"THE LOCAL UNION IS ORDERED TO REINSTATE YOU"
THE UBC INTERNATIONAL ALSO PROVIDES AN IMPORTANT INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 31A
FILE THIS ONE FOR FUTURE USE KIDDIES
"IS NOT AN ELECTION TO FILL VACANCIES"
HERE IS DOUGY MCCARRONS RESPONSE TO A CHALLENGE TO THE ELECTION WHICH HE ORDERED RERUN DUE TO LMRDA VIOLATIONS.
AND BE CLEAR BOYS AND GIRLS. IF THIS WAS NOT A BLATANT LMRDA VIOLATION THEY WOULD NOT BE RERUNNING THIS ELECTION
LMRDA
Requirements: Instructions on the ballot should clearly state the manner in which members should mark their ballots; for example, “Mark an X or check mark in the box next to the name of the candidates of your choice.”
" SHOULD HAVE INCLUDED INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE MEMBERS SELECT UP TO THREE DELEGATES OR THE SLATE"
BUT WHAT DOES THE LMRDA SAY ABOUT SLATE VOTING
"Candidates may be listed on the ballot according to affiliation with a particular slate; however, a voter must also be able to choose among individual candidates if he or she does not wish to vote for an entire slate"
ISN'T "OR THE SLATE" CAUSING "CONFUSION WITH THE MEMBERS AND GIVING THE ILLEGAL INSTRUCTION YOU MUST VOTE FOR THE ENTIRE SLATE. IT DOES NOT CLARIFY MEMBERS LEGALLY MUST BE ALLOWED TO VOTE FOR INDIVIDUALS REGARDLESS IF THEY ARE LISTED AS A SLATE SO WHY INCLUDE "OR THE SLATE"
ALSO THE BIG BLACK ARROW POINTING TO THEIR SLATE BOX SHOWN ON THIS BALLOT SAMPLE IS NOT TO BIASED IS IT?
NOW LET'S SEE A SHOW OF HANDS ON "MISINTERPRETED"
CHOOSE 1..
(A) WALZ AND LEWIS ARE TO STUPID TO INTERPRET THE UBC CONSTITUTION OR ANYTHING ELSE FOR THAT MATTER
OR
(B) WALZ AND LEWIS KNEW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE
I WAS WONDERING
HAVE THEIR BEEN ANY OTHER COMPLAINTS TO THE UBC INTERNATIONAL ON NYC LOCAL ELECTIONS??
HAVE THE OLMS BEEN CONTACTED OVER NYC ELECTIONS
WHY THE ANSWER IS YES TO BOTH
DOUG MARTIN INVESTIGATES!!
HOW IS DOUG MARTIN QUALIFIED TO INVESTIGATE ..WELL ANYTHING?
HEY DOUG MARTIN. I SEE YOU ARE PULLING FROM THE UBC INTERNATIONAL PLAYBOOK
HAVE YOU REFUSED TO CONTINUE TO INVESTIGATE OTHER COMPLAINTS AND CHALLENGES BECAUSE MEMBERS HAVE INSISTED ALL CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING YOUR ALLEGED INVESTIGATIONS BE IN WRITING. HAVE YOU REFUSED TO DO SO AND DEMANDED A PHONE CALL ONLY AGENDA AND NO PAPER TRAIL ??
"As I explained to you, I am a representative of the UBC General President. You failed and refused to cooperate and stated several times that you will not answer any questions over the phone, and you will only answer questions via email or regular postal service mail"
"If I do not hear from you by that time, I will assume that you continue to refuse to cooperate"
SIGNED DOUG MARTIN
RIGHT FROM THE LITTLE JIMMY GLEASON/UBC PLAYBOOK
"YOU HAVE FAILED TO COOPERATE WITH THE UBC.I SPOKE WITH YOU ON THE PHONE ON MAY 19, 2019 AND YOU WERE ADAMANT THAT YOU DID NOT WISH TO DISCUSS THE MATTER ON THE PHONE AND WERE REFUSING TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.YOU ASKED THAT ANY REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION BE PUT IN WRITING"
SIGNED JIM GLEASON
ONE HAS TO ASK IF THIS "NO PAPER TRAIL"POLICY IS A DIRECTIVE FROM THE UBC INTERNATIONAL?
WE DO REMEMBER THE UBC STOOGE RAY BRUGUERAS SEIZING EVERYBODY'S UBC ISSUED CELL PHONES SO HE COULD LOOK FOR AND WIPE A TEXT MESSAGE.
THE TEXT WAS FROM A COUNCIL STOOGE WHO WAS TRYING TO STRONG ARM AND THREATEN THOSE WHO DID NOT FREELY GIVE $200 DONATIONS FOR DOUGY'S LAST ELECTION CAMPAIGN
HEY DOUG MARTIN
NO OFFENSE DOUG BUT THE RECORD FOR UBC EASTERN INTERNATIONAL REPS/INVESTIGATORS IS A BIT LAUGHABLE
ANTHONY PENA TO DAN CHRISTY AND NOW YOU
MEMBERS DO NOT,AND SHOULD NOT, TRUST UBC INTERNATIONAL HACKS WITH A DOGS SUPPER AND MUST ALWAYS FORCE THEM TO PUT THEIR LIES IN WRITING
OH YES DOUG MARTIN
ONE MORE THING....
NEW YORK IS A ONE PARTY CONSENT STATE
The protest and response letters were originally posted here
