YOU ASK ...WHAT IS THE STATUS OF GEORGEY LAUFENBERG
WHILE THE FEDS VS LAUFENBERG CASE IS STILL IN
VIRUS LIMBO NOT SO WITH THE LAUFENBERG VS THE UBC CASE TO RECOVER ALL THE MONEY
FRANKIE SPENCER AND MIKEY CAPELLI SAID GEORGEY COULD HAVE
LAUFENBERG VS NORTHEAST COUNCIL CASE
Case 2:17-cv-01200
US DISTRICT COURT NJ
THE "GIVE ME THE MONEY THAT YOU SAID I COULD TAKE CASE"???
WE WILL TALK ABOUT IT NEXT YEAR.
SAY SEPTEMBER 2021.NOW REMEMBER I SAID....
"TO BE DETERMINED"
PLANS HAVE BEEN MADE
DISCOVERY
Discovery disputes (other than those arising during depositions) shall be brought to the Court’s attention no later than February 28, 2021. The Court will not consider any discovery dispute (other than those arising during depositions) brought to its attention after this date.
V. MOTIONS
12. Any motion to add new parties or amend pleadings, whether by amended or third-party complaint, must be filed not later than February 28, 2021
IV. FUTURE CONFERENCES
7. There shall be a telephone conference before the Undersigned on March 1, 2021
II. DISCOVERY
2. Fact discovery shall remain open through June 1, 2021
VI. EXPERTS
15. All affirmative expert reports shall be delivered by July 9, 2021. Any such report is to be in the form and content as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) (2) (B).
16. All responding expert reports shall be delivered by August 16, 2021. Any such report shall be in the form and content as described above.
Expert discovery, including the depositions of any expert witnesses, shall be
completed on or before September 20, 2021.
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
19. A final pretrial conference shall be conducted pursuant to Civil Rule 16(d) [TO BE DETERMINED].
!!!!!!TO BE DETERMINED!!!!!!.
NOW YOU KNOW WHAT I KNOW
BUT NOT TO WORRY THE BOYS ARE PLAYING
HOW JUICY DO YOU THINK THEY WANT THIS TO GET ON THE RECORD. I MEAN THIS IS NOT THE DOUGY MCCARRON VS SANDY MALONEY CASE
SEEMS ONE STICKING POINT IS THE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT DOES NOT WANT TO PAY.LET US GUESS WHICH INSURANCE COMPANY
SEEMS ALSO GEORGE WANTS TO DEPOSE 35 PEOPLE.I'LL BET THAT HAS THE BOYS CRAPPING IN THEIR DIAPERS AND THEIR GRANNY PANTIES
35 DEPOSITIONS IN A FEDERAL COURT. HELL THEY DON'T WANT GEORGEY TO DEPOSE ANYBODY LET ALONE 35
AND ERISA PREEMPTION.THAT SOUNDS ODDLY FAMILIAR..HEY SPINDLE DICK DECARLO....
YOU AND YOUR CRONIES CAN BUY THE WALKING DEAD BIDEN AND HIS CRONIES
BUT I DO NOT THINK THE EX MAIDEN
HELPS YOUR CASE
McCarron, who in 2010 brought his girlfriend SANDRA MALONEY from Las Vegas to California,gave her a job with CSAC,a $66,000 raise,a UBC vehicle, an apartment in the plush Marina Del Ray and took out his brother for opposing it, LIED to members and at a called to order local Union meeting by declaring"she is not my girlfriend" and "I did not give her the $66,000 Segal did"This was recorded on video.
THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN EDITED DUE TO LANGUAGE
NOTICE:TO SEE THE VIDEO UNEDITED CLICK HERE
"SHES NOT MY GIRLFRIEND"
"Counter Defendants admit that during the dates approximated MALONEY and McCarron had an on and off romantic relationship, and that he was the CEO and a member of CSAC’s Board of Directors"
("During the period from 1992 to 2011, I had an off and on romantic relationship with Douglas McCarron. He is the Chief Executive Office of CSAC and a member of its Board of Directors)
(HEY DOUG HOW DO YOU SPELL A-D-U-L-T-E-R-Y.WERE YOU NOT STILL "MARRIED WITH CHILDREN"WHEN YOU STARTED THIS RELATIONSHIP WITH MALONEY.FOR THE RECORD WAS SANDY MALONEY THE FIRST WOMAN YOU COMMITTED ADULTERY WITH??)
"I DID NOT GIVE HER A RAISE SEGAL DID"
"Counter Defendants admit that McCarron is the CEO of CSAC, a member of its Board of Directors, and the General President of the UBC"
" Counter Defendants admit that CSAC (as well as Counter Complainant) administers the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and has a Board of Directors that is made up of one trustee from different Trusts"
SEGAL COULD APPROVE NO SUCH RAISE FOR SANDRA MALONEY.ONLY THE CEO OF CSAC DOUG MCCARRON AND THE LISTED CSAC BOARD OF DIRECTORS WOULD HAVE APPROVED MALONEYS WAGE AND HER HIRING. JUST AS THEY APPROVED MAKING MALONEY PERMANENT FUND ADMINISTRATOR
ALSO DEAR EBSA AND FEDS. YOU STILL LISTENING?
HEY SPINDLE DICK DECARLO WHO ARE YOU TO ADD ANYBODY TO THE AGENDA FOR CONSIDERATION.YOU ARE NOTHING MORE THAN A HIRED BITCH. YOU ARE NOT A FUND TRUSTEE OR CSAC BOARD MEMBER.
"Counter Defendants admit that John DeCarlo added Milliman to the agenda for consideration for claims auditing"
HEY SPINDLE DICK DECARLO WHO ARE YOU OR CROOKED TEETH SHANLEY TO INFORM SANDRA MALONEY OF ANYTHING,TAKE HER OFFICE KEYS,BUILDING PASS AND ESCORT HER TO HER CAR.YOU ARE NOTHING MORE THAN A HIRED BITCH. YOU ARE NOT A FUND TRUSTEE OR CSAC BOARD MEMBER.
"Except admit that Mr. DeCarlo informed MALONEY that she was being placed on administrative leave with pay and gathered her parking pass, building access pass and office keys.
IN THE LAST FILING BY DECARLO AND SHANLEY IN THE MALONEY CASE DATED 10/15/2020 THESE TWO ASS CLOWNS CONTINUED THEIR MODUS OPERANDI AND FILED MORE FALSE STATEMENTS AND FLAT OUT LIES IN A FEDERAL COURT JUST AS THEY DID IN THE MIKE MCCARRON CASE.HERE WE HAVE YET ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO ATTACK AND DESTROY ANY PERSON WHO EXPOSES DOUG MCCARRON FOR THE SCUM BAG HE IS AND EXPOSES THE UBC FOR THE CRIMINAL SYNDICATE IT IS.
"Counter Defendants admit that the USDOL’s investigation related to the processing of benefits, and MALONEY became fearful that the investigation could result in the discovery of her fraudulently obtaining marital therapy benefits while knowing such benefits were not covered under the plan"
HEY DECALRO YOU LYING DUMB ASS SACK OF SHYTE
"Permitted to participate in a Department of Labor interview"
(1)FOR THE RECORD.WHO WAS THE DOL INTERVIEWING.
(2)FOR THE RECORD WHO DID THE DOL REQUEST TO INTERVIEW.IT MUST HAVE BEEN YOUR LAW FIRM CORRECT??OTHERWISE WHY WERE YOU OR ANY HACK FROM YOUR LAW FIRM THERE??
"IF YOU WERE NOT REPRESENTING MALONEY IN A PERSONAL CAPACITY OR AS A CLIENT OF DECARLO AND SHANLEY"
(3) FOR THE RECORD.HAVE YOU EVER BEEN IN ATTENDANCE AT ANY OTHER MEETINGS/INTERVIEWS WITH UBC EMPLOYEES OR OFFICERS WHEN THE EBSA,OLMS OR IRS HAVE CONDUCTED INTERVIEWS??WHERE YOU NOT IN ATTENDANCE AT THOSE MEETINGS IN THE CAPACITY OF THE UBC LAW FIRM.
ARE YOU DENYING FOR THE RECORD THAT IT IS UBC POLICY TO HAVE UBC COUNSEL PRESENT AT ALL INTERVIEWS/MEETINGS BETWEEN UBC EMPLOYEES AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AS WELL AS AT DEPOSITIONS IN LEGAL CASES BROUGHT AGAINST THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE..
(4)
DIDN'T CHARLIE BOY DAVANT REITERATE TO THE COURT THAT SANDRA WAS "PERMITTED" TO SIT IN ON A DOL MEETING.
"Rather she alleges that she was permitted to participate in a Department of Labor interview"
DEAR DOL PAY ATTENTION
YOU NOW CLAIM SANDRA MALONEY MAY HAVE "LIED TO THE DOL"
"Counter Defendants cannot say that MALONEY gave truthful testimony during the investigation"
AS AN OBSERVER AND NOT THE PURPOSE OF THE"INTERVIEW"WHY WOULD SANDRA MALONEY BE FEARFUL OF ANYTHING. AS AN OBSERVER AND NOT THE PURPOSE OF THE"INTERVIEW"WHY WOULD SANDRA MALONEY BE QUESTIONED OR HAVE HAD ANY OPPORTUNITY TO LIE TO THE DOL???WHAT "TESTIMONY" ARE YOU REFERRING TO??
"Counter Defendants admit that MALONEY participated in a USDOL interview, and deny that she was represented in a personal capacity by or a client of DeCarlo & Shanley"
SPINDLE DICK DECARLO YOU ARE A LYING SACK OF SHYTE
HOW WOULD YOU KNOW WHAT MALONEY BECAME FEARFUL OF.DO YOU HAVE ESP. WHY WOULD MALONEY BE:
"fearful that the investigation could result in the discovery of her fraudulently obtaining marital therapy benefits"
THE MARITAL THERAPY BENEFITS PAYMENT WAS NOT AN ISSUE AT THE TIME AND ONLY BECAME ONE WHEN YOUR SKANKY ASS NEEDED GARBAGE TO TRY AND MISLEAD THE FEDERAL COURT WITH.
WHY WAS THE MARITAL
THERAPY BENEFITS ISSUE NOT INCLUDED IN YOUR INITIAL BRIEF CONTAINING YOUR ALLEGATIONS AGAINST MALONEY FILED ON 4/3/2020??
YET NOW ON 10/15/2020 YOU CLAIM NOT ONLY WAS MALONEY AFRAID THE DOL MIGHT DISCOVER THE MARITAL THERAPY PAYMENT BUT IT IS ALSO THE REASON SHE REFUSED TO ALLOW MILLIMAN
(DON'T WORRY SPINDLE DICK. THE COURT WILL KNOW EXACTLY WHAT MILLIMANS PURPOSE IS AND WHY DOUGY BECAME SO PISSED WHEN THEY WERE NOT INCLUDED)
NOT A WORD ABOUT PAYMENTS FOR "MARITAL THERAPY" IN YOUR INITIAL ATTACK ON MALONEY IN RETALIATION FOR EXPOSING THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE AND FOR EXPOSING DIRTY DOUG FOR THE SCUM BAG HE IS. YET IN THIS RECENT BRIEF YOU CLAIM NOT ONLY WAS MALONEY AFRAID THE DOL WOULD FIND OUT ABOUT IT BUT YOU NOW ALSO CLAIM IT IS THE REASON SHE REFUSED MILLIMAN.BS
TELL US ALL CROOKED TEETH AND SPINDLE DICK. WHAT WOULD THE PENALTY BE IF THE DOL OR MILLIMAN DID DISCOVER A MARITAL BENEFIT PAYMENT THAT WAS NOT ALLOWED. CAREER ENDING.FIDUCIARY BREACH CHARGES?? IN YOUR ASS.NOT A DAMN THING AND MALONEY HAD NOTHING TO BE FEARFUL OF OVER SUCH PETTY BS.
THE SOUTHWEST FUND TRUSTEES ROBBED THE APPRENTICESHIP FUND FOR OVER $200,000 FOR LAVISH PARTY'S AND NONE OF THEM WERE CHARGED OR REMOVED.ALL THE SOUTHWEST FUND TRUSTEES FAILED IN THEIR DUTYS AS FIDUCIARYS TO CONDUCT A REVIEW OF LEASES EVERY THREE YEARS AND COST THE FUND OVER $5 MILLION.
GEORGE LAUFENBERG IS ALLEGED TO HAVE LOOTED THE NORTHEAST FUNDS AND THE UBC HAS NOT FILED CHARGES WITH THE EBSA
THE UBC HAS REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE THE ALLEGED CORRUPTION BY FRANK SPENCER AND MIKE CAPELLI
YOU KNOW SPINDLE DICK IT IS TIME FOR EITHER LEGAL CENSOR FOR YOUR FALSE STATEMENTS IN FEDERAL COURT
OR
PERHAPS IT IS TIME FOR YOUR OLD WRINKLY ASS TO PAY A VISIT TO YOUR PAL DR. SCARY HACKENSTEIN
TO FIND OUT WHY YOU ARE SUCH A LYING SACK OF SHYTE.TAKE LITTLE DANNY BOY SHANLEY WITH YOU. I AM SURE YOU CAN BORROW A BOOSTER SEAT FOR THE RIDE
HEY EBSA IS ANY OF THIS LEGAL??
"Counter Defendants are informed and believes and, on that basis, admit that CSAC was created to administer various ERISA trust funds funded by employer contributions"
"Counter Defendants are informed and believes and, on that basis, admit that CSAC was created to administer various ERISA trust funds funded by employer contributions"
"Counter Defendants admit that CSAC (as well as Counter Complainant) administers the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and has a Board of Directors that is made up of one trustee from different Trusts"
(1) UNDER ERISA IS THE UNION INTERNATIONAL PRESIDENT ALLOWED TO CREATE AN ENTITY TO SEIZE CONTROL OF THE SOUTHWEST FUNDS AND NAME HIMSELF THE CEO OF THIS ENTITY?
(2) UNDER ERISA IS THIS UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE ALLOWED TO ELIMINATE ALL THE SEATED TRUSTEES WHO HAVE A FIDUCIARY DUTY UNDER ERISA AND ALLOW A SELF PROCLAIMED CEO AND TWO TRUSTEES MAKE ALL DECISIONS FOR THE MULTIPLE SOUTHWEST FUNDS
SHALL WE GO ON.....
IN THE MONTHS LEADING UP TO THE RECENT VIRTUAL CONVENTION/ELECTION SCAM MCCARRON PULLED ON UBC MEMBERS THE MCCARRON CRIMINAL SYNDICATE EXTORTED UBC MEMBERS ACROSS THE COUNTRY
THE DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON CRIMINAL SYNDICATE USED DESIGNATED UBC EMPLOYEES TO COERCE AND BULLY UBC OFFICERS(BOTH LEGALLY ELECTED AND ILLEGALLY APPOINTED MCCARRON SUCK ASS) INTO CONTRIBUTING AT LEAST $100 TO HIS REELECTION CAMPAIGN
THOSE THAT REFUSED WERE HARASSED AND PRESSURED BY THE DESIGNATED BAG MEN WHO WERE COLLECTING FOR MCCARRONS CRIMINAL SYNDICATE WHILE ON THE UBC TIME CLOCK.THE MCCARRON DESIGNATED "COLLECTOR" INSINUATED RETALIATION FOR THOSE WHO REFUSED TO CONTRIBUTE.
DESPITE DECLINING TO CONTRIBUTE AND INFORMING THEIR COUNCIL LEADERS THAT THEY WERE BEING HARASSED AND EXTORTED THE COUNCIL LEADERS, THE MAJORITY WHO ARE MCCARRON SUCK ASS AND HAND PICKED MEMBERS OF THE MCCARRON CRIMINAL SYNDICATE, REFUSED TO STOP THE EXTORTION OR INVESTIGATE. INSTEAD THOSE BEING EXTORTED WERE ADVISED TO "PAY UP"
DESPITE INFORMING THE MCCARRON GANGS "COLLECTOR" THAT THEY WERE NOT CONTRIBUTING THESE TARGETS OF THE MCCARRON GANG WERE VISITED MULTIPLE TIMES WITH A DEMAND FOR PAYMENT.EACH TIME THE DEMAND WAS LESS CORDIAL AND THE COLLECTOR WAS MORE PANICKED OVER THE REFUSALS.SOME MEMBERS ENDED UP PAYING JUST TO STOP THE VISITS AND HARASSMENT
SO OLMS AND US ATTORNEY I ASK YOU. IS THIS NOT EXTORTION??
SO OLMS AND IRS I ASK YOU.DID MCCARRON FILE DOCUMENTATION TO ACCOUNT FOR THESE EXTORTED PAYMENTS
SO MULTIPLE FEDERAL AGENCY'S IS THERE PROOF OF THIS EXTORTION. YOU BET. HOW ABOUT PAPER AND TEXT MESSAGES TO COUNCIL LEADERS COMPLAINING OF THE EXTORTION ATTEMPTS
IS THIS EXTORTION CAMPAIGN BY THE MCCARRON GANG UNIQUE TO THIS VIRTUAL CONVENTION SCAM AND BS ELECTION OR BUSINESS AS USUAL BY THE MCCARRON GANG
ONGOING PATTERN OF CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR???
Alan Wasdahl was an elected delegate to the Carpenters Convention. In what follows he reports on his experience at the recent Las Vegas Convention. Note: Opinions expressed in the $100 Plus Club News are solely those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Association for Union Democracy.
Prior to the Convention I was approached by one of
the paid staff from my local union and asked if I would like to make a
financial contribution to the re-election campaign of the McCarron slate.
I was shown a letter from Doug McCarron asking for the support of this
individual in recruiting the support of others in my area. One has to
assume that this kind of recruiting was being done throughout the organization.
I asked how much he had to kick in - being paid staff -- and I was told
that he had made a $100 contribution. I hesitated for a moment, and was
then told that all of the other delegates from my local union were already
on board. I declined his offer, stating that I felt an obligation to hear
from all of the candidates -- before making my decision.
At the convention, numerous reports from different parts of the country
began to surface indicating that the $100 level of contribution for staff
members was the apparent standard or "expected" campaign donation.
Imagine being on the union payroll as either a Business Representative or Organizer, and then being approached by your Boss and asked for a financial contribution? Would this make you feel a little uneasy?
Can you imagine anyone on the payroll not having the common sense to make a "voluntary" campaign contribution for their Boss's re-election campaign? Would such a contribution be by definition -- a good career choice decision?
Listed on "The McCarron Team" campaign literature appears roughly 2,500 names. If the going "contribution" rate was $100 for each name, this would represent political campaign funds of $250,000 going towards their re-election efforts.
Carpenter Union District Councils throughout the land are run by Administrative Assistants who report directly to the General President, Doug McCarron. These Administrators have the authority to hire and fire union Business Representatives and Organizers. Do you believe that if anyone declined to make such a contribution that they would still have their job next month? Maybe yes, maybe no -- after all, I'm just asking the question. What do you think? All I know, is that the names of every paid staff person from my area are on the list.
Then, on the day of nominations, campaign shirts for the "McCarron Team" were given to delegates and guests as they entered the convention hall. The shirts were bright orange in color. As I entered onto the convention floor, there was a sea of orange. I'd estimate that a good 70% of the crowd was wearing these shirts. While entering the convention hall, I bumped into a few delegates-- these were working carpenters who were walking against the flow of people and heading back towards the lobby. When I asked them where they were going, they leaned in towards me, and softly said, "We were told by someone on staff that we had better get some orange shirts and to put them on." And yet, another level of commitment -- a public display of one's (political) affection.
Based strictly upon a carpenter's own achievements and character - without an endorsement of the powers that be - how can any one carpenter expect to stand a fair chance at running for office against such a stacked deck?
Well, with all of the orange shirts, campaign literature, banners, buttons and balloons - I'm sure it all cost a pretty penny -- maybe even upwards of $50,000. Which would still leave about $200,000 in reserves for next time?
It is said that about 85% of the elected delegates are paid staff. Understand that these positions are appointed. There is no real job security; therefore, while job performance may certainly be a top priority, so is doing whatever keeps your Boss happy - and this should be of concern to us all. Our union is increasingly run from the top down, rather than by traditional means. Communication tends to be one way only. Our leadership does not promote open communications amongst the members and seldom are the concerns of working carpenters represented by their Business Reps. and taken up the ladder. Make no mistake, this is an erosion of trade union democracy.
SO I WILL ASK AGAIN:
(1)IS THIS NOT PLAIN OLD EXTORTION.(2)HAS MCCARRON FILED DOCUMENTATION WITH THE IRS SHOWING THESE COLLECTIONS,HOW THE MONEY WAS SPENT AND WHERE ARE THE "RESERVES"?
(3) DESPITE ALL THE INFORMATION PROVIDED TO MULTIPLE AGENCIES OVER THE YEARS WHY AS OF NOVEMBER 1,2020 IS MCCARRON AND THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE STILL IN BUSINESS
LMRDA VIOLATIONS
NLRA VIOLATIONS
ILLEGAL EXPENDITURES FROM AND CONTROL OF ERISA FUNDS
MULTIPLE ERISA VIOLATIONS
SELF DEALING
TAX FRAUD
MONTH LONG UNION MEETINGS IN HAWAII
SEXUAL HARRASMENT
DUMMY COMPANYS
WHEN WILL IT STOP!!!
WHEN WILL THEIR BE JUSTICE!!!