DIRTY DOUG HAS BEEN SUED BY UBC MEMBER JOHN GOULD FOR ALLOWING ALBERT BOND, WHO WAS YET ANOTHER OF HIS HAND PICKED EST'S, TO ROB UBC MEMBERS. MCCARRON HAS BEEN SUED FOR HIS REFUSAL TO STOP THE CORRUPTION DESPITE BEING GIVEN PROOF OF THE CORRUPTION OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS
"I filed these yesterday with exhibits as a Pro Se litigant. It’s a
501(a) derivative action on behalf of the members; with Doug McCarron as
the defendant. He knew, and allowed, Nelson, Bond, and others to
convert union funds to their personal use since at least September of
2014. Bond was a snake, but McCarron fed him. They should share in the
responsibility of covering the member’s losses. I’ve basically chosen to
beat McCarron to the 501(a) punch. I don’t see a federal judge allowing
the union to intervene a second time. Especially after the union’s
intervention on Bond’s behalf was nothing more than a coverup. With the
UBC admitting only months later that Bond was removed for the “financial
malfeasance” that everyone, including Blitz-Bardgett, claimed wasn’t
occurring. The case number is 4:22-cv-00255-jch. "
VIEW THE ENTIRE COMPLAINT HERE:
(MOUSE OVER THE WORD ABOVE AND CLICK ON THE LINK)
SEE THE VERIFIED APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE HERE:
(MOUSE OVER THE WORDS ABOVE AND CLICK ON THE LINK)
DIRTY DOUG AND HIS UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE HAVE NOT ONLY REFUSED TO REMOVE THESE CROOKS AND STOP THE CORRUPTION THEY WORKED TO KEEP THESE CROOKED OFFICERS IN PLACE AS ALONG AS THEY DID AS MCCARRON DIRECTED
DESPITE HAVING BEEN GIVEN INFORMATION FOR YEARS REGARDING EST EVELYN SHAPRIO'S CORRUPTION MCCARRON REFUSED TO ACT. DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON WORKED TO KEEP HER IN OFFICE. IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE UBC REPS AT THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST COUNCIL JOINED THE UFCW AND SHAPRIO WAS NOT ABLE TO CRUSH MEMBER DISSENT FORCED MCCARRON TO STEP IN DID HE ACT.NOTICE THERE HAS BEEN NO FEDERAL CASE FILED AGAINST SHAPIRO
DESPITE HAVING BEEN GIVEN INFORMATION FOR YEARS REGARDING EST TERRY NELSONS CORRUPTION MCCARRON REFUSED TO ACT. DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON WORKED TO KEEP HIM IN OFFICE. IT WAS NOT UNTIL TERRY NELSON REFUSED TO DO AS MCCARRON DIRECTED AT THE ST LOUIS COUNCIL DID HE ACT.
HE REPLACED HIM WITH THE NOW ACCUSED CROOK EST ALBERT BOND
DESPITE HAVING BEEN GIVEN INFORMATION FOR YEARS REGARDING EST MIKE FORDES CORRUPTION,MOB CONNECTIONS AND DRUG USE MCCARRON REFUSED TO ACT. DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON WORKED TO KEEP HIM IN OFFICE. IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE FEDS AND US ATTORNEY STEPPED IN AND PUT MIKE FORDE IN PRISON THAT HE WAS REMOVED FROM THE NYC DISTRICT COUNCIL
DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON ATTACKED AND REMOVED EST JOHN BALLANTYNE AND THEN SEIZED THE NORTHEAST COUNCIL IN A PHONY TRUSTEESHIP BECAUSE BALLANTYNE EXPOSED HIS CROOKED PALS FRANKY "THE CHIMP" SPENCER AND MIKEY "CHEAP SUITS" CAPELLI AS WELL AS THEIR PAL GEORGE LAUFENBERG.
CRIMINAL CHARGES WERE FILED AGAINST LAUFENBERG AND HE IS STILL BEFORE THE COURT.DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON HAS REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE THE ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTION AGAINST FRANKY THE CHIMP AND MIKEY CHEAP SUITS. INSTEAD HE PROMOTED THEM WITHIN THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE
DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON ATTACKED AND REMOVED EST MIKE MCCARRON AND THEN SEIZED THE SOUTHWEST COUNCIL IN A PHONY TRUSTEESHIP BECAUSE MIKE MCCARRON REFUSED TO DO AS HE WAS TOLD. MIKE MCCARRON WAS A THREAT TO THE MILLIONS IN LEGAL FEES MEMBERS HAVE PAID TO DIRTY DOUGS CROOKED LAW FIRM EACH YEAR.
DEAR JUDGE.HOW MUCH MORE PROOF DO YOU REQUIRE FOR A CONVICTION UNDER 501 OF THE LMRDA. LET US KNOW IF YOU REQUIRE IT. WE HAVE IT
DEAR DOUG LETS HOPE THIS IS YOUR NEXT GIG AS A PRISON BEETCH
Well done and great work!!! Anyone want to file a RICO suit??
ReplyDeleteAll these years and proof of allegations and still the GP Douglas McCarron is in charge. Goes to show you how much protection the working man has especially with the laws and departments that were created. DISGUSTING , DOL, LMNRA, FISA AND PAST EST’s and LEADERS.
ReplyDeleteOne Union Brother John Gould has the balls to stand up to these CROOKS. Way to go John.
McCarron’s corrupt leadership has only made it this far because no members have taken the kind of action that brother Gould has, and that is to file suit in Federal Court. Sure many of us have expressed our discontent in many ways but very few if any have done what John Gould has done. Great work!!!
ReplyDeleteDoug is screwed here because now he is going to have try and do the impossible which is to prove that he’s not a criminal. Doug you’d have a better chance at being hired above board as Journeyman Carpenter, working for a signatory contractor, than convincing anyone your not guilty as charged.
What’s the one thing Doug fears more than death?? Discovery. What’s coming next?? Discovery!!!
Now to all you Council Reps, take head, your day is coming, you will not make it to retirement to sail off into the sunset like so many of your fellow dirt bag Reps. No employer wants to hire an overweight slob who can only talk about work he can’t do now or in the past. Your a bum and no one wants a bum!!
In closing, change is coming, change is coming.
Change is coming.
ReplyDeleteGould has a strong case.
It is unavoidable given the nature of his data, evidence, and proper process of exhausting the appropriate channels ...
He is not only putting McCarron on " trial" ... But at least 4 fed agencies that have been corrupted.
Would it help if many of us out there who have had documentation to similar encounters with olms and lmdra?
Also.
There was a signed letter by members demanding an investigation into the spencer capelli issue.
Would that help to further prove that doug disregarded a member inquiry per the ubc constitution?
Just asking ?
It wouldn’t hurt!! It would be especially helpful if someone filed the same suit here in Philly regarding the misuse of members funds, theft of funds, etc., going back to the dissolution of the MRC.
DeleteI would financially support the filing of such a lawsuit. It’s hard enough to win a one front war, it’s almost impossible to win a two front war!!!
Let’s open up the second front……
Change is coming.
It wouldn’t hurt!! It would be especially helpful if someone filed the same suit here in Philly regarding the misuse of members funds, theft of funds, etc., going back to the dissolution of the MRC.
DeleteI would financially support the filing of such a lawsuit.
It’s hard enough to win a one front war, it’s almost impossible to win a two front war!!!
Let’s open up the second front……
Change is coming.
Could an est having a secreatary having a council car paid for by the members be considered breach of fiduciary duty If you sit on the board and use members money to pay for a secreatary for yourself you fat pos. Just wondering ???? Billy boy
ReplyDeletefile the charge with olms is should be rather easy to prove with a few subponeas
ReplyDeleteshould be easy file with olms. and lets find out if members should be paying for it
ReplyDeleteYou are correct that it SHOULD be easy ... But having done so it is way more difficult than you think.
DeleteEspecially under a democrat admin.
The " agents" and personnell at these agencies will do everything in their power to make it difficult.
Be ready to be relentless.
It is by design that on your 1st phone call ... They will try to discourage you.
Get their emails.
Then formally write your complaint.
Be sure to CC every agency to include the DOL. DOJ and IRS.
Soo.
Olms.
Cc. Dol, nrlb, lmdra, Doj, irs.
Regardless if it is their venue ( which it is) each agency should be put on notice with a trackable " papertrail" ...keep every correspondence on a hard copy in a file.
Prepare to be stonewalled.
Make sure you do due diligence in exhausting all remedy per the ubc constitution and by laws.
Keep allll of those letters.
Forward all of those letters systematically showing your efforts.
It should be easy. It isnt by design.
They want you to give up.
cars for everyone the it guy fat napkin scab teddekin. nothing to se here fellows. I'm spending your dues money wisely est sprolles is keeping his people mighty fat of the working members dues money.
ReplyDeleteTricia mueller Troy singleton
ReplyDeleteFrom reading the filing... It would seem that if it is legally prosecuted and executed lawfully... It should be the end of McCarron.
ReplyDeleteBarring corruption and other influences... And it should be.
The removal of Douglas J McCarron would be one step in a long process of cleaning out the corruption that has ... In many cases.. Punished its members and has NOT acted on the interest of members for a long time. If you are not sure... Just go back to the point where the rank and file no longer elected or chose their representatives.
Start their. Circa 1994 convention.
It was all downhill from there.
No voice. No vote. No accountability with zero representation... Look where we are.
Look at their personal wealth.
There is a direct correlation.