IS THE SHAPRIO PERSECUTION CAMPAIGN OVER?SHANLEY AND THE UBC TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS IN THE 9TH CIRCUIT

IT APPEARS THE SHAPIRO CAMPAIGN MAY BE OVER

 Filed order MEDIATION (SML): By July 26, 2023, appellants shall file either a motion or a stipulation to dismiss these appeals pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The briefing schedule previously set by the court is vacated. [12734238] [23-35182, 23-35183, 23-35184] (JMR) [Entered: 06/12/2023 04:25 PM]

 FRAP42.VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

(a) Dismissal in the District Court.

 Before an appeal has been docketed by the circuit clerk, the district court may dismiss the appeal on the filing of a stipulation signed by all parties or on the appellant's motion with notice to all parties.

 (b) Dismissal in the Court of Appeals.

 (1) Stipulated Dismissal. The circuit clerk must dismiss a docketed appeal if the parties file a signed dismissal agreement specifying how costs are to be paid and pay any court fees that are due.

(2) Appellant's Motion to Dismiss. An appeal may be dismissed on the appellant’s motion on terms agreed to by the parties or fixed by the court.

 (3) Other Relief. A court order is required for any relief under Rule 42(b)(1) or (2) beyond the dismissal of an appeal—including approving a settlement, vacating an action of the district court or an administrative agency, or remanding the case to either of them.

FOR THOSE NOT AWARE THE FEDERAL COURT DISMISSED THE CASES AGAINST EX EST SHAPIRO AND JUAN SANCHEZ WHICH WERE BS TO START WITH. KEEP IN MIND MEMBERS DUES MONEY HAS BEEN USED TO FINANCE THESE AND OTHER PERSECUTION CAMPAIGNS AGAINST UBC MEMBERS. 

 

THE CASES WERE DISMISSED BECAUSE  DANNY BOY CROOKED TEETH SHANLEY AND UNION CRIMINAL SYNDICATES LIKE THE UBC HAVE NO RIGHT TO FILE AN LMRDA SECTION 501 CASE IN FEDERAL COURT.

    SHANLEY AND MCCARRON USE LMRDA SECTION 501 CASES IN FEDERAL COURT TO PERSECUTE UBC OFFICERS WHO TELL THEM TO EAT S.. AND WILL NOT DO AS THEY ARE TOLD.THE UBC CASE AGAINST EX EST AL BOND IN ST LOUIS WAS DISMISSED IN FEDERAL COURT FOR THE SAME REASON.

 

 WITH A THREAT TO THIS PERSECUTION TOOL SHANLEY FILED AN APPEAL WITH THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT LOOKING FOR A RULING ON WHETHER UNIONS HAVE A RIGHT TO FILE 501 CASES IN FEDERAL COURT OR IF THEY ARE RESTRICTED TO STATE COURT.

 

SOMEHOW IN THE 9TH CIRCUIT THE CASE WAS PUT BEFORE A MEDIATOR.REALLY NOT SURE HOW A MEDIATOR CAN RULE WHETHER A UNION CAN FILE IN FEDERAL COURT OR IS RESTRICTED TO STATE COURT

NOW IT APPEARS A DECISION BY THE 9TH CIRCUIT WILL NOT BE MADE.

INSTEAD AS A SHINING EXAMPLE OF OUR FAILED COURT SYSTEM IT APPEARS THEY PLAYED LETS MAKE A DEAL

 THE QUESTION NOW IS WHETHER SHAPIRO HAS BEEN EFFECTIVELY  SILENCED. WILL MEMBERS EVER GET TO SEE THE EVIDENCE SHE HAS DECLARED SHE HAS SHOWING IT WAS SHANLEY AND THE UBC INTERNATIONAL  CRIMINAL SYNDICATE THAT DEMAND THEY SIGN THE CBA WITHOUT MEMBER VOTE, RIG THE CBA VOTES AND CRUSH THE UFCW EFFORT

 ANOTHER QUESTION IS WHETHER SHANLEY AND THE UBC WILL TRY TO PERSECUTE SHAPIRO IN STATE COURT

ONE HAS TO WONDER.WHAT ARE THE TERMS OF "THE DEAL" IF THERE IS ONE?  HOW WERE THEY ALLOWED TO PLAY "LETS MAKE A DEAL" AT THE 9TH CIRCUIT IF THEY DID?

 

 PERHAPS I HAVE IT ALL WRONG. PERHAPS THE MEDIATOR TOLD SHANLEY HE DID NOT HAVE A SNOWBALLS CHANCE IN HELL SO SHANLEY DECIDED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL.

LETS FIND OUT SHALL WE.

 

THIS RULING WAS IMPORTANT TO  MEMBERS AS IT POTENTIALLY COULD HAVE LIMITED FUTURE PERSECUTION CAMPAIGNS AGAINST UBC MEMBERS USING LMRDA SECTION 501 IN FEDERAL COURTS BY SHANLEY AND THE UBC RATS.

 

A NEGATIVE RULING BY THE 9TH CIRCUIT COMBINED WITH THE 4 RECENT FEDERAL COURT DISMISSALS WOULD HAVE BEEN A WELL DESERVED BITCH SLAP TO SHANLEY