Pages

BROTHER HOOD OR A BUST THE UBC

Pages

Thursday, March 03, 2022

DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON SUED FOR FIDUCIARY BREACH AND VIOLATION OF SECTION 501 OF THE LMRDA

 DIRTY DOUG HAS BEEN SUED BY UBC MEMBER JOHN GOULD FOR ALLOWING ALBERT BOND, WHO WAS YET ANOTHER OF HIS HAND PICKED EST'S,  TO ROB UBC MEMBERS. MCCARRON HAS BEEN SUED FOR HIS REFUSAL TO STOP THE CORRUPTION DESPITE BEING GIVEN PROOF OF THE CORRUPTION OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS

STATEMENT FROM JOHN GOULD


"I filed these yesterday with exhibits as a Pro Se litigant. It’s a 501(a) derivative action on behalf of the members; with Doug McCarron as the defendant. He knew, and allowed,  Nelson, Bond, and others to convert union funds to their personal use since at least September of 2014. Bond was a snake, but McCarron fed him. They should share in the responsibility of covering the member’s losses. I’ve basically chosen to beat McCarron to the 501(a) punch. I don’t see a federal judge allowing the union to intervene a second time. Especially after the union’s intervention on Bond’s behalf was nothing more than a coverup. With the UBC admitting only months later that Bond was removed for the “financial malfeasance” that everyone, including Blitz-Bardgett,  claimed wasn’t occurring. The case number is 4:22-cv-00255-jch.  "

 

VIEW THE ENTIRE COMPLAINT HERE:

COMPLAINT 

(MOUSE OVER THE WORD ABOVE AND CLICK ON THE LINK)

 

SEE THE VERIFIED APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE HERE:

LEAVE TO FILE 

(MOUSE OVER THE WORDS ABOVE AND CLICK ON THE LINK)

 

DIRTY DOUG AND HIS UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE HAVE NOT ONLY REFUSED TO  REMOVE THESE CROOKS AND STOP THE CORRUPTION THEY WORKED TO KEEP THESE CROOKED OFFICERS IN PLACE AS ALONG AS THEY DID AS MCCARRON DIRECTED

 

DESPITE HAVING BEEN GIVEN INFORMATION FOR YEARS  REGARDING EST EVELYN SHAPRIO'S CORRUPTION  MCCARRON REFUSED TO ACT. DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON WORKED TO KEEP HER IN OFFICE. IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE UBC REPS AT THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST COUNCIL JOINED THE UFCW AND SHAPRIO WAS NOT ABLE TO CRUSH MEMBER DISSENT FORCED MCCARRON TO STEP IN DID HE ACT.NOTICE THERE HAS BEEN NO FEDERAL CASE FILED AGAINST SHAPIRO



DESPITE HAVING BEEN GIVEN INFORMATION FOR YEARS  REGARDING EST TERRY NELSONS CORRUPTION  MCCARRON REFUSED TO ACT. DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON WORKED TO KEEP HIM IN OFFICE. IT WAS NOT UNTIL TERRY NELSON REFUSED TO DO AS MCCARRON DIRECTED AT THE ST LOUIS COUNCIL DID HE ACT.

HE REPLACED HIM WITH THE NOW ACCUSED CROOK EST ALBERT BOND

 

DESPITE HAVING BEEN GIVEN INFORMATION FOR YEARS  REGARDING EST MIKE FORDES  CORRUPTION,MOB CONNECTIONS AND DRUG USE MCCARRON REFUSED TO ACT. DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON WORKED TO KEEP HIM IN OFFICE. IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE FEDS AND US ATTORNEY STEPPED IN AND PUT MIKE FORDE IN PRISON THAT HE WAS REMOVED FROM THE NYC DISTRICT COUNCIL



LETS NOT FORGET THE DAY FORDE WAS ARRESTED HE WAS COMING BACK FROM A UBC EVENT IN NOVA SCOTIA WHERE HE SPENT TWO WEEKS WITH DIRTY DOUG AND FRANKY THE CHIMP SPENCER.THAT IS OF COURSE MINUS THE DAYS HE LEFT AND WENT TO STAY IN LUXURY ROOMS AND ATE $1000 MEALS IN SARATOGA SPRINGS NY FOR  THE SARATOGA FLAT TRACK MEET

 

DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON ATTACKED AND REMOVED EST JOHN BALLANTYNE AND THEN SEIZED THE NORTHEAST COUNCIL IN A PHONY TRUSTEESHIP BECAUSE BALLANTYNE EXPOSED HIS CROOKED PALS FRANKY "THE CHIMP" SPENCER AND MIKEY "CHEAP SUITS" CAPELLI AS WELL AS THEIR PAL GEORGE LAUFENBERG.

CRIMINAL CHARGES WERE FILED AGAINST LAUFENBERG AND HE IS STILL BEFORE THE COURT.DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON HAS REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE THE ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTION AGAINST FRANKY THE CHIMP AND MIKEY CHEAP SUITS. INSTEAD HE PROMOTED THEM WITHIN THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE


DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON ATTACKED AND REMOVED EST MIKE MCCARRON AND THEN SEIZED THE SOUTHWEST COUNCIL IN A PHONY TRUSTEESHIP BECAUSE MIKE MCCARRON REFUSED TO DO AS HE WAS TOLD. MIKE MCCARRON WAS A THREAT TO THE MILLIONS IN LEGAL FEES MEMBERS HAVE PAID TO DIRTY DOUGS CROOKED LAW FIRM EACH YEAR.


DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON SPENT HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF MEMBERS MONEY TO WAGE A PERSECUTION CAMPAIGN OF LIES AND PHONY ALLEGATIONS IN A FEDERAL COURT TO TAKE OUT MIKE MCCARRON


DEAR JUDGE.HOW MUCH MORE PROOF DO YOU REQUIRE FOR A CONVICTION UNDER 501 OF THE LMRDA. LET US KNOW IF YOU REQUIRE IT. WE HAVE IT


 DEAR DOUG LETS HOPE THIS IS YOUR NEXT GIG AS A PRISON BEETCH



13 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:41 PM

    Well done and great work!!! Anyone want to file a RICO suit??

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:38 PM

    All these years and proof of allegations and still the GP Douglas McCarron is in charge. Goes to show you how much protection the working man has especially with the laws and departments that were created. DISGUSTING , DOL, LMNRA, FISA AND PAST EST’s and LEADERS.
    One Union Brother John Gould has the balls to stand up to these CROOKS. Way to go John.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous6:41 PM

    McCarron’s corrupt leadership has only made it this far because no members have taken the kind of action that brother Gould has, and that is to file suit in Federal Court. Sure many of us have expressed our discontent in many ways but very few if any have done what John Gould has done. Great work!!!

    Doug is screwed here because now he is going to have try and do the impossible which is to prove that he’s not a criminal. Doug you’d have a better chance at being hired above board as Journeyman Carpenter, working for a signatory contractor, than convincing anyone your not guilty as charged.

    What’s the one thing Doug fears more than death?? Discovery. What’s coming next?? Discovery!!!

    Now to all you Council Reps, take head, your day is coming, you will not make it to retirement to sail off into the sunset like so many of your fellow dirt bag Reps. No employer wants to hire an overweight slob who can only talk about work he can’t do now or in the past. Your a bum and no one wants a bum!!

    In closing, change is coming, change is coming.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:58 AM

    Change is coming.
    Gould has a strong case.
    It is unavoidable given the nature of his data, evidence, and proper process of exhausting the appropriate channels ...
    He is not only putting McCarron on " trial" ... But at least 4 fed agencies that have been corrupted.

    Would it help if many of us out there who have had documentation to similar encounters with olms and lmdra?
    Also.
    There was a signed letter by members demanding an investigation into the spencer capelli issue.

    Would that help to further prove that doug disregarded a member inquiry per the ubc constitution?

    Just asking ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:49 PM

      It wouldn’t hurt!! It would be especially helpful if someone filed the same suit here in Philly regarding the misuse of members funds, theft of funds, etc., going back to the dissolution of the MRC.

      I would financially support the filing of such a lawsuit. It’s hard enough to win a one front war, it’s almost impossible to win a two front war!!!

      Let’s open up the second front……


      Change is coming.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:06 PM

      It wouldn’t hurt!! It would be especially helpful if someone filed the same suit here in Philly regarding the misuse of members funds, theft of funds, etc., going back to the dissolution of the MRC.

      I would financially support the filing of such a lawsuit.

      It’s hard enough to win a one front war, it’s almost impossible to win a two front war!!!

      Let’s open up the second front……


      Change is coming.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous5:48 AM

    Could an est having a secreatary having a council car paid for by the members be considered breach of fiduciary duty If you sit on the board and use members money to pay for a secreatary for yourself you fat pos. Just wondering ???? Billy boy

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:28 AM

    file the charge with olms is should be rather easy to prove with a few subponeas

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous9:30 AM

    should be easy file with olms. and lets find out if members should be paying for it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:15 AM

      You are correct that it SHOULD be easy ... But having done so it is way more difficult than you think.
      Especially under a democrat admin.
      The " agents" and personnell at these agencies will do everything in their power to make it difficult.

      Be ready to be relentless.
      It is by design that on your 1st phone call ... They will try to discourage you.
      Get their emails.
      Then formally write your complaint.
      Be sure to CC every agency to include the DOL. DOJ and IRS.

      Soo.

      Olms.

      Cc. Dol, nrlb, lmdra, Doj, irs.
      Regardless if it is their venue ( which it is) each agency should be put on notice with a trackable " papertrail" ...keep every correspondence on a hard copy in a file.

      Prepare to be stonewalled.

      Make sure you do due diligence in exhausting all remedy per the ubc constitution and by laws.
      Keep allll of those letters.
      Forward all of those letters systematically showing your efforts.

      It should be easy. It isnt by design.
      They want you to give up.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous3:59 PM

    cars for everyone the it guy fat napkin scab teddekin. nothing to se here fellows. I'm spending your dues money wisely est sprolles is keeping his people mighty fat of the working members dues money.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous8:12 PM

    Tricia mueller Troy singleton

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous11:50 AM

    From reading the filing... It would seem that if it is legally prosecuted and executed lawfully... It should be the end of McCarron.
    Barring corruption and other influences... And it should be.
    The removal of Douglas J McCarron would be one step in a long process of cleaning out the corruption that has ... In many cases.. Punished its members and has NOT acted on the interest of members for a long time. If you are not sure... Just go back to the point where the rank and file no longer elected or chose their representatives.
    Start their. Circa 1994 convention.

    It was all downhill from there.
    No voice. No vote. No accountability with zero representation... Look where we are.
    Look at their personal wealth.
    There is a direct correlation.

    ReplyDelete

Feel free to speak your mind but we ask you engage in civil discourse and avoid language that is vulgar or defaming.