PART 2 .. "SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE UNITED BROTHERHOOD" CONTINUED

 

SECTION 52 I OF THE CONSTITUTION THAT ALL UBC MEMBERS ARE BOUND BY DECLARES 

           THEN HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE!!!

  

  THERE IS ONLY ONE UBC CONSTITUTION.HOW CAN IT BE ENFORCED IN A DISCRIMINATORY MANNER.ONE CONSTITUTION BUT DIFFERENT  RULES? 

 

THE RULE IS ONLY INCLUDED IN THE CONSTITUTION AND IS AGGRESSIVELY ENFORCED AS A TOOL TO LIMIT MEMBERS ABILITY TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST UBC PERSECUTION CAMPAIGNS AND AS VICTIMS OF THE BS UBC KANGAROO TRIAL SYSTEM BUT NOT AGAINST CANADIAN MEMBERS???

 

SECTION 52 I

 The accused and the accuser may appear before the Trial Committee in person and/or by counsel (who shall be a member of the
United Brotherhood)

 

 MEMBERS ARE ROUTINELY DENIED THE RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY. 

LAWYERS HAVE SHOWED UP AT 14D AND OTHER UBC DOG AND PONY SHOWS TO REPRESENT MEMBERS BEING PERSECUTED AND DENIED ENTRY BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT UBC MEMBERS  

 

AT THE CORRUPT SHYTE SHOW THAT IS THE NYC COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE RECENTLY BEING INTERROGATED BY AN ARROGANT LITTLE PEACOCK NAMED RICHARD GREEN.  

 RICHARD GREEN IS A HIRED HAND AT THE COUNCIL AND NOTHING MORE YET IS PRETENDING TO BE A REAL COP COMPLETE WITH FAKE BADGES HE BOUGHT AT TOYS R US. GREEN AND HIS CRONIES HAVE DENIED MEMBERS RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY DURING THESE INTERROGATIONS   

 

 

 MIKE MCCARRONS CASE IS A REVEALING LOOK AT THE UBC AGENDA TO LIMIT MEMBERS ABILITY TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST UBC PERSECUTION CAMPAIGNS AND AS VICTIMS OF THE BS UBC KANGAROO TRIAL SYSTEM

  MIKE MCCARRON WAS ALSO A VICTIM OF THE "SHALL BE A UBC MEMBER" SCAM

 

 WHEN MIKE MCCARRONS DAUGHTER MICHELE, WHO IS A LAWYER, TRIED TO JOIN THE UNION SHE WAS DENIED 

SHE COULD HAVE AND COULD QUALIFIED UNDER THE RULE AND COULD HAVE APPEARED FOR MIKE MCCARRON .

AS A MATTER OF FACT THE UBC SENT OUT A NOTICE ACROSS THE UBC LAND OF OZ TO DENY MICHELE MCCARRON THE RIGHT TO JOIN THE UBC AT ANY LOCATION

                   

 PAY ATTENTION TO LITTLE TYKES CURTIS MORGAN'S ARE YOU A CARPENTER BS

  SECTION 7 OF THE CONSTITUTION  CLAIMS PROFESSIONS FROM ASTRONAUTS TO HEALTH CARE WORKERS

ALSO ASK YOURSELF WHY CURTIS MORGAN WAS EVEN THERE

  

HEY DOUGY. WAS YOUR LAWYER JOHN DECARLO COLLECTING A UBC PENSION.ARE DANNY BOY SHANLEY AND HIS CREW OF MISFIT TOYS IN THE INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND??

 

 

THE POINT IS THAT IT IS LONG PAST TIME FOR MEMBERS TO TAKE THIS "SHALL BE A MEMBER OF THE UBC"BS RESTRICTION TO COURT

ALBERTA LABOR LAW DECLARES:

  Section 26 of the Alberta Labour Relations Code, "a trade union is legally barred from expelling, suspending, or disciplining a member for reasons other than a failure to pay standard dues, unless that member has been:
• (c) Afforded a full and fair hearing, including the right to be represented by counsel..."

 

 THE LMRDA 29 U.S.C. § 411(a)(5)DECLARES

(5) Safeguards against improper disciplinary action

No member of any lab or organization  may be fined, suspended, expelled, or otherwise disciplined except for nonpayment of dues by such organization or by any officer thereof unless such member has been (A) served with written specific charges; (B) given a reasonable time to prepare his defense; (C) afforded a full and fair hearing.

 NOTICE BOTH CANADIAN AND US LABOR LAW READ ALMOST THE SAME MINUS THE SINGLE PHRASE

 "including the right to be represented by counsel"

 

 I AM SURE THE CREATORS OF THE LMRDA DID NOT INCLUDE IT BECAUSE COMMON SENSE TOLD THEM IN WASN'T NEEDED

I AM ALSO SURE THEY NEVER ANTICIPATED THAT A PUNK LIKE CASH MCCARON, WHO IS A SCOURGE ON ORGANIZED LABOR AND AN ENEMY TO UBC MEMBERS, WOULD EVER BE ELECTED TO ANYTHING BUT DOG CATCHER

 

  !!!!WARNING.THE FOLLOWING PICTURE MIGHT SCARE THE CRAP OUT OF SMALL CHILDREN!!! 

 HEY DOUGY. HOW MANY MORE LUMPS WILL YOU HAVE TO GROW BEFORE YOU HANG IT UP???WHAT A GREAT HALLOWEENIE COSTUME 

 IN MY HUMBLE OPINION THE INFORMATION THAT THE RULE IS NOT AND CANNOT BE ENFORCED IN CANADA ON CANADIAN MEMBERS COULD POSSIBLY SERVE THE MEMBERSHIP AS A WHOLE

 WITH EVIDENCE OF THE DISCRIMINATORY ENFORCEMENT PUT BEFORE A JUDGE PERHAPS IT WILL MAKE A STRONG CASE FOR THE COURTS TO END "THIS SHALL BE A MEMBER" BS

 

  FOR THE RECORD NOBODY IS NAIVE. 

AT ANY UBC 14D DOG AND PONY SHOW OR A COUNCIL KANGROO TRIAL

 (1)THE VERDICT HAS ALREADY BEEN DECIDED

(2) AS DECLARED BY FEDERAL CONSENT COURT MONITOR DENNIS WALSH IN NYC....UBC TRIAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS ARE TO STUPID TO BE ON ANY TRIAL COMMITTEE OR MAKE A RULING.

THE STOOGES WOULD BE CLUELESS IN REGARDS TO ANY LEGAL ARGUMENT A REAL LAWYER WOULD MAKE.

 

BUT IN MY OPINION THE PRESENCE OF A REAL LAWYER IN THE ROOM IS WORTH THE FEAR FACTOR.I MEAN WHAT ARE THEY SO AFRAID OF 

ALSO IN MY OPINION A REAL LAWYER IN THE ROOM WOULD MAKE THESE UBC STOOGES CRAP IN THEIR DIAPER 

   WOW!  THIS IS THE SAME REACTION THAT THE UBC LEADERSHIP AND ALL THEIR STOOGES HAVE WHEN ASKED TO TAKE AN IQ TEST

 

I AM SURE IT WOULD MAKE UBC STOOGES LIKE TWEEDLE DEE MIKE DRAPER HESITATE TO COMMIT ACTS SUCH AS COERCING A WITNESS TO CHANGE HIS TESTIMONY AS HE DID WITH PETER AYLWARD IN THE 14D DOG AND PONY SHOW OF MIKE MCCARRON 

 

THEN WE HAVE ALL THE RECENT EXPOSURE SHOWING HOW WORTHLESS AND WHAT A FAILURE OUR FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM IS 

 

WE HAVE FEDERAL JUDGES TO STUPID TO BE JUDGES

 WE HAVE FEDERAL JUDGES USING THE BENCH TO PURSUE THEIR OWN POLITICAL AGENDAS

 WE HAVE FEDERAL JUDGES USING THE BENCH TO MAKE RULINGS ON DEMAND IN RETURN FOR FAVORS AND OR CASH  

 IT MAY BE AN UPHILL BATTLE BUT IT IS LONG PAST TIME TO PUT AN END TO THIS SLAP IN THE FACE OF JUSTICE

  

HEY EX FEDERAL JUDGE ALFRED  LOUNGO 

 "The right to be represented by counsel, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, does not apply to hearings before labor unions."