THE
PURPOSE OF THIS EXERCISE IS NOT TO DEFEND SHAPIRO. IT IS TO PROVE TO ANY FEDERAL AGENCY OR US ATTORNEY WHO MIGHT BE READING THAT LEGAL HACKS
ON THE PAYROLL OF THE UBC INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL SYNDICATE WILL FILE
AND HAVE FILED LIES AND FALSE STATEMENTS IN FEDERAL COURT IN A BLATANT ATTEMPT TO MISLEAD A FEDERAL JUDGE
NOW I THOUGHT DAN CROOKED TEETH SHANLEY
AND HIS BAND OF MISFIT TOYS AT SHANLEY APC
AKA DECARLO AND SHANLEY.
AKA MUFFYS MARAUDERS.
AKA PECKERWOOD APC
WERE ARROGANT ENOUGH TO LIE TO AND MISLEAD A FEDERAL COURT
NOW IT APPEARS WE HAVE TWO MORE CLOWNS DOING THE SAME
MEET THE DYNAMIC DUO FROM WILLIAMS AND CONNOLLY
NEW ARSE HOLES SAME AS THE OLD ARSE HOLES
HEY GUYS I KNOW YOU THINK YOU ARE THE BIG GUNS BUT REMEMBER WHEN THE JUDGES LAUGHED YOUR BOY CRAIG SINGER OUT OF COURT AND TOLD HIM TO POUND SALT??
CRAIG SINGER WAS ANOTHER WILLIAMS AND CONNOLLY HIRED POS WHO TRIED TO TELL A COURT THE UBC OWNED ITS MEMBERS AND WAS ENTITLED TO THEIR MONEY
THE COURT TOLD SINGER HE WAS AN IDIOT, THE UBC DID NOT OWN SHYTE "NOT SINCE THE 13TH AMENDMENT"AND THE UBC WAS NOT ENTITLED TO ANYTHING "UNLESS IT WAS FREELY GIVEN"
THE COURT ALSO TOLD SINGER HE SUBMITTED 246 PAGES OF BULLSHYTE "STUMP RHETORIC"AND FORCED THEM TO REVIEW IT
"MOST OF YOUR COMPLAINT ARE NOT FACTS AT ALL"
SOUND FAMILIAR
LISTEN TO THE JUDGES TELL SINGER TO PISS OF HERE
Listen to recording for case: UBC, et al v. BCTD, AFL-CIO, et al12-36049Listen:
* WMA files require
Windows Media Player |
|
| Download: | 12-36049 |
| Case Name: | UBC, et al v. BCTD, AFL-CIO, et al |
| Case Number: | 12-36049 |
| Case Panel: | O'SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, BERZON |
| Hearing Location: | Seattle, WA |
| Hearing Date: | 2014-05-12 |
IS IT SOMETHING IN THE WATER AT LAW SCHOOL?? A MAGIC POWDER WHERE YOU JUST ADD WATER, MIX AND POOF INSTANT ARROGANT ASSHOLE
FOR THE RECORD THIS IS NOT A REFLECTION ON ALL ATTORNEYS.JUST THE ONES THAT ARE ARROGANT LYING SACKS OF SHYTE LIKE THE ONES LISTED HERE
SO THE OTHER DAY THESE CLOWNS FILED A 27 PAGE FULL COURT PRESS TO SILENCE SHAPIRO
BEFORE WE START LET ME ASK YOU.
IF THE UBC INTERNATIONAL SYNDICATE AND THE LITTLE WEASEL SHANLEY DID NOT DO AS SHAPIRO HAS ALLEGED WHY ARE THEY WORKING SO HARD TO STOP HER FROM TALKING
SHAPIRO ORDERED VOTE RIGGING!!!!!!
As the minutes of the Council’s
Executive Board meeting from October 25, 2021, moreover, establish:
EST Shapiro addressed the Executive Committee to
explain that during the Western Washington contract negotiations it was
determined that election vote rigging was occurring.EST Shapiro took this to the International immediately
when this was discovered in 2021
AND THEN THIS EVIL MASTERMIND TURNED HERSELF IN!!!
I DON NOT KNOW WHICH IS MORE CONCERNING.IS IT THAT YOU LEGAL HACKS ARE THIS STUPID OR THAT YOU ARE SO ARROGANT THAT YOU THINK WE ARE
NOT ONLY IS MEMBERS DUES MONEY BEING PAID TO THE SHANLEY APC LEGAL HACKS BUT NOW TWO MORE FROM WILLIAMS AND CONNOLLY ARE SUCKING OFF THE UBC TIT
WHY??HOW IS DIRTY DOUG ALLOWED TO USE MEMBERS DUES AS A PIGGY BANK TO WAGE PERSECUTION CAMPAIGNS
SO LETS GET TO JUST SOME OF THE LIES
(1)"Shanley
represented the UBC and the Council in the second half of 2021 with respect to
matters that are relevant to this action"
SHANLEY HAS NEVER REPRESENTED THE PACIFIC COUNCIL. HE HAS ALWAYS REPRESENTED THE UBC INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL SYNDICATE AND DID NOT ACT AS LEGAL BEAGLE FOR THE UBC IN REGARDS TO THE PHONY AND ILLEGAL PACIFIC COUNCIL TRUSTEESHIP UNTIL AFTER IT WAS IMPOSED ON OCTOBER 25,2022.ON THAT DATE EX EST SHAPIRO WAS TAKEN OUT AND THE EBOARD DISSOLVED.
NOBODY GIVES A RATS ASS WHO DIRTY DOUG OR SHANLEY "DECLARES"
SHANLEYS MISFIT TOYS REPRESENT.TO ESCAPE LIABILITY THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE HAS DECLARED IN MULTIPLE FEDERAL COURTS THAT THE UBC INTERNATIONAL IS COMPLETELY SEPARATE AND HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE INDIVIDUAL COUNCILS OR LOCALS.UNTIL OF COURSE AFTER THEY FORCE A PHONY ILLEGAL TRUSTEESHIP TO TAKE OUT AN EST THAT DOUGY PUT IN PLACE WHO WENT OFF THE RESERVATION
(2)"The
fact is, the Council’s Executive Board invited the UBC to impose a trusteeship
over the Council to investigate corruption and mismanagement"
(A)TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF UNION MEMBERS NEITHER THE LMRDA OR THE UBC CONSTITUTION ALLOWS FOR A COUNCIL OR A LOCAL TO ASK TO BE PUT IN TRUSTEESHIP.
(B)THE DOCUMENT PRESENTED TO THE COURT ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS AS PROOF OF THIS LIE IS WORTHLESS AND THE UBC CAN WIPE THEIR ASS WITH IT
FURTHER THIS BS "PROOF" IN NO WAY DECLARES THE COUNCIL "ASKED TO BE PUT IN TRUSTEESHIP"THE LANGUAGE DECLARES "WE WELCOME AND CONSENT TO THE UBC TRUSTEESHIP. AS IN WE CONSENT TO THE TRUSTEESHIP YOU ARE GOING TO IMPOSE ON THE COUNCIL.BEYOND THE "ASKED"LIE BEING TOLD TO THE COURT THE ONLY WAY THIS BS WOULD EVEN BE GIVEN CONSIDERATION IS IF THE PROPER HEARING WAS HELD BEFORE THE TRUSTEESHIP WAS IMPOSED AND THE HEARING COMMITTEE RULED A TRUSTEESHIP WAS WARRANTED
WE HAVE ALWAYS ASKED WHO CREATED THIS BS DOCUMENT.THE LEGAL HACKS AND LYING POS ARE ATTEMPTING TO HAVE THE COURT BELIEVE THAT THE UBC INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL SYNDICATE WALKED INTO THE OCTOBER 25,2022 MEETING AT WHICH TIME THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE BOARD "ASKED TO BE PUT IN TRUSTEESHIP
THAT IS A BIG PILE OF BSWE NOW LEARN THAT IT WAS DAN SHANLEY AND THE UBC INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL SYNDICATE WHO CREATED THIS DOCUMENT IN ADVANCE OF THE OCT 25,2022 SEIZURE
"Dan Shanley, UBC Legal Counsel, introduced the
resolution which welcomes and endorses
the UBC independent investigation""The resolution was passed around the table and signed by the
Executive Committee"
(A)
THIS PROVES THE UBC INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL SYNDICATE HAD DECIDED TO IMPOSE A TRUSTEESHIP ON THE COUNCIL IN ADVANCE OF THE OCTOBER 25,2022 DATE WHEN THEY HAVE FALSELY TOLD THE COURT THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE "ASKED" TO BE PUT IN TRUSTEESHIP
(B)
THIS PROVES THAT THESE ARE NOT THE WORDS OR DESIRES OF THE COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.THESE ARE THE WORDS OF THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE CREATED BY THE MISFIT TOYS AT SHANLEY APC
(C)
THIS PROVES THE DOCUMENT CREATED BY THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE WAS PLACED ON THE TABLE AND THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WERE INSTRUCTED TO SIGN IT
(D)
THEN WE HAVE:
"Dan Shanley asked for council staff to hand over
all electronics – all phones and laptops
and instructed all staff present to head back to the Kent headquarters
office"
WHICH RAISES THE QUESTION AS TO WHO THE HELL IS DAN SHANLEY TO MAKE ANY SUCH DEMANDS ON UBC MEMBERS?
SHANLEY IS A HIRED BITCH.HE IS NOT A UBC ELECTED OFFICIAL.WHY WERE THESE DEMANDS NOT MADE BY DOUGY THE ICE CREAM SHITTER OR ONE OF THE UBC SUCK ASS PRESENT?WERE THESE MEMBERS NOT WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS TO TELL SHANLEY TO KISS THEIR ASS
WE SAW THE SAME BS IN THE SANDRA MALONEY CASE WHERE DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON WAS ACCUSED OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT.
"On or about March 20, 2020, Daniel Shanley and his partner John DeCarlo met with SANDRA
to place SANDRA on administrative leave. They told SANDRA that they wanted to talk about an exit strategy"
" Messrs. Shanley and DeCarlo proceeded to threaten SANDRA"
" Approximately three hours later, Messrs. Shanley and DeCarlo put SANDRA on administrative leave escorted SANDRA to her car and took her parking pass and the key to the building"
WHO THE HELL ARE THESE HIRED HAND BITCHES TO TAKE ANY OF THESE ACTIONS?UNDER WHAT AUTHORITY?
SURE GIVES CREDIBILITY TO SHAPIROS DECLARATION
"For the most part, Dan Shanley acted as if
he was the alter ego of the UBC dictating its position on matters"
IT IS TIME FOR UBC MEMBERS TO PUT THE RAT BOY
AND THE SHANLEY APC TRASH TO THE CURB
"In the aftermath of Plaintiffs’ investigation, and confronted with damning evidence against her, Shapiro resigned her Council position and UBC membership"see Declaration of Mike Kwiatkowski"
(A)
THE UBC SEIZED THE COUNCIL IN TRUSTEESHIP ON OCTOBER 25,2022.THEY HAVE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT A BS DOCUMENT WRITTEN IN CRAYON ALLEGEDLY SIGNED BY SHAPIRO AS PROOF OF SHAPIROS RESIGNATION.IT IS DATED OCTOBER 27,2022.
WHAT INVESTIGATION TOOK PLACE IN TWO DAYS??
THIS WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT BY UBC SUCK ASS AND BACK STABBING BITCH MIKE KWIATKOWSKI.THIS MCCARRON STOOGE WAS RECENTLY APPOINTED BY MCCARRON AS EST OF THE ICROCK COUNCIL.BUT WE WILL GET THIS THIS RAT IN A LATER POST
(B) "and confronted with damning evidence against her"
THEY HAVE NOT PRESENTED ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE AGAINST SHAPIRO EXCEPT "BECAUSE THEY SAY SO"
ONE HAS TO WONDER HOW THEY EVER CAN SINCE THE UBC INVESTIGATIVE TEAM CONSISTS OF NAMES LIKE ANTHONY PENA,MIKE KWIATKOWSKI AND DOUGY THE ICE CREAM CRAPPERS SON MIKE MCCARRON. THESE RATS ARE LYING SACKS WHO WILL TELL ANY LIE DOUG ASKS THEM TO. I AM SURE UNDER FURTHER REVIEW WE WILL FIND THEY ARE ALL BORDER LINE SPECIAL NEEDS WITH IQ'S JUST ABOVE A ROCK. BY THE WAY DOUG WHEN YOU ARE ASKED TO PROVIDE PROOF OF THESE DOUCHE BAGS QUALIFICATIONS YOU WILL HAVE TO TELL THEM ABOUT DAN CHRISTY.
NOW WE COULD GO ON ABOUT THE LIES FOREVER BUT YOU GET THE POINT
LETS LOOK AT DELUSIONAL
ARSE HOLES AND LEGAL HACKS WHO ARE CLAIMING THE UBC LAND OF OZ RULES TRUMP REAL LAW
Shapiro’s Motion Fails Too Because the Council’s Privileged Information Is Not “Reasonably of Concern” to Any Governmental Entity.
(A)
FIRST TO BE CLEAR YOU CAN STICK YOUR PRIVILEGED INFORMATION CLAIMS IN YOUR ASS
(B)
WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO DECIDE WHAT IS OF CONCERN TO ANY FEDERAL AGENCY
"Government actors cannot make improper use of another’s privileged information".
"The NLRB likewise cannot use a party’s privileged communications or materials
so any such communication is not “reasonably of concern” to it"
"Or any other government entity for that matter."
I WONDER IF WE CAN GET THE NLRB OR OTHER GOVERNMENT ENTITY'S TO SUBMIT AN ANSWER TO THESE CLAIMS
I AM SURE IF THESE UBC LEGAL HACKS ARE CORRECT THEN THERE REALLY IS NO NEED FOR ALL THIS BECAUSE THE NLRB OR OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY'S WILL NOT BE USING ANYTHING SHAPIRO TELLS THEM. CORRECT??
FUNNY YOU ARE NOT SUING THE NLRB AND OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
TO TELL THEM WHAT THEY CAN OR CANNOT USE OR TO SILENCE THEM.WHY NOT??
YOU ARE ONLY TRYING TO GET THE COURT TO PREVENT SHAPIRO FROM TALKING TO THEM AND EXPOSING WHAT POS YOU REALLY ARE
OH YES.DEAR WILLIAMS AND CONNOLLY ARSEHOLES
" the Complaint reveals that the LMRDA claim is primarily focused on Shapiro’s vote rigging"
AND SHAPIROS TESTIMONY TO THE NLRB
THAT YOU ARE SO AFRAID OF IS
FOCUSED ON THE UFCW EFFORTS THE
UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATES DEMANDED SHE BUST
FURTHER AS DECLARED BY SHAPRIO SHE GAVE TESTIMONY IN A CASE AGAINST YOUR ATTEMPTS TO BUST THE UFCW EFFORTS LONG BEFORE AND IN ADDITION TO HER CASE WITH THE NLRB.THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE AFRAID OF!!
"The NLRB got involved early on from complaints initiated by others, not just Shapiro, where Shapiro was identified as a key witness to the events under investigation. Her
protected activities predate plaintiffs’ Complaint"
DO US ALL A FAVOR
GO
