LET THEM EAT CAKE!!!!OMG!!SAY IT AINT SO MICKEY!!!NOT ANOTHER LAWSUIT WITH ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL HARRASMENT AGAINST THE UBC LEADERSHIP.THIS TIME WITH THE NEW SECOND VP PETE RODRIGUEZS NAME ON IT

 

 

SPEAKING OF PETE RODRIGUEZ THE NEW SECOND VP !!!

 

TSK. TSK.. PETEY NOT ANOTHER LAWSUIT AGAINST THE UBC LEADERSHIP RATS WITH ALLEGATIONS OF WRONGFUL TERMINATION, SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION. THIS ONE HAS YOUR NAME ON IT. 

HEY  PETE ."WE ARE ALL OUT OF CAKE"

 

(1). IN FACT, THROUGHOUT PLAINTIFF’S EMPLOYMENT, EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS THROUGH THEIR SUPERVISORS CREATED AND SUBJECTED PLAINTIFF TO A HOSTILE AND ABUSIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT, CONSISTING OF HARASSMENT BASED ON GENDER AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION. FOR INSTANCE, EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS LEAD A MALE-DOMINATED WORKPLACE, AND AT GATHERINGS, THEY MADE ANNOUNCEMENTS, INCLUDING STATING, “YOU CAN HAVE CAKE OR COCK, AND WE’RE ALL OUT OF CAKE.

 

(2). THE HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT WAS FURTHER EXACERBATED WHEN EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS’ MANAGEMENT LEARNED PLAINTIFF WAS AWARE OF AN IMPROPER INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A HIGH-RANKING RANKING EXECUTIVE OF EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS AND ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER.

GOOD GOLLY. I WONDER WHO THE HIGH-RANKING RANKING EXECUTIVE WAS AND WHO APPOINTED HIM???

(3). THIS EXECUTIVE'S CONDUCT ESTABLISHED A QUID PRO QUO CULTURE WHERE SUBORDINATES REASONABLY BELIEVED THEY MUST TOLERATE OR ENGAGE IN INAPPROPRIATE RELATIONSHIPS TO ADVANCE PROFESSIONALLY, AS DEMONSTRATED BY: (1) THE EXECUTIVE'S UNIMPEDED CONTINUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP DESPITE BEING MARRIED; (2) THE KNOWN TERMINATION/DEMOTION OF EMPLOYEES WHO OPPOSED THE RELATIONSHIP;

(4) IN CLEAR RETALIATION FOR PLAINTIFF’S PROTECTED ACTIVITY, EMPLOYER DEFENDANTS THROUGH PETE RODRIGUEZ ABRUPTLY REVOKED PLAINTIFF’S LONG-STANDING REMOTE WORK AUTHORIZATION—A MATERIAL CHANGE TO HER EMPLOYMENT TERMS—AND DEMOTED HER, REDUCING HER PAY.

(5). RODRIGUEZ LED A CAMPAIGN TO HARASS PLAINTIFF OUT OF INTENTIONAL MEANNESS, BIGOTRY, AND/OR FOR OTHER PERSONAL MOTIVE.

 

SO LETS TAKE BETS. PAYOFF WITH A NON DISCLOSURE OR  TRIAL. 

MEMBERS BETTER GET OUT THEIR WALLETS....... NOT AGAIN!!!!

 ONCE HER LAWYER HAS COPIES OF ALL THE OTHER CASES SHOWING A PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR THEY ARE DONE.

WHAT AMAZES ME IS THAT SO MANY OF THESE RATS IN UBC LEADERSHIP POSITIONS, STARTING WITHIN DOUGY MCCARRON CASE 2:20-CV-03146 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,HAVE BEEN ACCUSED IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS YET NO OUTCRY FROM THE SISTERS IN THE BROTHERHOOD, NO DEMAND FOR STRONGER POLICY’S AND ENFORCEMENT AND NO DEMANDS FOR ANYBODY’S RESIGNATION.

BY THE WAY BIG HEAD PETE. CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY AND HOW THE COUNCIL PAID ARTKORE, A CHICKEN SHYTE PRINTING OUTFIT IN LAS VEGAS, CLOSE TO $700,000  IN ONE YEAR.

 TELL US ALL WHAT THEIR SPECIALTY PRODUCT IS AND HOW MUCH THE COUNCIL HAS SPENT ON THAT HORSESHYTE