KRISTINE COLE AND KEN ERVIN DENY MCCARRON'S SOCK PUPPET JIM GLEASONS SPEW AND ALLEGATIONS
"Defendant denies every allegation in paragraph 6 of the Complaint and expressly denies any involvement in a “double-pay scheme.”
LAWSUIT CONFIRMS UBC COUNCILS HAVE FALSELY MISCLASSIFIED UBC REPS AS SALARY EMPLOYEES AND CHEATED THEM OUT OF OVERTIME PAY
Mr. Ervin notified the Regional Council that he and certain other employees had been misclassified as salaried employees exempt from overtime
On November 23, 2020, the
Regional Council concluded that Mr. Ervin had been misclassified.
BOTH ERVIN AND COLE ACCUSE THE COUNCIL,GLEASON AND HIS UBC INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL SYNDICATE HANDLERS OF BEING LYING SACKS OF SHYTE AND HAVE COUNTER SUED FOR DEFAMATION
"The Plaintiffs did not conduct an independent investigation before making any of
the statements."
On or about December 17, 2021, UBC General President Douglas J. McCarron sent
a letter (“the defamatory letter”) to all members of the local unions affiliated with the Regional
Council.
6. The defamatory letter was sent on behalf of the UBC.
7. The defamatory letter was sent on behalf of the Regional Council.
8. The defamatory letter contains the following statement: “During the independent
investigation, it was discovered that Ken Ervin, a Council Representative, and Kristine Cole, his
Lead were engaged in a double-dipping overtime pay scheme and theft of union time.” These
statements accuse Mr. Ervin of a crime and breach of his fiduciary obligations.
9. Upon information and belief, Plaintiffs’ agents and/or representatives continue to
make the same or similar statements.
10. The statements made and referenced above, and such other statements as may be
identified in the discovery phase of this litigation, are false and defamatory.
11. The Plaintiffs did not conduct an independent investigation before making any of
the statements.
NOW DOES THE UBC HAVE A HISTORY OF SENDING DEFAMING LETTERS WITH LIES AND FALSE ACCUSATIONS TO MEMBERS TO WAGE PERSECUTION CAMPAIGNS AGAINST MEMBERS.WHY YES THEY DO.YOUR HONOR TAKE A LOOK AT THIS EXAMPLE
NOW LETS COUNT THE FLAT OUT LIES IN THIS LETTER TO MEMBERS
(1) The Federal Court saw the
overwhelming evidence of his misconduct and refused to stop the Supervision hearing.
LIES. THE COURT NEVER RULED ON ANYTHING AND THERE WAS NEVER A COURT FILING TO STOP THE SUPERVISION HEARING.THERE WAS A CASE FOR A TRO TO STOP AN ILLEGAL TRUSTEESHIP.IT WAS WITHDRAWN AND THE JUDGE RULED ON NOTHING
(2) Like the federal court, the DOL also saw through Mike McCarron's deceptions and upheld the Supervision
LIES. THE DOL REFUSED TO RULE ON WHETHER THE ORIGINAL TRUSTEESHIP WAS LEGITIMATE, WHICH WAS THE BASIS OF THE COMPLAINT
Dear Mr. McCarron:
This is to advise you of the disposition of the complaint filed with the Secretary of Labor alleging a violation of Title ill of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (I,.MRDA) with regard to the imposition of the trusteeship by the
United Brotherhood of Carpenters
DOL Patricia Fox
"Whether or not the original stated reasons for the trusteeship were sufficient to impose the emergency trusteeship, the
evidence presented at the hearing provided a sufficient basis for the continuation of the trusteeship"
(A)THE DOL REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE IF IT WAS A LEGITIMATE TRUSTEESHIP
(B)THE DOL REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE ANY ALLEGATIONS ON THEIR OWN AND FOX BASED HER OPINION BASED ENTIRELY ON THE UBC HEARING. THE HEARING WAS NOT ONLY A JOKE BUT IT HAS SINCE BEEN PROVEN THE STATEMENTS AND EVIDENCE WERE AND ARE COMPLETE LIES
"Some of the DOL's most serious findings against Mike McCarron include that Mike
McCarron:"
(3)spent "over a hundred thousand dollars of undocumented charges on SWRCC credit
cards"
LIES.NEITHER THE DOL OR ANY FEDERAL COURT EVER MADE ANY SUCH FINDINGS
(4)"pledged assets worth three million dollars as collateral for SWRCC's employers' lines of credit without providing legal protection of the assets."
LIES.NEITHER THE DOL OR ANY FEDERAL COURT EVER MADE ANY SUCH FINDINGS
(5)"charged the Southwest Training Fund above-market rents" which constituted a"prohibited transaction" under federal law. The amount over-charged exceeded $5,000,000 (five million dollars).
LIES.NEITHER THE DOL OR ANY FEDERAL COURT EVER MADE ANY SUCH FINDINGS
THE FACT IS THE INVESTIGATION OF THE LEASES WAS NOT COMPLETE UNTIL 2015 AND THE DOL FOUND THE FUND TRUSTEES, AND NOT THE UNION OR MIKE MCCARRON AS EST, WERE LIABLE AND HAD FAILED TO DO THEIR FIDUCIARY DUTY AS FUND TRUSTEES.THE INVESTIGATION ALSO FOUND THAT BECAUSE MIKE MCCARRON THE EST HAD REIMBURSED THE FUND NO CHARGES OR FINES WOULD BE PURSUED BY THE DOL AGAINST THE FUND
NEWKIRK ALSO STATED:
"These were serious financial violations"
WHAT THESE WERE ARE SERIOUS LIES SENT OUT TO THE MEMBERSHIP IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEFAME A UBC MEMBER
WANT MORE PROOF JUDGE.JUST LET US KNOW
DEFAMATION??
THIS IS THE MODUS OPERANDI OF THE UBC SCUM BAGS AND THEIR LEGAL HACKS AT THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE
HEY JUDGE BRYAN.PERHAPS YOU SHOULD INTERVIEW THE UBC SOCK PUPPET JIM GLEASON WHO IS MAKING THESE ACCUSATIONS TO DETERMINE HIS CHARACTER AND CREDIBILITY
MAYBE GLEASON CAN TELL YOU STORIES ABOUT GIVING UNION BOOKS TO ILLEGAL WORKERS. PERHAPS HE CAN SHARE SOME OF THOSE FUNNY STORIES ABOUT HIM FROM BACK IN CONNECTICUT
UNCLEAN HANDS!!
YOU BET YOUR ARSE...
10. Unclean Hands. Some or all of Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the doctrine of
unclean hands.
