HEY BIG HEAD PETE RODRIGUEZ. ARE YOU REALLY THIS STUPID??WESTERN DISTRICT VP BIG HEAD PETE HAS DELCARED I CAN HAVE A SEAT AT AND ATTEND ANY UBC MEETING AT WHICH HE IS IN ATTENDANCE

         ALL YOU OTHER EX UBC MEMBERS SHOULD PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THIS ONE

 

 

BIG HEAD PETE. AKA SLOTH

 

I ASKED WESTERN DISTRICT VP PETE RODRIGUEZ THE FOLLOWING: 

HEY PETE. AS WESTERN DISTRICT VP CAN YOU SORT THIS OUR. FOR THE SPECIAL CALLED MEETINGS THE NOTICE DECLARES” "DUES CARDS WILL BE REQUIRED TO ATTEND MEETINGS". FOR WHAT PURPOSE??IS THE MEMBERSHIP SYSTEM DOWN AND THEY ARE TO BE USED AS A FORM OF CONFIRMING UBC MEMBERSHIP OR IF A MEMBER IS IN GOOD STANDING? CAN YOU CHECK WITH THE ATTORNEYS AND ASK IF REQUIRING A DUES CARD TO ATTEND A UNION MEETING IS LEGAL? CAN YOU ALSO POINT OUT THE SECTION OF THE UBC CONSTITUTION THAT ALLOWS SUCH A REQUIREMENT.

MEMBERS WHO ARE ALREADY IN TURMOIL OVER THE FORCED MERGERS AND LOOTING OF THEIR LOCALS ARE SCRAMBLING TO GET DUES CARDS, BECAUSE THEY DO NOT KNOW ANY BETTER, HAVE CALLED THE COUNCIL AND HAVE BEEN TOLD NO DUES CARDS AND "THEY CANNOT SEND THOSE OUT RIGHT NOW"??REALLY CANNOT SEND THOSE OUT???. THEY WERE ALSO TOLD “IF YOU HAVE A VALID DRIVERS LICENSE/ID AND KNOW YOUR UBC NUMBER THEY WILL ALLOW THAT". IS IT NOT TRUE THEY ARE NOT "ALLOWING" ANYTHING THEY HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO ACCEPT ID. THEY CANNOT REQUIRE A DUES CARD AS A CONDITION OF ENTERING A MEETING. THEY DO NOT NEED THEIR UBC NUMBER EITHER. ALL THEY NEED IS PROOF OF WHO YOU ARE AND THEY PLUG YOUR NAME IN THEIR SYSTEM JUST AS THEY HAVE ALWAYS DONE.

   WHEN ASKED TO CLARIFY IN WRITING ““IF YOU HAVE A VALID DRIVERS LICENSE/ID AND KNOW YOUR UBC NUMBER THEY WILL ALLOW THAT" BECAUSE THE WRITTEN NOTICE SAYS IN WRITING "DUES CARDS WILL BE REQUIRED TO ATTEND MEETINGS" THEY REFUSED. AS WESTERN DISTRICT VP CAN YOU JUMP ON THIS FOR THE MEMBERSHIP YOU SERVE...

 

    THIS WAS UP FOR 7 DAYS AND RODRIGUEZ REFUSED TO ANSWER.

 

TODAY HE "RESPONDED"

 

 I ALSO ASKED BIG HEAD PETE THE FOLLOWING:

HEY PETE. FOR THE RECORD. DO YOU CONDEMN THE ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT AGAINST GENERAL PRESIDENT MCCARRON IN CASE 2:20-CV-03146 FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT CALIFORNIA. DO YOU CALL FOR MCCARRONS RESIGNATION??FOR THE RECORD DO YOU CONDEMN THE RAMPANT SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION IN THE UBC AS REVEALED BY ALL THE COURT CASES.?

 

 

NOW BIG HEAD PETE BECAME VERY ANGRY, CALLED ME A TROLL, STILL REFUSED TO ANSWER AND BLOCKED ME.

       THE GOOD NEWS IS PETE HAS DECLARED I MAY ATTEND ANY MEETING HE IS AT!!!

PETE STATED "DON’T SWEAT THE BS- YOU SHOW UP TO A MEETING - INTRO YOURSELF TO ME AND I WILL MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A SEAT. LATER TROLL"   

AND HE ALSO STATED 

"LIKE I SAID IN THE OTHER POST YOU ARE TROLLING- INTRODUCE YOURSELF TO ME AT ANY MEETING I ATTEND YOU CAN HAVE A SEAT"

 

     NOW TO BE FAIR I HAVE DRAFTED A LETTER TO THE GENERAL PRESIDENT DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON TO CONFIRM PETE HAS THE POWER TO MAKE THIS CLAIM .THE UBC CONSTITUTION AND THE 14D LETTER I HAVE FROM DOUG MCCARRON SAYS NO BUT WE WILL SEE.

 NOT THE OFFICIAL LETTER I SENT TO MCCARRON BUT YOU GET THE SENTIMENT

 satire

 the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices,

   

THE UBC CONSTITUTION DECLARES:

 "THE GENERAL PRESIDENT AND GENERAL EXECUTIVE BOARD SHALL PRESERVE THE MEMBERSHIP RIGHTS OF THE MEMBERS OF AFFECTED LOCAL UNIONS, INCLUDING THEIR RIGHT TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN MEETINGS"

 

 "that the member will no longer be in good standing, will not be entitled to  a seat in any meetings of any Local Union or Council"

 

 "A member who owes three months’ dues or who has not squared his or her arrearage in full shall not be entitled to a seat, or office in any meetings of a Local Union or Council"

 

NOW WHAT I COULD NOT FIND WAS THE SECTION THAT DECLARED BIG HEAD PETE RODRIGUEZ CAN DECIDE WHO OR WHO CANNOT ATTEND MEETINGS 

SO PETE .INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW

ARE YOU WALKING ON YOUR  HANDS AND TALKING OUT YOUR ASS AGAIN