CROOKED TEETH SHANLEY IS TRYING TO SILENCE EX EST EVELYN SHAPIRO. TWO MORE LAUGHABLE LAWSUITS FILED IN FEDERAL COURT

 I WAS WAITING FOR AN ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINTS BUT LETS PUT IT OUT THERE

 THE CROOKED LAW FIRM OF DAN SHANLEY AT THE REQUEST OF UBC SOCK PUPPET JIM"HEY THAT IS MY WIFE"GLEASON HAVE FILED TWO LAWSUITS AGAINST EVELYN SHAPIRO.WE WILL GO OVER WHY THEY ARE LAUGHABLE AFTER SHAPRIOS LAWYERS FILE A RESPONSE 

 Case 2:22-cv-00245

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

  THE FIRST IS A BLATANT ATTEMPT TO SILENCE SHAPIRO WHO IT APPEARS HAS BEEN TELLING MEMBERS THE REAL REASON FOR THE PACIFIC COUNCIL TRUSTEESHIP.

 THEY SPRINKLED IN THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING  AND WAGE DISBURSEMENT VOTE RIGGING BS TO MAKE IT LOOK GOOD.KEEP IN MIND NO ACCUSATIONS AGAINST THE BINDING TA5 VOTE

 IT APPEARS THEY ARE CRAPPING THEIR DIAPER BECAUSE SHAPRIO IS TALKING.

  “Since resigning her office and membership, Shapiro has been talking with her former appointed staff and attempting to disclose private and privileged communications she had had with Council legal counsel in order to waive the attorney-client privilege held by the Council and in order to benefit herself personally. While some of Shapiro’s disclosures are fabrications, like the reasons the supervision has been imposed, she has made it clear that she will continue to make improper disclosures to try to force a complete waiver of privilege in order to support her false claims.

In making such disclosures and fabricating others, Shapiro seeks to discredit the investigation that uncovered and exposed her repeated instances of vote rigging rather than accepting responsibility” 

And what do the rats at the UBC want?? 

"An order prohibiting Shapiro’s disclosure of all privileged conversations". 

 

NOW I AM NO SHAPIRO FAN BUT THIS CASE IS BS AND IT IS CLEAR THEY DO NOT WANT SHAPIRO TALKING AND EXPOSING THE FACT THAT THEY ARE LYING SACKS

 I WONDER WHO THEY ARE AFRAID OF SHAPRIO TALKING TO?THE MEMBERS OR THE UFCW LAWYERS

 NOW DESPITE THE LIES SHAPRIO DID NOT RESIGN AS EST SHE WAS REMOVED BY A FORCED AND IMPOSED TRUSTEESHIP

 ASK YOURSELF THIS.DID THE UBC ACCEPT SHAPRIOS RESIGNATION AS A MEMBER AND WHY WOULD THEY?? 

 

 

Case 3:22-cv-05082

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

 THE SECOND CASE ATTEMPTS TO BLAME SHAPRIO AND DOUG ORTH FOR  ALLEGED THEFT FROM THE TRAINING FUND BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOB SUSEE

This case is about theft of trust assets and other breaches of fiduciary duties by former Executive Director and fiduciary Bob Susee (“Susee”),

 FUNNY THAT BOB SUSEE IS NOT BEING SUED AND BOTH OF THE PLAINTIFFS  JIM GLEASON AND JESSE KENDOLL ACCORDING TO THE LAW ARE EQUALLY GUILTY FOR FIDUCIARY BREACH IF THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SUSEE ARE TRUE

 AND FOR THOSE OF YOU SUCKING GLEASONS ARSE AND LYING TO MEMBERS AS YOU CONTINUE TO TRY AND PROMOTE YOURSELF THIS LAWSUIT HAS NOTHING TO DO THE PENSION OR ALLIANZ LOSSES

CROOKED TEETH SHANLEY RAN THIS SAME SCAM WHEN THEY RAN THE FALSE PERSECUTION CAMPAIGN AGAINST MIKE MCCARRON.SAME BS TRYING TO BLAME MCCARRON PERSONALLY FOR THE ACTIONS OF FUND DIRECTOR ED RIPLEY AND THE OTHER TRAINING FUND TRUSTEES

IN THE END THE DOL AND THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS SAID BS AND RULED ALL THE TRUSTEES WERE EQUALLY GUILTY. UNDER ERISA ALL TRUSTEES ARE EQUALLY GUILTY

HEY SHANLEY REMEMBER THIS:

"The Board, and the Trustees individually, failed to discharge their duties
with respect to the Training Fund solely in the interests of, and to provide
 benefits to, participants and beneficiaries, failed to defray reasonable expenses
of administering the Training Fund, acted imprudently"

 "The Training Fund's Board of Trustees
(Board), the Trustees individually, and Edward Ripley (Ripley), as
fiduciaries breached their fiduciary obligations to the Training Fund and
violated several provisions of ERISA."

BUT.. BUT... LIKE HERE YOU ALSO LIED AND TOLD THE COURT IT WAS ALL EST MIKE MCCARRON

 IF YOU DO NOT REMEMBER NOT TO WORRY YOU CAN READ IT AGAIN WHEN IT IS SUBMITTED IN THIS CASE

 

AS I SAID WE WILL GET TO THE LAUGHABLE PART LATER BUT I HAVE TO COMMENT

 

WHAT BIZARRO PLANET DO THESE PEOPLE COME FROM 

 

IN AN ATTEMPT TO PREJUDICE THE COURT AND DEFAME SHAPIRO CROOKED TEETH SHANLEY STATED:

 

"Shapiro also fully acknowledged in that same oath that

`violating this pledge “stamp[ed]” her “as a person devoid of principle—and destitute of honor—only worthy of the scorn and contempt of [her] Brothers and Sisters.”

 Shapiro’s conduct not only shows that she is destitute of honor and worthy of the scorn and contempt of her former Brothers and Sisters"

 WHERE DO THEY GET THIS DELUSIONAL HORSESHYTE

 

 "destitute of honor"

"worthy of the scorn and contempt"

 "a person devoid of principle"

(WAIT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT DOUG MCCARRON??)

 

WAS SHE ALSO ACCUSED OF:

 REVEALING THE SECRET HANDSHAKE 

NOT WEARING HER ROYAL ORDER OF THE WATER BUFFALO HAT

 FAILING TO JOIN THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR IN A HOLY CRUSADE TO KILL THE HEATHENS

  

"contempt of her former Brothers and Sisters" 

YOU MEAN LIKE THESE MORONS WHO THINK BLOW UP RUBBER RATS DO NOT MAKE THEM LOOK LIKE ARSEHOLES

    BY THE WAY IF THAT IS A UBC RAT THE ORANGE CONE IS WAY TO BIG

SERIOUSLY YOUR HONOR WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE COURT FOR A DELAY. WE REQUEST THE COURT TO FORCE THESE MORONS AND THEIR ATTORNEY ARSECRACK DAN SHANLEY, WHO ALSO CARRY'S A CARPENTERS BOOK AND WILL COLLECT A UBC INTERNATIONAL PENSION,TO UNDERGO SOME TYPE OF CULT DEPROGRAMMING.

 

WHILE THEY ARE TO STUPID TO BE A DANGER TO THEMSELVES THE COURT SHOULD NOT BE BURDENED WITH THIS DELUSIONAL HORSESHYTE