I WONDER IF THEY CAN CLAW BACK ANY OF THE PAYOFFS THEY HAVE MADE WITH MEMBERS DUES MONEY TO FOR SALE TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER POLITICAL HACKS AND ON THE TAKE FEDERAL JUDGES
ONE OF THE TOOLS CASH "ET EYES" MCCARRON
DOUGY.PHONE HOME!!
PLASTIC SURGERY SURE HAS DONE WONDERS FOR CASH MCCARRON??
BAHAHAHA!!!
NO DOUG.PEOPLE ARE NOT LAUGHING AT YOU. THEY ARE LAUGHING WITH YOU
AND HIS CROOKED LAW FIRM OF DECARLO AND SHANLEY(NOW SHANLEY
APC) USED TO PERSECUTE MEMBERS WHO THEY TARGETED WITH CAMPAIGNS OF LIES AND
MISINFORMATION HAS BEEN AN LMRDA SECTION 501 CASE FILED IN
FEDERAL COURT. IT LOOKS LIKE THOSE DAYS ARE NOW OVER FOR GOOD
YOU KNOW DANNY BOY WITH ALL THAT UBC CASH IN LEGAL FEES I THOUGHT YOU WOULD HAVE BETTER TEEF
CROOKED TEEF SHANLEY AND
OTHER UBC LEGAL HACKS HAVE FLAT OUT LIED AND FILED FALSE STATEMENTS IN FEDERAL
COURTS WHEN RUNNING A SECTION 501 SCAM. THE ISSUE HAS BEEN THAT THE UNIONS DO NOT HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO FILE A SECTION 501 IN FEDERAL COURT.THAT RIGHT IS RESERVED FOR THE
MEMBERSHIP IF THE UNION FAILS TO PURSUE A CASE WHEN ASKED. THE COURTS HAVE BEEN SPLIT ON THE UNIONS RIGHT IN FEDERAL COURT NOT
BECAUSE IT REALLY WAS IN QUESTION BUT BECAUSE DEFENDANTS HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED
BY JUDGES WHO ARE ON THE TAKE, AS IT APPEARS WAS THE ISSUE IN MIKE MCCARRONS CASE, OR TO
STUPID TO BE A FEDERAL JUDGE
MIKE MCCARRON WAS
FOUND GUILTY OF A SINGLE SECTION 501 BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY FOR FAILURE TO
GET TRUSTEES PRE APPROVAL BEFORE HE WROTE A CHECK. ANYBODY WHO IS FAMILIAR WITH
THE UBC STRUCTURE KNOWS THE UNION TRUSTEES DO NOT APPROVE SHYTE EITHER BEFORE OR AFTER. THEY
REVIEW AND PRESENT TO THE DELEGATE BODY WHO APPROVE. THE ONLY TIME A PRE
APPROVAL IS REQUIRED IS IF THE PAYMENT IS MADE BY ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER. THE
REASON FOR THE COURTS RULING WAS BECAUSE SHANLEYS CREW OF MISFIT TOYS LIED TO
THE COURT AND CONVINCED THE COURT AND A WILLING JUDGE PRE APPROVAL WAS REQUIRED.
EITHER JUDGE
SELNA WAS ON THE TAKE OR TO STUPID TO BE A JUDGE. SINCE HE WAS PUT ON THE
BENCH BY DIANE FIENSTEIN THE WIFE OF DOUG BUSINESS PARTNER RICHARD BLUM I AM
GUESSING THE LATTER. HE ALSO CAME IN UNINVITED AND SEIZED THE CASE WHICH WAS
NOT THE NORMAL PROCEDURE
ANOTHER UBC MEMBER
WHO IS TO HUMBLE TO TAKE CREDIT HELPED THE SECTION 501 SCAM DEMISE WHEN HE
NETWORKED WITH JUAN SANCHEZ'S LAWYER AND RAISED THE ISSUE. THEY DISMISSED BASED
ON THE UNION NOT HAVING THE RIGHT TO FILE A 501 IN FEDERAL COURT.
” BEING FULLY
ADVISED, THE COURT GRANTS DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSES
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE BECAUSE PLAINTIFFS LACK A VIABLE RIGHT OF
ACTION UNDER SECTION 501 OF THE LMRDA”
FROM THERE WE WENT
TO SHAPIROS LAWYER AND THE FEDERAL COURT ALSO DISMISSED IN BOTH CASES.
“DEFENDANT CONTENDS THAT THE COMPLAINT SHOULD BE DISMISSED BECAUSE PLAINTIFFS
DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER SECTION 501 OF THE LMRDA. DKT. # 10 AT 3–4.
THE COURT AGREES”
SHANLEY GAVE UP
BEFORE THE APPEALS COURT AND MADE A DEAL.
FROM THERE IT WENT TO ALBERT BONDS LAWYER AND THEY
DISMISSED BASED ON THE UNION NOT HAVING THE RIGHT TO FILE A SECTION 501 IN
FEDERAL COURT .
” 29 U.S.C. § 501(B). NOWHERE DOES THE TEXT AUTHORIZE SUITS
BROUGHT BY UNIONS. “INDEED, THE TEXT OF SECTION 501 STRONGLY SUGGESTS THAT
CONGRESS DID NOT WANT UNIONS TO HAVE A FEDERAL CAUSE OF ACTION” STRIKE 3
NOW IT APPEARS TO
HAVE TAKEN ON A LIFE OF ITS OWN. A FEW DAYS AGO IN THE CASE AGAINST THE EX BOILERMAKERS PRESIDENT NEWTON
JONES THE CASE WAS DISMISSED BASED ON GUESS WHAT.
THE UNION NOT HAVING THE RIGHT TO FILE A SECTION 501 IN FEDERAL COURT. STRIKE
4.
AND ONE OF THE CASES CITED WAS..
EG.. MID-AMERICA CARPENTERS REG. COUNCIL
V. BOND, 2023 WL 2734209, AT *3-4 (E.D.
MO. MAR. 31, 2023) MANY COURTS HAVE UTILIZED A SIMILAR ANALYSIS TO HOLD § 501
DOES NOT CREATE A FEDERAL CAUSE OF ACTION FOR UNIONS OR OTHERWISE GRANT FEDERAL
COURTS JURISDICTION OVER ANY SUCH CLAIMS. HOWEVER, § 501(A) DOES NOT CREATE A
CAUSE OF ACTION OR OTHERWISE PERMIT A CLAIM FOR BREACH OF THESE DUTIES TO BE
FILED IN FEDERAL COURT"
THE LITTLE RAT
DANNY BOY CROOKED TEETH SHANLEY AND HIS CREW OF LEGAL HACKS AND MISFIT TOYS HAVE
USED THE LMRDA SECTION 501 CAMPAIGNS OF LIES TO PERSECUTE AND RETALIATE AGAINST
NUMEROUS UBC OFFICERS WHO SAID NO, REFUSED CASH MCCARRONS DEMANDS AND WOULD NOT
OR COULD NOT DO AS THEY WERE TOLD.
MIKE MCCARRON
FOUND GUILTY OF A SINGLE SECTION 501 FIDUCIARY BREACH FOR NOT GETTING A TRUSTEE PRE APPROVAL THAT DID NOT AND DOES NOT EXIST.IT ONLY EXISTS IN THE LIES SHANLEY WAS ALLOWED TO FILE WITH THE COURT
THE SEVERITY OF A FAILED FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM IS REVEALED IN THIS CASE AS MIKE MCCARRON HAD A ROUGHLY $5.4 MILLION DOLLAR JUDGEMENT HANGING OVER HIS HEAD. MIKE MCCARRON WAS FORCED TO APPEAL TO THE 9TH CIRCUIT WHICH REVERSED JUDGE SELNA AND RULED..
"THE DISTRICT COURTS AWARD OF DAMAGES TO THE SWRCC WAS AN INAPPROPRIATE WINDFALL AND A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"
AND
"WAS NOT PROPER"
SHANLEY AND CASH ET EYES MCCARRON WERE SURE MIKE MCCARRON WOULD NOT HAVE THE RESOURCES OR FIGHT LEFT IN HIM TO CONTINUE.THEY WERE WRONG
THE POINT OF THIS IS TO MAKE YOU ASK.HOW MANY OTHERS DID NOT HAVE THE RESOURCES TO CONTINUE AND WERE VICTIMIZED BY THE UBC,CROOKED LAWYERS AND THE FEDERAL COURTS
EVELYN SHAPRIO
SHAPIRO WAS BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURT IN A BLATANT ATTEMPT BY SHANLEY TO PREVENT HER FROM EXPOSING HIS CORRUPTION AND GIVING TESTIMONY BEFORE THE NLRB, EBSA, OLMS OR ANY OTHER AGENCY.SHANLEY WAS CRAPPING IN HIS DIAPER THAT SHAPIRO WAS GOING TO POSSIBLY GIVE THE AGENCIES DOCUMENTED PROOF OF FISH EYES DOUGY AND SHANLEY'S CORRUPT ACTIONS
THE LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST SHAPIRO WERE STEPPED UP AFTER SHE REVEALED THE UBC INTERNATIONALS ORDERS TO CRUSH THE COUNCIL REPS UFCW EFFORTS TO THE NLRB
ALBERT BOND
THE REAL REASONS FOR TARGETING AL BOND IS STILL UP IN THE AIR. ALL THE SIGN ALLEGATIONS, WHICH ALONG WITH THE WELLNESS CENTER ISSUE WAS THE MAIN PREMISE FOR THE CASE, HAS BEEN KICKED TO THE CURB.
MY OPINION IS FISH EYES DOUGY DID NOT CARE ABOUT ANY ALLEGATIONS AGAINST BOND BECAUSE THESE ALLEGATIONS HAD BEEN IN THE WIND LONG BEFORE DOUGY ACTED. ONE THEORY IS BOND REFUSED AN ORDER FOR A PENSION MERGER.IN MY OPINION LOOK WHO IS RUNNING THE WELLNESS CENTER PHARMACY AFTER THEY TOOK OUT BOND..
SURPRISE!!!EXPRESS SCRIPTS
BEFORE THEY TOOK OUT BOND AND SEIZED CONTROL EXPRESS SCRIPTS GOT NO MONEY
AFTER THEY TOOK OUT BOND AND SEIZED CONTROL EXPRESS SCRIPTS GOT $4.5 MILLION
LANCE YOSHIMIRO AND
PHIL LIMON
SHANLEY AND HIS MISFITS TOYS ONCE AGAIN LIED TO THE COURT AND CITED BOTH THESE CASES DECLARING THE COURT IN THESE CASES AFFIRMED THE UNIONS RIGHT TO FILE A SECTION 501.SHANLEY IS A LYING SACK
IN YOSHIMIRO THE COURT CLEARLY DECLARED
The parties have not addressed the issue of whether
the union Plaintiffs can sue under § 501(a) of the LMRDA. Accordingly, the Court does not consider this issue at
this time.....The Court finds only that Yoshimura breached his fiduciary duties
pursuant to § 501
IN LIMON THE COURT DECLARED
“"Because
Limon did not challenge Local 721's right to file an action under § 501(a), we
assume, without deciding, that § 501(a) establishes a private right of action
for unions”.
I HIGHLIGHT THESE TWO CASES AS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OUR FAILED COURT SYSTEM WHERE JUSTICE DOES NOT PREVAIL BUT DEFENDANTS LIKE MIKE MCCARRON,SHAPIRO AND OTHERS ARE VICTIMIZED BY LOW LIFE LEGAL HACKS LIKE SHANLEY WHO ARE ALLOWED BY THE FAILED SYSTEM TO FILE LIES IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS
JUAN SANCHEZ
JEFF HARMS
KRISTEN COLE
AND THE LIST GOT ON AND ON
THESE TWO RATS
HAVE USED SECTION 501 LAWSUITS NOT TO HOLD UBC OFFICERS ACCOUNTABLE BUT AS A MEANS
OF CONTROL AND AS A WARNING TO OTHERS
WHO MIGHT BE THINKING ABOUT REFUSING THEIR DEMANDS.THEY HAVE DESTROYED CAREERS
AND FINANCIALLY RUINED UBC MEMBERS IN RETALIATION CAMPAIGNS FOR EXPOSING THEIR CORRUPTION,CHALLENGING OR BEING A THREAT TO THEIR AUTHORITY OR SIMPLY FOR SAYING NO.
NOT ANYMORE!!
THOSE DAYS ARE OVER.WHAT ELSE YOU GOT DANNY
BOY YOU CROOKED LITTLE SHYTE??
