FLUFF CASE FILED IN FEDERAL COURT BY "OTHER" UBC CROOKS AGAINST FORMER MCCARRON CRONIE ALBERT BOND

 INSTEAD OF PURSUING ACCOUNTABILITY AND JUSTICE FROM EX ST.LOUIS EST AND MCCARRON CRONIE ALBERT BOND FOR HIS ALLEGED CORRUPT ACTIONS THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE IS ONCE AGAIN BLOWING SMOKE UP MEMBERS ARSE

CROOKS AT THE  NEW MID AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL LED BY ANOTHER UBC SUCK PUMP GARY "THE YACHT" PERINAR HAVE FILED A WORTHLESS  CASE AGAINST BOND IN FEDERAL COURT TO PRETEND THEY ARE HOLDING BOND ACCOUNTABLE

A SIMPLE REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINT REVEALS IT IS BS,DOESN'T STAND A SNOWBALLS CHANCE IN HELL(UNLESS OF COURSE THIS JUDGE IS ALSO A UBC SHIL LIKE SELNA WAS ) AND ONCE AGAIN FILLED WITH MISINFORMATION IN YET ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO MISLEAD A FEDERAL COURT

 IF BOND IS GUILTY OF ALL THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST HIM, THE MAJORITY OF WHICH ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS FLUFF PIECE OF CRAP LAWSUIT, HE MUST BE PROSECUTED. NOT BY THE CRIMINALS AT THE UBC BUT BY FEDERAL AGENCIES WHO STILL REFUSE TO DO THEIR JOB.IT IS CLEAR THAT BOAT LOADS OF UNION MONEY HAVE PERSUADED FEDERAL AGENCIES  TO NOT ONLY IGNORE UNION CORRUPTION BUT TO ALLOW UNION CORRUPTION

 NOW WE ALSO HAVE SECRETARY  OF LABOR MARTY WALSH WEARING HIS SECRETARY OF LABOR KNEE PADS AS HE SUCKS UNION ARSE AND SELLS OUT THE TAXPAYERS TO UNION CRIMINAL SYNDICATES

As of April 1st The TEAMSTERS Central States Pension Plan’s will be able to apply to receive billions of dollars of free no payback taxpayers money from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).

  

 

BOND IS BING SUED ALONG WITH TWO COMPANIES INTERRAIL AND FOXPOINTE

 

Lawsuit alleges $4M in unauthorized payments by St. Louis carpenters union

 

By Jacob Kirn  –  Managing Editor, St. Louis Business Journal

an hour ago

The former leader of St. Louis' carpenters union directed $4 million in unauthorized payments for the purchase and construction of billboards, and entered agreements creating an undesirable tax burden, a new lawsuit alleges. And it claims the ex-leader, Al Bond, used union funds for personal expenses and got an unauthorized payroll check.

The litigation, filed last week in federal court in St. Louis against Bond and two companies, gives more detail about the Chicago chapter of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America's assertion that Bond, former St. Louis executive secretary-treasurer, misappropriated union funds and defrauded the brotherhood. Earlier this month, it filed internal charges against Bond, a proceeding that could threaten his pension.

The national union, based in Washington, D.C., has said that it dissolved the St. Louis-Kansas City Carpenters Regional Council in September "to increase oversight of operations, reduce costs, maximize available resources and increase market competitiveness." The then-local leader, Bond, was ousted, and the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters took over locally, boosting its membership by 20,000.

The new lawsuit, from the Chicago chapter, now called the Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council, alleges that Bond, on behalf of the St. Louis council, in January 2020 entered an agreement with Interrail Outdoor LLC for the purchase and construction of three digital billboards to be constructed in St. Louis, Kansas City and Wichita, Kansas. Only the Wichita billboard was constructed, the suit claims.

The council's executive committee that month approved the purchase, "however, Bond had already caused transfers totaling approximately $2,999,678 in St. Louis Council assets to Interrail," the suit says. After the approval, Bond paid Interrail another nearly $1.06 million of St. Louis council assets, it alleges.

But the more than $4 million in payments to Interrail weren't reviewed or authorized by the St. Louis council's trustees or delegate body, as required by the United Brotherhood of Carpenters' constitution and the St. Louis council's bylaws, the suit says.

"The amounts paid to Interrail were well beyond the standard costs to purchase and construct digital billboards in St. Louis, Kansas City, and Wichita," the suit claims.

The suit also details agreements the St. Louis council allegedly made with another company, Foxpoint Interactive LLC.

It says Mark Bohems, chairman of the Carpenters Joint Training Fund, in February 2021 granted to Foxpoint the exclusive right to sell to third parties advertising space owned by fund property at 8955 E. 38th Terrace, the council's old Kansas City office that now belongs to the Chicago chapter. As part of that deal, the fund was to get 70% of net revenue from the sale of advertising space from years one to seven, dropping to 60% from years eight through 32. Boehms, who's not a defendant in the suit, and Bond then assigned the fund's rights under the Foxpoint agreement to the St. Louis council, the suit says.

And Bond, on behalf of the St. Louis council, in June 2021 entered another agreement with Foxpoint, the suit claims, granting it the right to advertise on signage at its property at 8405 E. Kellogg Ave. in Wichita, with a similar revenue split.

A final ad agreement with Foxpoint came in July 2021, the lawsuit alleges, for the St. Louis council's headquarters at 1419 Hampton Ave.

But any revenue generated by the council under those agreements "would constitute Unrelated Business Income under the Internal Revenue Service Guidelines, which is inconsistent with the St. Louis Council's, and Union's, non-profit status and would therefore create an undesirable tax burden on the St. Louis Council and Union," the suit claims.

Bond, it continued, "violated his fiduciary duty" and didn't get approval from the St. Louis council's executive committee, trustees or delegate body "for the tax implications and expenses" associated with the 32-year Foxpoint agreements.

The suit also alleges Bond caused council assets to be spent on a personal "CPAP machine" ($1,333 in December 2020), medical expenses incurred by his daughter ($927 from November through December 2019) and Fox Theatre season tickets used by Bond and his wife ($4,514 from 2018 through 2020).

And Bond in January 2021 directed his staff to issue a payroll check to him totaling $17,899, though the retroactive salary payment wasn't properly authorized by the council's executive committee, the suit claims.

It seeks an order requiring Bond to return to the union that amount, the personal expenses totaling $6,774 and the $4 million paid to Interrail. It also wants a judge to enter a judgment against Interrail, another defendant, not to exceed the $4 million. And it wants an order declaring the agreements with Foxpoint, the final defendant, unenforceable. The Chicago chapter is represented locally by Jim Martin of Dowd Bennett LLP of Clayton.

Bond couldn't be reached for comment. Interrail, Foxpoint and the Chicago chapter didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.

In a November declaration, Douglas McCarron, general president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said that the UBC had received an anonymous complaint about the St. Louis council from a "purported former employee." 

UBC representatives "were assigned to look into the allegations concerning the St. Louis Council's operations, including allegations of financial malfeasance," McCarron said then.

The local council gave heavily to political candidates and causes, including a push, ultimately unsuccessful, to privatize St. Louis Lambert International Airport's operations.

It also was involved in the redevelopment of the Jefferson Arms building in downtown St. Louis, NorthSide Regeneration's hospital project and homes near the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency's under-construction new western headquarters.

 READ IT HERE

 

 

Carpenters union accuses former chief Al Bond of paying millions to advertising firm without authorization

ST. LOUIS — The Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council is suing Al Bond, the former chief of the St. Louis chapter of the union, accusing him of entering into questionable advertising contracts and directing staff to give him a larger paycheck than the union’s board had authorized. 

In a federal lawsuit filed in St. Louis last week, the union says Bond improperly entered into advertising contracts with two firms, Interrail Outdoors LLC and Foxpoint Interactive. It also accuses Bond of retroactively raising his salary without the board of trustee’s authorization and using union funds for personal expenses, including a CPAP machine (used to treat sleep apnea) and season tickets to the Fox Theatre.

The lawsuit is the latest indication of financial mismanagement at the once-powerful St. Louis-Kansas City Carpenters District Council, which the United Brotherhood of Carpenters dissolved without explanation in September. Bond was fired and management of the local union, for years a political force locally, was moved under the Chicago office, which was renamed the Mid-America Carpenters Regional council.

READ IT HERE AT STLTODAY 

 

 

A FEW OPINIONS ON WHY THE LAWSUIT IS COMPLETE BS

(1)

"Before the UBC dissolved the St. Louis Council it engaged the services of the accounting firm of Terrence R. Mooney, CPA, to perform a best practices review that included a review of the business records and accounts held by the former St. Louis Council. The Mooney firm reported its findings on or about October 27, 2021"

 

ONCE AGAIN LETS FIRST ASK WHY SOME HACK ACCOUNTANT WITH QUESTIONABLE TIES TO THE UBC AND FRANKY THE CHIMP SPENCER WAS BROUGHT TO ST LOUIS TO REVIEW ANYTHING

 HEY MOONEY YOU STILL HAVEN'T EXPLAINED WHY THE LISTED JOB SITE STEEL NJ PLANT ADDRESS WAS ACTUALLY YOUR ACCOUNTING OFFICE.WE CAN TALK  MORE ABOUT THE QUESTIONABLE BS YOU HAVE PULLED FOR FRANKY THE CHIMP BUT WE WILL SAVE THAT FOR ANOTHER TIME

 

THIS CASE STATES "BEFORE THE UBC DISSOLVED THE COUNCIL"  

AND 

"THE MOONEY FIRM REPORTED ITS FINDINGS OCTOBER 27,2021" 

 "BEFORE" YOUR ARSE. THE COUNCIL WAS DISSOLVED ON SEPT 24,2021 A FULL MONTH BEFORE MOONEY TOLD THEM SHYTE.THESE LEGAL HACKS CLEARLY ARE LYING TO THE COURT AND INSINUATING THE COUNCIL WAS DISSOLVED BASED ON MOONEYS FINDINGS.THE COURT SHOULD BE ALSO ASKING WHO THE F.... IS TERRANCE MOONEY

 NOTE: CLICK ON READ MORE IN THE BOTTOM LEFT CORNER OF THIS POST. I HAD TO PUT IN A PAGE BREAK BECAUSE IT IS A BIT LONG WINDED

 

(2)

THIS CASE DECLARES:

” The St. Louis Council maintained bylaws which addressed, among other things procedures for authorizing St. Louis Council expenses.”

YES THE BYLAWS DO AND THEY ALSO ADDRESS THE POWERS OF THE EST TO PAY THOSE EXPENSES AND ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE COUNCIL

 “The Executive Secretary-Treasurer is specifically authorized to expend, in accordance with the procedures of these Bylaws, funds for any or all of the purposes and objects of the Council”

 

BEFORE GOING FORWARD UNDERSTAND THAT ALL COUNCIL BYLAWS ARE BOILER PLATE BYLAWS WRITTEN BY THE UBC INTERNATIONAL. WHILE COUNCILS MAY MAKE CHANGES THOSE CHANGES MUST BE APPROVED B Y THE UBC INTERNATIONAL

 

TO BE CLEAR NEITHER THE UBC CONSTITUTION OR THE COUNCIL BYLAWS GIVE THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THE POWER OR OBLIGATION TO APPROVE SHYTE

 

TO BE CLEAR NEITHER THE UBC CONSTITUTION OR COUNCIL BYLAWS EVER GIVE THE UNION TRUSTEES THE POWER OF OBLIGATION TO APPROVE SHYTE.NOT NOW,NOT THEN AND NOT EVER.

THE RIGHT TO APPROVE IS RESTRICTED TO THE DELEGATES.THE ROLE OF THE TRUSTEES IS TO REVIEW AND PRESENT FOR APPROVAL

 “The Trustees shall audit all books and accounts of the Executive Secretary-Treasurer at least monthly and report their findings to the Council”

 

IN THE PERSECUTION CAMPAIGN OF MIKE MCCARRON THE UBC LEGAL HACKS AT CHICKEN DICK DECALRO AND CROOKED TEETH SHANLEY BLATANTLY LIED TO THE FEDERAL COURT AND TOLD THE COURT NOT ONLY DO THE TRUSTEES APPROVE EXPENDITURES AND PAYMENTS BUT THEY MUST PRE APPROVE ANY EXPENDITURES AND PAYMENTS.THEY TOOK ADVANTAGE OF A FEDERAL JUDGE TO STUPID TO KNOW ANY BETTER

 Document 149-1

12. On May 31, 2013, Mike McCarron paid a bill for $4,736,970.52 without referring this bill to the SWRCC Trustees

 15. Mike McCarron paid this bill without having presented it to the SWRCC’s Trustees for investigation before payment was made.

 19. Mike McCarron “did not present the bill for the garage to the Trustees before payment.”

 

IN THE END MIKE MCCARRON WAS UNJUSTLY FOUND GUILTY OF ONE SINGLE THING.A SECTION 501 BREACH BASED ON LIES TOLD TO THE FEDERAL COURT BY UBC LEGAL HACKS

DOCKET 191

“McCarron did not refer either of these bills to the SWRCC Trustees for investigation as required under the SWRCC’s Bylaws before he made payment”

” IN JUDGE SELNAS ORDER  191  He wrote he did not rule on whether the rents were above or below market but ruled on “without presenting them to the Trustees” before payment”

 

NOW IN THIS CASE THE LEGAL HACKS HAVE NOT USED THE WORDS BEFORE BUT ARE TRYING TO INSINUATE TO THE COURT THAT BOND NEEDED THE TRUSTEES OR DELEGATES APPROVAL BEFORE HE ENTERED INTO AGREEMENTS OR EXPENDED FUNDS. THAT IS COMPLETE BS

“27. Bond knew or should have known that these expenditures were not properly authorized by the St. Louis Council”.

BLATANT LIE AND ATTEMPT TO MISLEAD THE COURT

 

HOWEVER THESE LEGAL HACKS ONCE AGAIN DO LIE TO THE COURT WHEN THEY DECLARE

“47. Bond failed to secure approval from the St. Louis Council’s Executive Committee, its Trustees or its Delegate Body for the tax implications and expenses”

 

ONCE AGAIN NEITHER THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OR THE COUNCIL TRUSTEES HAVE THE POWER OR OBLIGATION TO APPROVE SHYTE

HERE ONCE AGAIN WE HAVE AN ATTEMPT TO MISLEAD A FEDERAL COURT OR A JUDGE TO STUPID TO KNOW ANY BETTER

 

(3)

“34. The Consulting Agreement is unenforceable as a matter of public policy as it was predicated upon Bond’s violation of Section 501(a) of the LMRDA.

 BLATANT LIE SINCE THERE IS NO PROOF BOND IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 501 AND NO COURT HAS CONVICTED HIM OF VIOLATION OF SECTION 501

 

(4)

THIS CASE DECLARES

” 26. The payments to Interrail, totaling $4,059,396, were never reviewed or authorized by the St. Louis Council’s delegate body as required by the UBC Constitution and/or the St. Louis

Council’s Bylaws”.

 

FIRST THERE IS NO ALLEGATION THAT BOND HID THESE EXPENDITURES FROM THE TRUSTEES OR DELEGATE BODY.TO THE CONTRARY THIS COMPLAINT REVEALS THAT 8 DELEGATES SEATED ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WERE MADE FULLY AWARE

 “At about the time that the Executive Committee approved the purchase of the Billboards”

“After the Executive Committee authorized the purchase of the billboards on January 20, 2021

 

AS PREVIOUSLY STATED THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE UNDER THE UBC CONSTITUTION OR THE COUNCIL BYLAWS DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER OR OBLIGATION TO APPROVE SHYTE.

 

WHAT IS RELEVANT IS THAT PER THE COUNCIL BYLAWS (8) MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ARE REQUIRED ALSO TO BE DELEGATES TO THE COUNCIL

“The Executive Committee shall consist of eight (8) elected members, as well as the President, Vice-President and the Executive Secretary-Treasurer. Each of the eight (8) elected members must be a Council delegate in order to hold his or her seat”

 

“26. The payments to Interrail, totaling $4,059,396, were never reviewed or authorized by the St. Louis Council’s delegate body as required by the UBC Constitution and/or the St. Louis Council’s Bylaws.”

 IT APPEARS 8 DELEGATES DID REVIEW AND APPROVE.WHY DID THEY NOT REPORT THEIR APPROVAL OR THESE EXPENDITURES TO THEIR FELLOW DELEGATES AS REQUIRED BY THE LMRDA.WHY HAVE THEY NOT BEEN SUED IN THIS CASE???WHY DID 8 DELEGATES NOT REPORT THAT BOND WAS ACTING ILLEGALLY IF HE WAS INDEED DOING SO

 

SECOND IT IS THE COUNCIL TRUSTEES OBLIGATION AND DUTY TO REVIEW AND PRESENT TO THE DELEGATE BODY.

“The Trustees shall audit all books and accounts of the Executive Secretary-Treasurer at least monthly and report their findings to the Council”

THERE IS NO ALLEGATION THAT BOND HID THESE EXPENDITURES FROM THE TRUSTEES. THE INTERRAIL DEAL ALLEGEDLY WENT ON FOR TWO YEARS WHY DID THE TRUSTEES FAIL TO REVIEW AND REPORT TO THE DELEGATES FOR TWO YEARS AND WHY HAVE THEY NOT BEEN SUED IN THIS CASE FOR BREACH UNDER 501.WHY IS GARY "THE YACHT PERINAR TRYING TO RECOVER 4 MILLION PLUS FROM BOND AND INTERRAIL INSTEAD FROM THE TRUSTEES BONDS AND LIABILITY POLICY'S

 

ONE SHOULD ALSO ASK IF ANY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS WERE ALSO COUNCIL TRUSTEES

 

(5)  

FOXPOINTE HORSESHYTE

"46. Any revenue generated under the Foxpointe Agreements would constitute Unrelated Business Income under the Internal Revenue Service Guidelines, which is inconsistent with the St. Louis Council’s, and Union’s, non-profit status and would therefore create an undesirable tax burden on the St. Louis Council and the Union."

 

THE UBC INTERNATIONALS AND COUNCILS ARE ROUTINELY ALLOWED TO VIOLATE THEIR NON PROFIT STATUS.THERE ARE SO MANY EXAMPLES WE DO NOT HAVE ROOM TO LIST THEM ALL HERE.THEY ARE ALSO ALLOWED TO CREATE DUMMY COMPANY'S SUCH AS PLACID  INVESTORS TO FUNNEL MILLIONS TO RUN FOR PROFIT OPERATIONS SUCH AS THE TRU HOTEL,JOBSITE STEEL FACTORY'S,AFFORDABLE MODULAR AND THE LEVEL CARE PHARMACY SCAM AND THEY ARE INCLUDING THIS BS AGAINST BOND.

MAYBE BOND SHOULD HAVE STARTED A DUMMY COMPANY FIRST??

 

(6)

PETTY CASH BS

 BOND IS ACCUSED OF USING COUNCIL MONEY FOR PERSONAL EXPENSES FOR TOTAL OF $ 6,774.06.SINCE THE REST IF THIS CASE IS CLEARLY BS ARE YOU TELLING ME  THEY ARE PURSUING A FEDERAL CASE FOR $6,774.06!! IF THESE ALLEGATIONS ARE TRUE THEY COULD HAVE RECOVERED THIS MONEY AT ONE OF THE UBCs KANGAROO TRIALS UNDER 14D OR SECTION 52

 

NOW ALMOST THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF THE $6,774.06 IS $4,514.00 FOR THEATRE TICKETS ALLEGEDLY USED BY BOND AND HIS WIFE.

 

“57. From 2018 through 2020 Bond caused approximately $4,514.00 in St. Louis Council assets to be paid to the Fox Theatre for season tickets. On information and belief, the Fox Theatre season tickets were used by Bond and his wife for their personal benefit.”

 

THESE LEGAL HACKS ARE CHARGING THAT THESE TICKETS WERE USED EXCLUSIVELY BY BOND AND HIS WIFE??HOWEVER LETS SEE IF THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT THESE SAME THEATRE TICKETS WERE USED BY OTHERS SUCH AS EX EST TERRY NELSON

 

HEY MOONEY YOU JERSEY HACK HOW ABOUT ANSWERING  FOR THE “OTHER” TICKETS BOUGHT BY THE COUNCIL AND WHO USED THEM

 

GOING BACK TO 2014 AND BEFORE ON THE COUNCILS LM2 ARE LISTED WHAT ARE CLEARLY LEGAL EXPENDITURES IN THE OPERATION OF A UNION

 BASEBALL TICKETS,FOOTBALL TICKETS AND HOCKEY TICKETS

 

IN 2020 THE COUNCIL SPENT ROUGHLY $150,000 ON KANSAS CITY ROYALS,ST LOUIS CARDINALS AND ST LOUIS BLUES TICKETS AS WELL AS OTHER SPORTING EVENTS.

WHO USED THEM? WHY ARE THEY NOT BEING SUED??

   

NOBODY IS DEFENDING ALBERT BOND.THE PURPOSE IS TO SHOW THIS CASE IS A BS FLUFF PIECE TO PRETEND THE UBC IS HOLDING BOND ACCOUNTABLE

 

BONDS CORRUPTION, THE MAJORITY OF WHICH IS NOT EVEN INCLUDED IN THIS CASE,HAS LONG SINCE BEEN EXPOSED BY UBC MEMBER JON GOULD 

 

THE FACT THAT DOUGLAS MCCARRON AND THE UBC INTERNATIONAL HAS CONDONED AND REFUSED TO STOP BONDS CORRUPTION FOR YEARS HAS BEEN PROVEN BY UBC MEMBER JON GOULD 

NOW BY THESE ALLEGATIONS, DESPITE HOW TRIVIAL, AND THE UBC INTERNATIONAL RECENT STATEMENTS ACCUSING BOND OF FINANCIAL MALFEASANCE STATEMENTS ANOTHER GLARING FACT HAS BEEN PROVEN.AT THE REQUEST OF THE UBC AND FOR PAYMENT BY THE UBC HIRED LEGAL HACKS PERJURED THEMSELVES IN FEDERAL COURT DECLARING IN PREVIOUS CASES BOND HAD DONE NO WRONG

 NOW BY THESE ALLEGATIONS, DESPITE HOW TRIVIAL, AND THE UBC INTERNATIONAL RECENT STATEMENTS ACCUSING BOND OF FINANCIAL MALFEASANCE STATEMENTS ANOTHER GLARING FACT HAS BEEN PROVEN.THESE PAID LEGAL HACKS AND UBC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES CONSPIRED TO SLANDER AND PERSECUTE YET  UBC MEMBER JON GOULD FOR EXPOSING UBC CORRUPTION.YET ANOTHER MEMBER VICTIMIZED  BY DOUG MCCARRONS CRIMINAL SYNDICATE