"THE PLANS VIOLATED VIOLATED ERISA BY ACTING IN THE INTERESTS OF THE UNION ON PLAN MATTERS"
JAY "CHILDERS" BRADSHAW
THE NORCAL CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR CALIFORNIA CARPENTERS AND ALL THE FUND TRUSTEES ARE BEING SUED FOR USING THE FUND AND SCREWING MEMBERS IN A DISPUTE WITH A SIGNATORY CONTRACTOR
UNDER ERISA FUND TRUSTEES HAVE A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO ACT ONLY IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE FUND AND FUND PARTICIPANTS AND NOT ALLOW THE UBC CRIMINAL SYNDICATE OR THEIR STOOGES LIKE BRADSHAW TO CONTROL THE FUNDS
YET ACROSS THE UBC LAND OF UBC OZ, DESPITE THE REGULATIONS DETAILED IN ERISA, THE EBSA AND DOL HAS ALLOWED THE RAT MCCARRON AND HIS UBC CRONIES TO SEIZE AND CONTROL FUNDS IN SUBORDINATE BODIES. THE EBSA AND DOL HAS ALLOWED THE RAT MCCARRON TO CONTROL THE FUNDS AND FACILITATE THE ICE CREAM CRAPPER MCCARRONS AGENDA OF FORCED MERGERS AND CONSOLIDATION SO MCCARRON CAN LOOT AND CONTROL
IN RETURN FOR MILLIONS IN POLITICAL PAYOFFS FEDERAL AGENCIES HAVE NOT ONLY REFUSED TO STOP THEM THEY HAVE FACILITATED THEIR CORRUPT ACTIONS
DESPITE THE REGULATIONS DETAILED IN ERISA THE EBSA AND DOL HAS ALLOWED THE RAT MCCARRON AND HIS UBC CRONIES TO DIVERT, IN MANY CASES BY FORCE,HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF FUND MONEY TO THE POS AT ULLICO
AS WE SEE IN THIS CASE THE UBC AND THEIR HAND PICKED RATS LIKE BRADSHAW ARE MORE THAN WILLING TO SACRIFICE MEMBERS TO ACHIEVE THEIR CORRUPTION
"The Plans, including the Health Care Plan refuses to accept and credit AFI’s fringe benefit contributions as required by Section 515 of ERISA"
" The Health Care Plan has notified Plaintiff and the Participants employed by AFI that Health Care Plan coverage ended on October 31, 2023 due to the fact that AFI is no longer signatory to the Carpenters Union CBA"
"The loss of the critical, employer-paid health insurance coverage under the Health Care Plan is because of fiduciary duty breaches by the Individual Defendants"
"Carpenters Union is refusing to negotiate a successor CBA with AFI and has unlawfully instructed Garcia and other carpenters employed by AFI not to workfor AFI, and to resign their employment with AFI to accept employment with other contractors who have existing CBAs with Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties
Conference"
Conference"
REGARDLESS OF THE YET UNDISCLOSED REASONS FOR THE DISPUTE WITH AFI THESE MORONS ARE REFUSING TO ACCEPT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FUND!!
REGARDLESS OF THE YET UNDISCLOSED REASONS FOR THE DISPUTE WITH AFI THESE MORONS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR UBC MEMBERS AND THEIR FAMILY'S LOSING COVERAGE!!
BULLSHIT!!!
INSTRUCTED CARPENTERS TO QUIT.ONE HAS WONDER WHAT THE NLRA HAS TO SAY ON THAT ISSUE
IF COURSE IT WILL NOT MATTER BECAUSE OF ALL THE AGENCIES THE NLRB IS THE MOST CORRUPT AND JEN ABRUZZO IS A UNION CRIMINAL SYNDICATE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR SELL OUT HACK
"Due to the Health Care Plan’s improper refusal to accept and credit AFI’s fringe benefit contributions as required by Section 515 of ERISA and the Health Care Plan, approximately 33 employees/Participants/Class Members have terminated their employment with AFI because of their concern regarding the imminent and actual loss of health care coverage.
MCCARRON AND HIS INTERNATIONAL CRONIES ALONG WITH THEIR LOCAL STOOGES LIKE THE RAT FRANK HAWK AND JAY BRADSHAW HAVE SEATED AND REMOVED FUND TRUSTEES TO GET CONTROL OF FUNDS TO FORCE THEM TO SERVE THE UNIONS INTEREST IN VIOLATION OF ERISA
LETS NOT FORGET THE MILLIONS THE UBC SPENT ON LEGAL FEES TO TRY AND FORCE THE UBC SELF PROCLAIMED RIGHTS TO SEAT AND REMOVE TRUSTEES AT THEIR DISCRETION TO STACK FUNDS WITH MORONS AND SUCK ASS THEY CONTROL IN
FUCHS VS ALLEN
CASE 1:02 CV 1552
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT N.D.NEW YORK
LETS HOPE A VICTORY IN THIS CASE OPENS THE DOORS TO GET ALL THEIR NASTY CORRUPT ARSES IN FEDERAL COURT
8 comments:
LETS GO!!!!
That’s a cat they don’t want out of the bag I’m surprised they want to litigate that, and put it on public record to be out there as a weapon against them. You don’t and never have to have been a signatory to pay into the Bennie’s
The union cannot tell any member to not work for a company at all. That in itself should be a charge filed through the corrupt DOL. Even if a company is months behind in benefit payments.
As far as I know per federal law a benefit fund cannot accept benefit payments from a contractor that isn’t signatory to CBA that stipulates such payments.
Not that matters much anyway. What I think does matter is that the trustees are on the hook for not acting in the best interest of the members. The trustees are on their own and personally liable for breaches of trust to each and every affected member. M They may even be required to pay for their legal representation.
To the Trustees/defendants: You did it to your self!! You screwed the members you are legally required to represent in exchange for a soft job and a big pay check. But now they are suing you abd what’s your defense?? Doug told me to do it?? I didn’t know that was legal?? Some jobs aren’t for no show hacks like your self and being a Trustee on a healthcare fund would be one of those jobs.
Here’s a concise legal review: if the plaintiffs case has merits it means your defense doesn’t. It’s one or the other!!
I hope the plaintiffs take you for everything you stole!!! Have a great day!!! Oh one last thing, what’s the temperature now???
Thanks for the input.Can you post the federal law. Under a PLA non Union contractors who are not signatory to a Union MUST contribute to the Union funds but they are not required to become signatory.One would think if any condition exists where the Union can accept contributions from non signatory's then they can accept voluntary contributions at anytime.But I am not a lawyer. In my humble opinion the purpose of a PLA, besides to extort workers and company's on behalf of a Union, is to FORCE the non Union to pay into the funds and not to force the funds to accept.
In this case the who the Union says is now non signatory seems to be obligated to pay per the CBA" "Section 47 of the CBA specifies that the Agreement and contribution
obligations continue after the termination date of the Agreement unless and until a
lawful impasse occurs or until a successor CBA is negotiated"
The funds can accept benefit payments via a PLA because that’s a legal agreement just like a CBA. So both make the payments possible. Not sure of the name and title of the law though, that’s always what I heard. For what that’s worth.
“ In this case the Union says is now non signatory seems to be obligated to pay per the CBA" "Section 47 of the CBA specifies that the Agreement and contribution
obligations continue after the termination date of the Agreement unless and until a
lawful impasse occurs or until a successor CBA is negotiated". I agree that this language of valid obligated continued payment.
As I see it, in simple terms, if the Plaintiffs have a case it’s because their charges have merit, and that means the defendants are Fu……..ed!! That’s all that matters!! Keep us posted and good work!!!
I believe under ERISA YOU MUST BE A SIGNATORY IN SOME FORM TO PURCHASE BENEFITS
Post a Comment