SO LET'S SEE
MEMBERS FUNDS AND BANKS ACCOUNTS WERE SEIZED BY FORCE AND HANDED OVER TO SOUTHWEST COUNCIL ON FREMONT AVE IN LA
MEMBERS COVERAGE IS NOW GARBAGE BECAUSE THE SOUTHWEST COUNCIL SAY THEY CANNOT AFFORD IT!!
RETIREES WERE SCREWED OUT OF THEIR COVERAGE BECAUSE THE SOUTHWEST COUNCIL SAY THEY CANNOT AFFORD IT!!
NO CANT BE...
IF $25,000 WAS PAID I AM SURE FRANK HAWK PAID OUT OF HIS OWN POCKET..CORRECT??
BOY THE UBC INTERNATIONAL GRAND POO BAH SURE CAN PICK THEM SEWER RATS
I AM SURE MEMBERS WERE CONSULTED AND VOTED TO APPROVE THESE EXPENDITURES.CORRECT??
I AM ALSO SURE THE TRUSTEES PRE APPROVED IN ADVANCE ANY PAYMENT BY THE EST TO THE DODGERS OR ANYTHING ELSE. AFTER ALL THE UBC LAWYER DAN SHANLEY TOLD THE FEDERAL COURT THAT WAS MANDATORY
I MUST SAY I AM SURPRISED. I REALLY CANT BELIEVE MEMBERS WOULD RATHER HAVE, AND VOTED FOR, DODGERS NIGHT INSTEAD OF LOWER CO-PAYS, BETTER COVERAGE AND FOR RETIREES TO HAVE COVERAGE.
ONCE AGAIN.IS THIS A LEGITIMATE EXPENSE IN THE OPERATION OF A UNION UNDER THE LMRDA ??
BY THE WAY FRANKY
PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW YOUR MOM CHARLENE WHITLINGER IS ON THE PAYROLL OF THE COUNCIL AND BEING PAID AS A "MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT"
LAST YEAR IT SEEMS MS WHITLINGER GOT $126,000 LISTED AS A "MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT"
YET THE SOUTHWEST COUNCIL LISTS HER AS THE "DIRECTOR" OF THE COUNCIL CAREER CONNECTIONS
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE NOT AWARE THIS BS IS THE UBC PROGRAM TO SCAM SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL KIDS.
IT APPEARS FRANKY MOMS JOB IS TO CON SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL KIDS INTO BECOMING INVOLVED THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE
FRANKY"S MOM IS LISTED AS:
CHARLENE WHITLINGER:OUTREACH PROGRAM DIRECTOR
(909)755-6501 CWHITLINGER@WSCARPENTERS.ORG
ABOVE AND BEYOND "WHY" SHE IS BEING PAID AS A CONSULTANT INSTEAD OF AS AN EMPLOYEE .....
WHAT QUALIFICATIONS DOES SHE HAVE TO HOLD THE POSITION
HOW DOES BEING AN EX DEPUTY SCHOOL SUPER QUALIFY HER AS A "CONSULTANT" TO THE SOUTHWEST COUNCIL??
THIS IS ALMOST AS HILARIOUS AS YOUR BROTHER LUMPY HAWK BEING ON THE UBC PAYROLL AND PUT ON THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
BUT OF COURSE NOT AS HILARIOUS AS A CHICKEN HAWK BEING MADE WESTERN DISTRICT VP
SPEAKING OF LUMPY HAWK. HEY FRANKY CAN YOU EXPLAIN THIS $37,987 FOR LUMPY??
I WOULD LIKE TO SOLICIT SOME OPINIONS....
IF YOU TELL SCHOOL KIDS THAT THE UBC IS THE GREATEST THING SINCE TOILET PAPER AND IF THEY END UP JOINING THE UBC AND BECOME INVOLVED IN THE UBC PRE- APPRENTICE/APPRENTICE BS THEY WILL RECEIVE TOP NOTCH TRAINING,THEY COULD HAVE A GREAT PENSION AND HEALTH COVERAGE WHEN THEY RETIRE,THE UBC IS A DEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATION WHERE MEMBERS GET TO VOTE,THE UBC LEADERSHIP CARES ABOUT MEMBERS,THE UBC LEADERSHIP AND THEIR HAND PICKED STOOGES RESPECT MEMBERS AND THEY ARE ARE HONEST GREAT PEOPLE. DOES THIS MAKE YOU A LIAR??
IF YOU DO NOT INFORM POTENTIAL UBC MEMBERS OR POTENTIAL PRE- APPRENTICES THAT THE UBC LEADERSHIP ARE PUNKS AND CROOKS,THAT THEY ABUSE AND PERSECUTE THEIR OWN MEMBERS,THAT THEY SEIZE COUNCILS AND LOCALS BY FORCE IN PHONY TRUSTEESHIPS AND HOSTILE TAKE OVERS,ROB AND LOOT PENSIONS AND OTHER FUNDS AND ARE STRAIGHT UP ALL AROUND POS DOES THAT NOT MAKE YOU A LIAR AS WELL??
1 comment:
Is any of this surprising??
Is any of this new behavior a new low for UBC employees and executive officers?
How many UBC/Council employees and officers have ever been held accountable for this kind of activity?? Clearly not enough to convince others to not do the same. The few UBC/Council employees and officers that have been held accountable for their misdeeds have only been held accountable because they became a target for Team McCarron, and not for any other reason.
So what’s next?? Obviously there is an extensive and very visible pattern of criminal activity throughout the UBC that everyone knows about because it’s all laid out in the LM2’s and other disclosure reports. So know one can say they didn’t know who was doing what, when, where, for how much, and who was being charged for it.
So what’s next?? I think it’s time we use this platform as a way to review legal strategies designed to hold Team McCarron accountable. I don’t think there is any way a member driven RICO case would lose against Team McCarron. I also don’t think a RTW case would lose either. I’d prefer a RICO case, but that’s just me.
But at this point I think we need to develop a plan to hold these ass holes accountable. The hardest part is getting started, but once the ball is rolling it’s all over!!
Post a Comment