Saturday, January 27, 2018

ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE YOUR ASS


 WHAT DOCUMENTS BELONG TO MEMBERS UNDER THE REAL LAW AND NOT UBC OR HACK LAWYERS DELUSIONS

When a plan participant or beneficiary
asks for information or documents relating
to the plan, ERISA is fairly specific about how the plan NEEDS TO BY FEDERAL LAW TO RESPOND


ERISA Sections 101(k), 104(b)(4)
and 105(a) set forth the principal rules
governing participant requests for in-
formation. If a request falls within the
categories enumerated in these sections, the plan must provide the information. 
Specifically, the PPA added
ERISA Section 101(k), which requires
multiemployer plan administrators
to provide a copy of the following in-
formation when a participant or beneficiary, employee representative or
contributing employer requests it in
writing:
Any periodic actuarial report
(including any sensitivity testing)
received by a plan for any plan
year that has been in the plan’s
possession for at least 30 days
(including actuarial reports pre-
pared in connection with the
plan’s annual valuation or pursu-
ant to the requirements for plans
in endangered or critical status)
Any quarterly, semiannual 
or annual financial 
report prepared for
the plan by any investment manager 
or advisor or other fiduciary
that has been in the plan’s 
possession for at least 30 days
-

Section 3(2) of Title I of ERISA to include: “[A]ny plan, fund, or program . . . established or maintained by an employer or employee organization, or by both, to the extent that by its express terms or as a result of surrounding circumstances such plan, fund or program . . .  (ii) results in a deferral of income by employees for periods extending to the termination of covered employment or beyond . . .”

The term “employee organization,” defined in section 3(4) of ERISA, in pertinent part, includes “any labor union or any organization of any kind . . . in which employees participate and which exists for the purpose, in whole or in part, of dealing with employers concerning an employee benefit plan, or other matters incidental to employment relationships; or any employees’ beneficiary association organized for the purpose in whole or in part, of establishing such a plan.”

Section 3(5) of ERISA provides that the term “employer” means “any person acting directly as an employer, or indirectly in the interest of an employer, in relation to an employee benefit plan; and includes a group or association of employers acting for an employer in such capacity.”
The term “plan sponsor” is defined in section 3(16) of ERISA as (i) the employer in the case of an employee benefit plan established or maintained by a single employer, (ii) the employee organization in the case of a plan established or maintained by an employee organization, or (iii) in the case of a plan established or maintained by two or more employers or jointly by one or more employers and one or more employee organizations, the association, committee, joint board of trustees, or other similar group of representatives of the parties who establish or maintain the plan.

Friday, January 26, 2018

Facebook "like"s are Protected Activity

HEY JOHN BOB DECARLO.CINCH UP YOUR LOINS YOU ARROGANT CHIMP

 2nd Circuit Agrees with NLRB

In 2014 the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its ruling in Triple Play Sports Bar. It decided that "like"ing a Facebook post may IS a protected concerted activity under federal labor law

 The NLRB ruled that posts and the subsequent "like" were protected activity under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA),  Section 7 of the NLRA

 SO LETS SEE.. STALKING A FACEBOOK PAGE AND MAKING COPIES OF SWRCC EMPLOYEES AND UBC MEMBERS LIKES ON MIKE MCCARRONS FACEBOOK PAGE

SUBMITTING COPIES OF THOSE "LIKES"TO A FEDERAL COURT IN AN ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE THOSE EMPLOYEES AND  UBC MEMBERS WHO DID NOT BELIEVE IN THE THE LAW FIRM OF JOHN BOB DECALRO AND CHICKEN SHIT SHANLEY CAMPAIGN TO DISPOSE OF MIKE MCCARRON FOR REFUSING TO PAY LEASE OVERCHARGES AS DECARLO ORDERED

 LEASE OVERCHARGES DECARLO SAID TWEEDLE DEE DRAPER AND THE UBC BS KANGAROO TRIAL SYSTEM,LYING SACK NEWKIRK,SELL OUT WHORES THORNHILL AND HAWK,LITTLE TYKES MCDONALD ALL LIED ABOUT AS JOHN BOB TOLD A FEDERAL COURT "THEIR WERE NO LEASE OVERCHARGES"

 

AND..LETS SEE HOW MANY OF THOSE "LIKES" WERE DISPOSED OF IN THE SWRCC PURGE OF "THREATS" TO DIRTY DOUG WEINSTEIN KINGDOM

GOTTA LOVE THE NLRB WHEN DIRTY DOUGS PROTECTION IS GONE.INQUIRING MINDS SUDDENLY WANT TO KNOW.

ALL THOSE ON JOHN BOB DECARLOS "LIKE" LIST WHO WERE DUMPED BY THE SWRCC LETS TALK

 

HEY JOHN BOB I AM NOT INTIMIDATED BY YOU CLOWNS AND MUCH SMARTER THAN THE GOLD TWINS.YOU AND YOUR HACKS SLEEP TIGHT

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

The Expected One: Kathleen McGowan

THE GREATEST STORY NEVER TOLD!

A POLITICAL RIVALRY TURNED DEADLY



AN INTRICATE LOVE TRIANGLE

OR TWO....

OR THREE......


NIGHTS AT THE SHERATON......


UBC ADMIN JOBS...


AND THE
MESSIAH!!


"I AM THE ICE CREAM CRAPPER HEAR ME ROAR"

opps sorry I mean




ITS A TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE ISN'T IT



Saturday, January 20, 2018

UBC ADMITS GUILT!!

UBC LAWYER HINEYMAN TELLS NLRB THEY ARE GUILTY ON COUNTS 1-9

OF

"IMPLICITLY THREATENING AND COERCING UBC MEMBERS"

 

ONCE AGAIN UBC TELLS MULTIPLE LIES TO NLRB

NEW CHARGES TO BE FILED FOR VIOLATION OF SECTION 8. HINEYMAN ATTEMPTS TO INTIMIDATE MEMBERS FROM FILING UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CHARGES.

UBC HACKS TRYING TO PUNISH MEMBER JOHN NEWEL FOR EXPOSING THESE RATS EXTORTION OF UBC MEMBERS AND THEM

"IMPLICITLY THREATENING AND COERCING UBC MEMBERS"

 

SEE YOU MAY 1ST DOUGY. I HOPE YOU LIKE SURPRISES...

UBC Freedom of Speech Policy

UBC Freedom of Speech Policy
THIS BLOG CONTAINS WHAT THE UBC FEARS MOST.INFORMATION.THIS BLOG IS FOLLOWING THE COURT CASE IN THE PERSECUTION OF MIKE MCCARRON WITH DOCUMENTS FROM THE CASE DOCKET IN REAL TIME AS THEY ARE FILED. IT REVEALS HOW FAR THE UBC, DOUG MCCARRON AND THEIR HIGH PAID LAWYERS WILL GO TO DESTROY ANY MEMBER WHO TELLS HIM NO....COPYRIGHT BROTHERMIKEMCCARRON.COM 2013.