SO TELL US YOU HONOR WHAT DID YOU BASE YOUR DECISION ON??
IT APPEARS THE LETTER FROM THE US ATTORNEY OF COURSE
“no reason for a conference at this time”
"on what the Government understands was the basis for the Local 157 letter"
IF THE COURT "ORDERED" THE INDEPENDENT MONITOR TO RESPOND WHY DID MCGORTY FAIL TO DO SO??
IT APPEARS THE COURT
ALSO IGNORED THE LETTER FROM A UBC MEMBER WHO WOULD BE AN INTERESTED PARTY AND
AS A DECLARED MEMBER OF THE NYC COUNCIL SHOULD HAVE STANDING IN THE CASE.THE
COURT HAS ALSO FAILED TO PUT THE LETTER IDENTIFIED BY THE COURT AS THE
"ZEMSKI LETTER" ON THE DOCKET.NO SINCE TAKING THE CHANCE THE WORLD WOULD
SEE THE COURT MIGHT BE FULL OF SHYTE
AND WHAT ABOUT THE US ATTORNEY LETTER
SO IT APPEARS TORRANCE BASED THEIR OPINION ON "BECAUSE GLEN BEAVIS MCGORTY AND SOME COUNCIL LEGAL HACK AND HIRED HAND SAID SO".
LOL. BECAUSE MCGORTY SAID SO IS RIGHT UP THERE WITH "THE CHECKS IN THE MAIL" AND "I WILL RESPECT YOU IN THE MORNING"
"Based on discussions with counsel for the District Council and the Independent Monitor, who contacted the Local 157 president, our understanding is that"
"THIS RESULTED IN A MOTION"
"APPEAR UNFOUNDED"??
SPECIFICALLY??WHAT INVESTIGATION DID THE US ATTORNEY DO BESIDES TAKE THE WORD OF MCGORTY AND THE COUNCIL??
THE "US ATTORNEY" DID NOT DECLARE THEY CONTACTED THE LOCAL 157 PRESIDENT
IT APPEARS THE "US ATTORNEY" NEVER INTERVIEWED THE MEMBER WHO MADE THE MOTION FOR A COURT CONFERENCE SINCE HE OR SHE WOULD BE THE ONLY SOURCE THAT WOULD KNOW WHY THE MOTION WAS MADE. LET'S TAKE THE WORD OF GLEN MCGORTY WHO THE US ATTORNEY CLAIMS IS AT ISSUE HERE.THAT IS A BIG BULLSHIT
"At the Local Union 157 membership meeting in March, a member raised complaints about Union leadership and the Independent Monitor—specifically, a concern about a trip taken by the Independent Monitor and the Union’s counsel with a large group of union members attending meetings at the union’s parent international union’s training facility in Las Vegas, Nevada, approximately eight years ago"
WHILE QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ASKED SINCE MCGORTY AND JUDGE JUDY TOOK THEIR TRIP TO VEGAS TO THE UBC MEGA SHRINE AND SHYTE HOLE THIS IS NOT THE REASON FOR THE CONFERENCE REQUEST AND TO DECLARE SUCH IS BS
JUST CURIOUS. IF THE ISSUE ABOUT MCGORTYS TRIP TO THE HEADQUARTERS OF THE UBC INTERNATIONAL SYNDICATE TRIP IS 8 YEARS OLD AS TORRANCE CLAIMS THEN WHY HAS MCGORTY NOT ENDED THE ISSUE OVER THE LAST 8 YEAR BY SIMPLY ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS ASKED.
NOBODY ACCUSED ANYBODY OF ANYTHING BUT YOU MUST BE A SPECIAL KIND OF STUPID TO THINK MEMBERS WOULD NOT SAY WTF!!SINCE THE US ATTORNEY HAS INSERTED THIS ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT I AM SURE MCGORTY HAS NO PROBLEM ANSWERING THESE QUESTIONS BEFORE THE COURT IF ANY MEMBER REQUIRES IT
RATHER SIMPLE HONEST QUESTIONS:
(1) WHY DID THE BABYSITTER FOR THE CONSENT COURT TRAVEL TO THE UBC INTERNATIONAL HOME OF THOSE WHO FACILITATED THE NYC CORRUPTION AND WORKED TO KEEP MIKE FORDE IN OFFICE.WE UNDERSTAND WHY JUDGE JUDY WENT. BECAUSE LIKE MANY EX FEDERAL EMPLOYEES SHE IS NOW ON THE UBC PAYROLL BUT WHY THE ALLEGED UNBIASED CONSENT COURT BABYSITTER
(2)WHO DID THE MCGORTY MEET WITH WHEN THERE AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE.EXACTLY WHAT DID THE TRIP TO VEGAS HAVE TO DO WITH THE CONSENT DECREE
(3)DID THE MONITOR BILL THE COUNCIL FOR LEGAL FEES FOR HIS VEGAS TRIP TO THE UBC SHYTEHOLE
(4)WHO PAID THE MONITORS EXPENSES FOR HIS VEGAS TRIP TO THE UBC SHYTEHOLE
HONEST QUESTIONS BUT TO TELL THE COURT THIS IS THE REASON FOR CONFERENCE REQUEST IS BS
THE REAL TRUTH IS THAT MEMBERS I HAVE SPOKEN TO ARE CONCERNED THE COURT WILL BE TURNING THE COUNCIL BACK OVER INTO THE HANDS OF THE PROVEN CORRUPT RATS AT THE NYC COUNCIL.GEIGERS CREW OF RATS HAVE PERSECUTED MEMBERS TO SUPPRESS DISSENT,BEEN SUED FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT,THE COUNCIL APPEARS TO BE STILL INFILTRATED WITH MOB FIGURES,THE COUNCIL HAS SOME ISSUES WITH PAC FUNDS AND ARE STILL THE SAME ARROGANT PUNKS AND CORRUPT POS THAT HAS ALWAYS EXISTED IN THE UBC.ALL RIGHT UNDER MCGORTYS NOSE
MEMBERS ARE ALSO CONCERNED WHAT THE FUTURE OF THE NYC COUNCIL AND ITS MEMBERS WILL BE ONCE THE CONSENT DECREE IS LIFTED AND THE SCUM BAG MCCARRON IS FREE TO DO AS HE PLEASES.
AS WE ALL HAVE SEEN MCARRON HAS BEEN SEIZING AND LOOTING LOCALS AND COUNCILS ACROSS THE UBC LAND OF OZ,TAKING OUT ELECTED OFFICERS WHO WOULD NOT OR COULD NOT DO AS THE UBC INTERNATIONAL ORDERED,IMPOSING PHONY AND ILLEGAL TRUSTEESHIPS AND FORCING MERGERS TO CONSOLIDATE THE INTERNATIONALS POWER AND LOOT FUNDS.
SEEMS NYC COUNCIL HACKS LATELY HAVE BEEN DECLARING "THERE IS NO MERGER COMING"WHERE HAVE WE HEARD THAT LIE BEFORE?IF AN EAST COAST MERGER IS COMING AS ANTICIPATED BASED ON MCCARRONS ACTIONS THAT MAKES THOSE PROCLAIMING NO MERGER EITHER CLUELESS OR LYING SACKS .
HERE IS AN IDEA.IF DOUGY WEINSTEIN MCARRON HAS NO MERGER PLANS FOR THE EAST COAST I AM SURE HE WILL NOT MIND SIGNING A DOCUMENT TO SUBMIT TO THE COURT AND TO SEND TO MEMBERS DECLARING SUCH.RIGHT??
AS DETAILED IN THE ZEMSKI LETTER MEMBERS ARE SEEKING TRANSPARENCY AND INCLUSION IN THE PROCESS YET ARE BEING IGNORED AND EXCLUDED
ONCE AGAIN THE UBC RATS ARE DEMANDING THAT UBC MORONS AND CROOKS
IT APPEARS WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS THE CORRUPT NYC COUNCIL AND MCGORTY CONSPIRING TO REMOVE THE COURTS OVERSIGHT OF THE NYC COUNCIL.IT APPEARS WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS MCGORTY AND THE GEIGER RATS NOT WANTING MEMBERS APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT TO DISPUTE THE BS PICTURE THEY HAVE BEEN PAINTING FOR THE COURT OF LITTLE PUPPIES AND BUNNYS AT THE NYC COUNCIL. IN FACT THE RATS ARE STILL IN THE HEN HOUSE.
THIS IS NOT MCGORTY,TORRANCES, MARREROS,MCCARRONS OR GEIGERS UNION. IT IS THE RANK AND FILE MEMBERS UNION. THE SAME RANK AND FILE MEMBERS THE CONSENT DECREE WAS PUT IN PLACE TO PROTECT FROM CORRUPT UBC LEADERSHIP.FOR THE COURT,MCGORTY AND THE US ATTORNEY TO CONSPIRE TO DENY THEM THEIR VOICE AND DEMAND THEY ACT AS LEMMINGS AND SERVANTS TO WHATEVER POS THE UBC INSTALLS AT THE NYC COUNCIL IS ALSO A BIG BULLSHYTE
ON A SIDE NOTE"DID THEY KNOW YOU WERE RECORDING THEM" NONE OF YOUR .....BUSINESS.ISN'T NY A ONE PARTY CONSENT STATE?
