members. But here we are. Now it’s time to stop paying dues for representation we don’t get, and to fund a Union none of us working members control. You control the money, you control who depends on the money.
DeleteLet me get this straight.
ReplyDeleteFor almost 7 years we have gone without electing delegates.
For the record. Union meetings are totally rigged to begin with.
Now during a pandemic... 158 decides to hold a town hall election? No rigging there.
I am filing a charge with the omls.
I suggest anyone that gives a shit about trying to hang on to what little union we have left, should do the same.
1. We have approx 4200 mbrs.
2. Even though it is the 21st century .. Not everyone has a phone... Access to a phone ( ie broken or in the midst of changing, or since many are out of work, perhaps behind in a bill) ... Automatically they are disinfranchising members.
2. Until a definitive written list of delegates ( current) and current either phone numbers ( for those that have them) or an address to mail them comments is posted this is all a sham.
3. Holding a town hall phone bank is discriminatory to those wishing to run, by denying them face and body prescence recognition... Leaving many with only the recognition of those currently serving.
To stand and speak to the audience face to face is one of the most critical forms of communication and by depriving the candidate/ member of this opportunity undoubtedly ruins any ability to compete.
Given the nature and total lack of trust for the current leadership... Whats to say that your " call" isnt " accidentally" disconnected?
Ask yourself.
Do you fully trust william sproules?
Do you fully trust mike hand?
Do you fully trust james hocker?
Melio?
Dougherty?
Vinceguerra?
Carsello?
I dont. Based on all ive witnessed for the past 4 years.
Postpone the election until such time that it is warranted to have a meeting face to face.
Citing the ubc statutes and federal law is just another way our leadership is lying. This is an unprecedented event in our lifetimes and there are provisions allowed and will be extended because of the circumstances.
You dont represent us in healthy times... So now you want to hold nominations during a pandemic?
Comn. We are smarter than this.
Most of us.
It seems to me the ubc is taking advantage of the covid crisis to cover a lot of things.
Like bankrupting our council.
Slipping in a dues assesment without member consent.
I assure you. No delegate speaks for me.
You know how i know this?
Because myself and the other 4000 or so members have never been polled or asked.
Prove me wrong.
This is an olms complaint and violation. You know it. Now hopefully more know it.
Ps. How did the contract get " ratified" during the covid?
Was it a done deal before?
Do members not have ANY say in ANYTHING? if not, why am i paying dues?
sprolles is meeting with atorneys dougy beware !!!!!!
ReplyDeleteLets not forget that the EAS Council leader. William Sproules used covid to dissolve the illegal mupps fund.
ReplyDeleteYa know.... The fund that they used to party and golf from.
The fund that never was published with a real amount. Who directed it. Trustees etc etc.
They ( sproules, hand, hocker , brugaras, and others quickly made this slush fund disappear.
Covid ya know.
These mfers , lived, partied, clothed themselves and their friends, bought groceries for their families, gas for their wives cars, drinks, golf outings, and much more .... From a fund that YOU THE MEMBER were bullied and coerced and extorted to pay into.
Lets not forget what it was.
hey sprolles how broke are we i know your sponsoring golf holes all the time and reps are golfing almost everuday of tge wee look what we have became
ReplyDeletePure extortion. From Frank Spencer !!!!!!! Mob tactics will not prevail. A whole lotta of explaining to do now fellows. Great leadership in the eastern Council. Hurry muddy the waters. Boys. Lollollollollol
ReplyDeleteCriminals. Appointing morons to engage in criminal behavior can never end well.
DeleteHand... The walls are closing in.
Hocker.... You have nothing left but to find the bottom of another bottle
Sproules.... Reading " labor law" books written by John Gotti, isnt really a good plan.
Times up. Time to go.
NLRB / bad. Union extortion /good. I se sprolles.
ReplyDeleteIf the feds are looking.
ReplyDeleteThe EAS council is using covid to erradicate a slush/ party fund formerly known as mupps.
Look at how quick that fund dissolved !!! IRS. Ya busy?
Any new IRS agents want a promotion?
Mupps. Follow the money. From NRCC. TO KML. TO EAS.
jersey building trades credit union.
Police and Firemans credit union of nj.
44000 members extorted.
Hey. Ray heineyman. Looks like decathlon and Shanley Are going to get you out of the picture. You really did have a piss poor performance at the nlrb. Are you even sure your a law lawyer ??????? Well it’s been real ray im sure the icing is on the cake your gonna be out. After their program was not able to be properly defended. Not counting all the bad advice you gave the union. Please take it to court. We will make precedent. With every. Union in America. What do you got to lose Doug is already getting rid of you anyway now. Ruin it for all the unions. I double dog dare you. But I smell p——-y. You will sign the settlement like the little bitch you are !
ReplyDeleteKeep in mind.
DeleteKroll / heineman/ carton were retained as lawyers for the savings plan and all eas / philly dealings.
The Mupps is only the tip.
The illegal garnishing of checkoff dues from feb 2016 from nrcc. Key legal point.
This was NOT a merge. That was a DISSOLUTUON.
Every check off due weekly is illegal even through :
1. Dissolution of mrc
2. Hostile takeover by nrccc.
Now. Here is another key LEGAL point.
The nrcc was not " merged" with kml.
That too was a dissolution.
Which for the 2nd time negated any dues structure since they do not have the signatures of cba authority.
The kml was an absorbtion of the floating council.
There is no legal authority for mccarron and intl to get checkoff dues.
The UBC constitution is worthless.
Now its EAS. Stillllll without authority.
Do not think this is not under scrutiny.
NO SHOT RAY !!!!!!
ReplyDeleteSay it so stupid Ray??? Your no longer handling the EAS duties in the same capacity?? Oh I guess you want more family time??? Or is it you lost a massive case and now your persona non grata?? Either way go lay down in traffic while you think about your failed conduct!!!
ReplyDeleteSproules.
ReplyDeleteHand.
Hocker.
Carsello.
This is not going away.
Suggestion.
And a suggestion to you Ray Heineman.
Stop lying to the membership.
Pretty simple.
Stop lying by omission and by deceitful " wordtwerking".
Be open. Serve the members... I guarantee you will see more support.
You have lied to us every day since we were dissolved in 2016.
That may be the jersey leadership model, and we saw the results there.
This is not " your" union.
We pay you. ( far tooo many of you and way to much)
The return of investment is tipping to a point that its absurd.
You will continue to be called out and challenged every step of the way. " U Can" bet on it.
Another meeting of the scab Delegates at the last EAS Council meeting. We work so they can eat, drink, and golf on our dime.
ReplyDelete