Friday, January 27, 2023

SHANLEYS STAR WITNESS DECLARES SHANLEY IS A LIAR IN SHAPIRO PERSECUTION LAWSUIT.HANG ON BOYS AND GIRLS THIS IS ABOUT TO GET GOOD


SHANELY AND DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON DECLARED SHAPIRO DEMANDED HER STAFF 

"FIX THE FUCKING VOTE". 

DAN HUTCHINS THE PERSON SHANLEY TOLD THE COURT GAVE HIM THAT EVIDENCE HAS NOW DECLARED THAT SHAPIRO NEVER SAID ANY SUCH THING

 


Plaintiffs’ attorney Shanley fabricated the statement “fix the fucking vote” attributed to
Hutchins. Shanley and the UBC have been repeating that mantra to tarnish Shapiro because she challenged Shanley’s directives and that of the UBC when she was the top decision maker for the
Regional Council


SHANLEY

 "Shapiro ordered the Council’s then-Director of Contract Administration to “fix
the fucking vote.” He did as he was told"

 

HUTCHINS DEPOSITION

Would you agree that what she did not say was, "Fix the fucking vote"?

·I would agree she did not use those exact words.

 

 HUTCHINS

 (By Ms. Mell)· Have you ever heard the phrase, "Fix the
 fucking vote" attributed to Evelyn Shapiro?
A· ·No.

 

 SHANLEY ALSO ACCUSED AND SUED JUAN SANCHEZ

 "Shapiro ordered the Council’s then-Director of Organizing to fix the vote. He attempted to fix the
vote by submitting false votes on behalf of members who had not yet voted"

 

 HUTCHINS DEPOSTION

Q· ·Do you have any knowledge that Shapiro ever ordered the council's director of organizing to fix any vote?

18· A· ·No, I am not aware.

 

WE ALSO HAVE AN INDEPENDENT CYBER SECURITY COMPANY DECLARING NOT ONLY DID SANCHEZ NOT DO IT BUT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO DO WHAT THEY ARE ACCUSING HIM OF
 

3 Conclusion

Prepared by:
Matt Durrin, Senior Cybersecurity Consultant, LMG Security

The report provided by Lynx is incomplete, inaccurate, and forensically unsound. Due to lack of data verification and integrity, it is impossible to determine whether data was manipulated prior to Lynx’s investigation. Based on inaccuracies in Lynx’s analysis and insufficient forensic artifacts LMG determined that the data and report offered no evidence that Sanchez committed voter fraud as alleged in the civil complaint.

 

 "meaning it would
require a minimum of three people in three separate locations capable of entering the
data at that speed and for that duration for this to have occurred manually during voting.
This is a major finding that was absent from Lynx’s report"

 

 AND LETS NOT FORGET TRASH BAG SHANLEYS "LATE NIGHT RENDEZVOUS" BULLSHYTE ATTEMPT TO DEFAME SHAPIRO AND SANCHEZ


 SHANLEY HAS TOLD THE FEDERAL COURT THAT EVELYN SHAPIRO, EX EST AND THE ONLY FEMALE ALLOWED IN THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE GOOD OLD BOYS CLUB, WAS TRADING "LATE NIGHT RENDEZVOUS" AS A REWARD TO HER ORGANIZING DIRECTOR JUAN SANCHEZ FOR ALLEGEDLY RIGGING A CONTRACT VOTE

 

  "It appeared that Shapiro wanted to return the favor to Sanchez for what he had done regarding the false TA#3 votes with a late night rendezvous"

 

DAN HUTCHINS ALSO TESTIFIED THAT HE RESIGNED UNDER THREAT FROM DAN "CROOKED TEETH" SHANLEY 

 


HUTCHINS DEPOSITION 

Q· ·Did somebody tell you they would bring charges against you if you didn't resign?
19· A· ·Yes.
20· Q· ·Who?
21· A· ·General counsel for the UBC.
22· Q· ·Who is that?
23· A· ·Dan Shanley.

 

 THE PENCIL NECK LITTLE SHYTE SHANLEY HAS A LONG WELL DOCUMENTED HISTORY OF "RESIGN OR ELSE" THREATS

MIKE MCCARRON

MIKE OLDS

SANDY MALONEY 

SHAPIRO

AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON

 

 

ANOTHER HIGHLIGHT IS HUTCHINS CLAIMS THAT DOUG TWEEDY DID NOT RETIREE VOLUNTARILY.MCCARRON FORCED HIM OUT. HUTCHINS TESTIFIED THAT TWEEDY  ALSO REFUSED TO SIGN A CBA AGAINST THE MEMBERS VOTE

8· Q· ·Do you know Doug Tweedy?

·9· A· ·Yes.

10· Q· ·Who is he?

11· A· ·He's the executive secretary-treasurer of the regional

12· · · council prior to Evelyn.

13· Q· ·And why did he leave?

14· A· ·He retired.

15· Q· ·What do you know about what precipitated his retirement

16· · · when he retired?

17· A· ·I believe he was asked to retire, but I never discussed

18· · · the details with him.

19· Q· ·And when you say "he was asked to retire," who--

20· A· ·He was asked to retire by the general president.

21· Q· ·Who was that?

22· A· ·Doug McCarron.

23· Q· ·And was it an overnight thing?

24· A· ·It was pretty sudden.

 

 11· Q· ·Do you know whether or not he was ever urged to forgo a vote and just sign it?

13· A· ·I know there was discussion around that, but, yeah.

14· Q· ·Did he oppose that?

15· A· ·Yeah.


AND HUTCHINS TESTIFIED SHAPIRO ALSO OPPOSED SIGNING THE CBA AGAINST MEMBERS VOTE

16· Q· ·And did Evelyn oppose that?

17· A· ·Yeah, we discussed it during this last 2020 vote a few times on just signing the agreement and getting it over with.It was just something that she didn't want to do.


NOW HERE IS A REAL KICKER

(1)DAN HUTCHINS WAS TOLD TO RESIGN OR FACE CHARGES.(2)DAN HUTCHINS ADMITS HE RIGGED CBA VOTES

SO WHY IS KENNON POTEAT THE UBC  LEGAL HACK AND SHIT STAIN FROM THE UBC LAW FIRM OF WILLIAMS AND CONNOLLY REPRESENTING DAN HUTCHINS!!!!!!

WHO IS PAYING FOR IT!!!!

 

HUTCHINS DEPOSITION

 Q· ·(By Ms. Mell)· Have you retained Mr. Poteat?
12· A· ·Yes

 

Q· ·(By Ms. Mell)· Have you explored whether or not you have a conflict of interest with representation by Mr. Poteat
who represents both the council and the UBC in this case?
 MR. SHANLEY:· Objection--
MR. POTEAT:· Objection; privileged.

 

Q· ·So did Dan Shanley give you Kennon Poteat's name to call or did Kennon Poteat reach out to you?
 A· ·They reached out to me.


 

WTF!!!!HONOR?INTEGRITY?ARE YOU FRIGGIN KIDDING ME!!



NOW LETS REVIEW SHANLEY'S SHILS LYNX INVESTIGATIONS 

 

 (1)ELECTIONS??WTF DO YOU MEAN ELECTIONS

 

WE HAVE LYNX DECLARING  IN ITS REPORT

 

 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

LYNX Insights and Investigations was retained by Shanley APC to conduct an investigation into a series of elections by the Western Washington members of the Pacific Northwest Council of Carpenters

     The purpose of the investigation was to identify any evidence of fraud in three elections related to Tentative Agreements negotiated by Northwest Carpenters Union on behalf of its members in Western Washington that were held in August, September and October of 2021.

NOW LETS STOP HERE AND ASK

ARE THESE PEOPLE AT LYNX COMPLETE IDIOTS OR WERE THEY TOLD TO  USE THIS FALSE LANGUAGE

 

 "an investigation into a series of elections"

"identify any evidence of fraud in three elections
related to Tentative Agreements"

THERE WAS NO ELECTION.THESE WERE VOTES ON COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS.THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS OF RIGGED UNION ELECTIONS.NEVER WAS.

NOBODY IS SO STUPID THAT THEY COULD CONFUSE A UNION ELECTION WITH VOTES ON COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS .SO WHICH IS IT? DUMB AS A BOX OF ROCKS OR ARE THEY USING THIS LANGUAGE TO BACK UP THE LIE SHANLEY TOLD TO THE FEDERAL COURT

 2. This case is about the history of repeated election vote rigging directed by
Shapiro, the former highest elected officer of the Regional Council

THERE WAS NOT THEN AND THERE IS NOT NOT NOW ANY ALLEGATIONS OF A RIGGED UNION ELECTION

 

 (2)RETAINED BY SHANLEY APC

WHO THE HELL IS DAN SHANLEY TO HIRE LYNX OR ANYBODY ELSE. HE IS NOT THE UBC INTERNATIONAL.HE IS NOT THE PACIFIC COUNCIL.HE IS A HIRED BITCH

DID THE UBC INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL SYNDICATE OR JIM SOCK PUPPET GLEASON REVIEW AND APPROVE HIRING THESE PEOPLE AND THE EXPENDITURES OF FUNDS TO PAY THEM  


(3) BILLING AND INVOICES

 THESE HIRED HANDS AT LYNX WERE PAID OVER $90,000 PLUS.

WHY ARE THE CHARGES BEING BILLED TO DECARLO AND SHANLEY AND NOT THE UBC INTERNATIONAL OR PACIFIC COUNCIL??WHY WERE THE INVOICES SENT TO DECARLO AND SHANLEY AND NOT THE UBC??

 


 

DEAR OLMS. BESIDES THESE QUESTIONS I AM SURE YOU WANT TO REVIEW THE PAYMENTS FROM THE UBC TO SHANLEY APC FOR THESE COSTS SO YOU CAN COMPARE TO THE INVOICES

 

 (4)WTF DO YOU MEAN "NOT VERIFIED"

 OVER $90,000 PAID TO LNYX TO RAILROAD SHAPIRO AND SANCHEZ AND LYNX DECLARES THAT THEY BASED THEIR ENTIRE REPORT ON RECORDS SUPPLIED BY SHANLEY AND DID NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY ANY OF IT !!!


 

 

 

 

MORE TO COME WE ARE JUST GETTING STARTED

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Here we go again…….

Another lawsuit due to Doug’s illegal and unethical behaviour to be settled at some point in the very near future with members money.

Once Team McMcarron concludes that they are going to lose out comes the members check book.

The only question will be how much will it take to make Shapiro happy and drop her suit. $5 million plus or minus seems like a good price to make all parties go home happy.
Throw in some cash to cover legal services and you can put a ribbon on this one.

Anonymous said...

Go 🦅

UBC Freedom of Speech Policy

UBC Freedom of Speech Policy
THIS BLOG CONTAINS WHAT THE UBC FEARS MOST.INFORMATION.THIS BLOG IS FOLLOWING THE COURT CASE IN THE PERSECUTION OF MIKE MCCARRON WITH DOCUMENTS FROM THE CASE DOCKET IN REAL TIME AS THEY ARE FILED. IT REVEALS HOW FAR THE UBC, DOUG MCCARRON AND THEIR HIGH PAID LAWYERS WILL GO TO DESTROY ANY MEMBER WHO TELLS HIM NO....COPYRIGHT BROTHERMIKEMCCARRON.COM 2013.