SPEAKING OF PETE RODRIGUEZ THE NEW SECOND VP !!!
TSK. TSK.. PETEY NOT ANOTHER LAWSUIT AGAINST THE UBC LEADERSHIP RATS WITH ALLEGATIONS OF WRONGFUL TERMINATION, SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION. THIS ONE HAS YOUR NAME ON IT.
HEY PETE ."WE ARE ALL OUT OF CAKE"
(1). IN FACT, THROUGHOUT PLAINTIFF’S EMPLOYMENT, EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS THROUGH THEIR SUPERVISORS CREATED AND SUBJECTED PLAINTIFF TO A HOSTILE AND ABUSIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT, CONSISTING OF HARASSMENT BASED ON GENDER AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION. FOR INSTANCE, EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS LEAD A MALE-DOMINATED WORKPLACE, AND AT GATHERINGS, THEY MADE ANNOUNCEMENTS, INCLUDING STATING, “YOU CAN HAVE CAKE OR COCK, AND WE’RE ALL OUT OF CAKE.
(2). THE HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT WAS FURTHER EXACERBATED WHEN EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS’ MANAGEMENT LEARNED PLAINTIFF WAS AWARE OF AN IMPROPER INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A HIGH-RANKING RANKING EXECUTIVE OF EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS AND ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER.
GOOD GOLLY. I WONDER WHO THE HIGH-RANKING RANKING EXECUTIVE WAS AND WHO APPOINTED HIM???
(3). THIS EXECUTIVE'S CONDUCT ESTABLISHED A QUID PRO QUO CULTURE WHERE SUBORDINATES REASONABLY BELIEVED THEY MUST TOLERATE OR ENGAGE IN INAPPROPRIATE RELATIONSHIPS TO ADVANCE PROFESSIONALLY, AS DEMONSTRATED BY: (1) THE EXECUTIVE'S UNIMPEDED CONTINUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP DESPITE BEING MARRIED; (2) THE KNOWN TERMINATION/DEMOTION OF EMPLOYEES WHO OPPOSED THE RELATIONSHIP;
(4) IN CLEAR RETALIATION FOR PLAINTIFF’S PROTECTED ACTIVITY, EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS THROUGH PETE RODRIGUEZ ABRUPTLY REVOKED PLAINTIFF’S LONG-STANDING REMOTE WORK AUTHORIZATION—A MATERIAL CHANGE TO HER EMPLOYMENT TERMS—AND DEMOTED HER, REDUCING HER PAY.
(5). RODRIGUEZ LED A CAMPAIGN TO HARASS PLAINTIFF OUT OF INTENTIONAL MEANNESS, BIGOTRY, AND/OR FOR OTHER PERSONAL MOTIVE.
SO LETS TAKE BETS. PAYOFF WITH A NON DISCLOSURE OR TRIAL.
MEMBERS BETTER GET OUT THEIR WALLETS....... NOT AGAIN!!!!
ONCE HER LAWYER HAS COPIES OF ALL THE OTHER CASES SHOWING A PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR THEY ARE DONE.
WHAT AMAZES ME IS THAT SO MANY OF THESE RATS IN UBC LEADERSHIP POSITIONS, STARTING WITHIN DOUGY MCCARRON CASE 2:20-CV-03146 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,HAVE BEEN ACCUSED IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS YET NO OUTCRY FROM THE SISTERS IN THE BROTHERHOOD, NO DEMAND FOR STRONGER POLICY’S AND ENFORCEMENT AND NO DEMANDS FOR ANYBODY’S RESIGNATION.
BY THE WAY BIG HEAD PETE. CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY AND HOW THE COUNCIL PAID ARTKORE, A CHICKEN SHYTE PRINTING OUTFIT IN LAS VEGAS, CLOSE TO $700,000 IN ONE YEAR.
11 comments:
It's like we are watching a real life "Animal Farm " play out in live time
This will be a seven figure settlement. How high it goes will be depend on the text messages and cell phone records. If the plaintiff has copies of embarrassing text messages from bucket head and or his minions that confirm the plaintiffs claims in vivid detail it could be a $3 million case.
The faster it settles the bigger the cash settlement will be.
Happy Labor Day!!
I hope she brings this SOB down, he is a bully, backstabber, lying prick. Unfortunately, they will try to pay her off. Big head Pete has been sleeping with Natalie Sanchez for over 10 years and now members dues are going to have to pay for his sins
So it goes in the UBC; rob, lie, cheat, steal, fail, and all at the expense of the member.
The UBC uses the same playbook coast to coast! When is enough enough? Fu(k!ng Bullies! It's gotta catch up to them soon!
Yup just ask the VP of Local 255 with his little secretary, crabby Bills neighbors kid. Nice hire Billy.
The following comment was made on another post. "Why doesn’t someone from the committee interview Mike McCarron? Mike knows everything about his rotten brother Doug. Remember, Doug got rid of his brother Mike over fabricated allegations, destroying his reputation and his career. It is clear, Mike McCarron knew too much about Doug’s dirty deeds and had to go." To expand on this let me ask. In my opinion why doesn't the lawyers for this case interview Mike McCarron in regards to the environment that exists at the Council and the UBC as a whole for female members and employees.I am sure the courts might be interested in some of Dougys, who himself has been accused of sexual harassment in Federal court, colorful names for female members and employees
Joe Byrne Marc Okun and Miguel Fuentes are blackballing Carmen Durso because he filed charges against the EST Joe Byrne and Marc Okun is destroying the Connecticut local to cover up the council and Miguel’s corruption and he is calling contractors and community partners to stop members from being gainfully employed abusing the power of the business Manager there will be more lawsuits filed
This is, unfortunately true. Marc Okun made it a point to reach out to my boss (the owner) to defame me, told them that I would put the company out of business and encouraged him to get rid of me after I solicited my own job. I’m a 35 year member of the UBC. Unfortunately it worked.
He then did this with the next contractor I worked for as well. And I have the proof in text messages.
Okie dokie is a rat. Bragged about working In Stamford even though he lives in Windsor LOL. That's because no one would hire him locally. And this is who the no show crew has in charge of CT? And all this while they endorse the wrong doings of Miguel??? I hope you get you're justice brother!
Well the foursome that played golf last week had fun. I hope the upcoming man hours at least reflect your score. Hey Mike R FOOOOOORE! How many mulligans did the members buy?
Post a Comment