DOUGY SENDS NOBODY COLORADO LAP DOG AND UBC HACK JIM GLEASON TO TRY TO INTIMIDATE CONCERNED UBC MEMBERS.MEMBERS HAVE EXHAUSTED THEIR INTERNAL REMEDIES AND WILL FILE MORE CHARGES WITH THE OLMS
MCCARRON HAS REFUSED FOR TWO MONTHS TO ANSWER THE MEMBERSHIP
MAY 3,2019
Douglas J McCarron
Douglas J McCarron
General President
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners
101 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington DC 2001
President McCarron,
We,
the undersigned members in good standing of the UBC, demand you and the UBC
International conduct an internal investigation into the allegations of
corruption; self-dealing; violations under the UBC Constitution; violations
under the LMRDA and violations under ERISA, listed in the Ballantyne lawsuit,
Superior Court of New Jersey Essex County, Docket #L-007232-18. In particular,
but not limited to, the allegations against Frank Spencer and Michael Capelli,
who you recently promoted. Regardless, of any “deal” the UBC made with John
Ballantyne, the allegations of corruption against Spencer and Capelli did not
go away. Some of the allegations made by Ballantyne have already been proven
with a simple review of UBC financial documents. Therefore, we as members of
the UBC also question your choice of promoting Spencer and Capelli.
INSTEAD HE SENDS A UBC LAP DOG TO HARASS MEMBERS AND MAKE DEMANDS FOR INFORMATION THE UBC CLEARLY SHOULD ALREADY HAVE.UBC HACK JIM GLEASON FIRST MADE HARASSING PHONE CALLS TO UBC MEMBERS WHICH WAS A CLEAR ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE. MEMBERS TELL GLEASON TO PISS OFF.
GLEASON FOLLOWED UP WITH A DEMAND LETTER WHEN MEMBERS LAUGHED AT LITTLE JIMMY FAUNTLEROY TRYING TO INTIMIDATE ANYBODY AND TOLD HIM TO PISS OFF
GLEASON LIES IN WRITTEN RESPONSE
"YOU HAVE FAILED AND REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE UBC"
GLEASON LIES IN WRITTEN RESPONSE
"YOU HAVE FAILED AND REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE UBC"
ACTUALLY LITTLE JIMMY FAUNTLEROY IT IS CLEAR ALL MEMBERS DID WAS TELL YOU GO POUND SALT.
GLEASON TAKES EXCEPTION TO THE MEMBERS HE WORKS FOR "DEMANDING"
PERHAPS THIS WILL HELP YOU GLEASON BECAUSE IT IS CLEAR YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND ENGLISH
MEMBERS DECLARE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
"It is apparent the UBC has not investigated, or is not willing to investigate the allegations defined in the John Ballantyne vs Frank Spencer, Mike Capelli lawsuit, Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, Docket #L-007232-18, as requested by several concerned UBC carpenters".
June 26,
2019
Doug
McCarron
United
Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
101
Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington,
DC 20001
Doug
McCarron,
It
is apparent the UBC has not investigated, or is not willing to investigate the
allegations defined in the John Ballantyne vs Frank Spencer, Mike Capelli
lawsuit, Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, Docket #L-007232-18, as
requested by several concerned UBC carpenters. If this statement is not true,
you are certainly not willing to provide answers to our request.
For
you to assign Jim Gleason to contact our group of concerned UBC carpenters is
nothing more than a diversion from our point. It seems Gleason has more
interest with investigating me than answering the clearly spelled out demands
within the May 3, 2019 letter to you. Continuing to state our requested position
to you, to investigate, or provide evidence of your investigation’s results, of
the allegations listed within the John Ballantine lawsuit appear to be
fruitless.
The
UBC settling with John Ballantyne, for an undisclosed amount, at the very least
appears to be a cover up. Where is the transparency? What was John Ballantyne’s
settlement amount? Transparent transactions are part of principal policy for
any labor organization. What are you hiding from the membership?
We,
the concerned UBC carpenters will not continue to participate in your typical
UBC runaround, orchestrated by your UBC attorneys, DeCarlo and Shanley. We will
file a complaint with the Department of Labor, asking for the department to get
to the bottom of John Ballantynes’ allegations against Frank Spencer, Mike
Capelli, and you.
____________________________
Lindsey
Maldoon, UBC Carpenter
COPY: US Attorney’s Office, New Jersey
The United States
Department of Labor Office, OLMS
The United States
Department of Labor Office, EBSA
17 comments:
And so it begins. There ARE many of us who ARE intimate with this case. I find it curious gleason tried to call and intimidate individuals not even in the council that it happened. By design?
Oh well. They had their chance. Now its in the hands of auditors and forensic accountants.
Perhaps a bar association complaint too against the unethical scumbags " covering " for them under the guise of jurist prudence.
Shanley and decarlo are known liars. Perhaps the bar might want to investigate them to.
Scorched earth coming.
And there it is in its full glory.
The ubc leadership in its arrogance and disdain for its own members.
Gleason , at the behest of McCarron just displayed exactly who stupid these men are.
Mr Gleason. Let me make this clear.
You perhaps received legal counsel which the members paid for, from Shanley and DeCarlo. If this was their advice: to call and harass members than once again you pissed members monies away.
Lets be clear. Without membership dues, you dont have a salary. Non of you.
That being said. Let me help you out.
1. It is not the ubc members respinsibility to " provide" you with information.
Idiot.
John Ballantyne made a 14 page list of charges that merited a nj superior court hearing.
Balantyne than took a " settlement" north of 6 million dollars ( again MEMBERS MONIES) to go away.
Just because he dropped the charges does not indicate innocence or guilt on cappeli, spencer, and mccarrons part.
The charges are there.... So is the pay off.
We want to know. Did doug mccarron investigate it further within the ubc before promoting the other 2 ?
Thats a realll easy question.
If so. We demand to see the documentation. If not we want to know why.
You have NO business talking to any member and requesting information because the information is quite clear.
2. Your stupidity is seemingly boundless in calling a member to ask what they know. They dont need to know anything except if there was an investigation internally and how much of our money did you spend on ballantyne , court fees, attorneys and other payoffs.
Again MEMBERS MONIES.
Answer the fucking letter that was written appropriately and filed through the proper protocol.
The bigger issue in this for the feds that may be reading it:
The George Norcross III connection.
The fact that trish mueller was " forced " upon the nrcc as political action director, paid for by MEMBERS MONIES, was a combination of norcross pacs with nrcc pacs.
You want to find the criminal activity. Look at muellers moneylaundering with marita crawford of lu 98 electricians pac director.
This allllll ties together and norcross was the puppet master.
Again alll at the expense of hard working carpenters monies.
Our healthcare, our ability to vote for our own destiny has alll been corrupted.
Mueller is the connection to sweeney.
Mueller is the connection to pa sup court justice kevin dougherty.
Mueller is the connection to almost every judge in camden, gloucester, burlington, and ocean county in nj.
Mueller is the connection to mayor jim kenney in phila.
Mueller by the command of norcross is the link to allll of this.
Do your jobs.
If i can link it all together , surely with your subpeonea power and resources can figure this out.
Perhaps its time for another jimmy boyo hacker hocker update?
So hypothetically at the next 158 meeting , igor carsillo will say " next , a report from our financial secretary"
And in that report there will be line items outlining the exact cost of a trip to vegas and a trip to new york by the bumbling illiterate known as wonder boy james hocker , to attend 2 lavish retirement parties ( both parties for the same 2 douchebags )
Soo will those expenses be listed ?
Also will the plastic surgeons bill to repair the stretchmarks around jimmys mouth be included?
I mean it was obviously important events for him to attend .... Ya know... For the members.
We all see how dedicated he is to the membership and the council reps right. Ohh wait. Sorry. Me. Me. Me.
Drink up jimmy boyo.
At least mike hand had the decency not to waste members monies on this knob slobbering event.
In the end. When you piss off and on alllll those who helped you ....you are left with no place to piss.
Doug McCarron is trapped, if he investigates Spencer and Capelli like he should he Will be implicated in all kinds Of criminal activity, Spencer has so much dirt on McCarron. This is getting very interesting stay tuned. Lots of things happening in the next few months goodbye Douglass!
we really need to think about a class action lawsuit against the illegal fines giving to our members for not performing their mups hey lets not forget the only ones that don't get paid are us the organizers get paid the banner employees get paid its on their lm with the government paid employees not carpenters banner employees im not a lawyer but it seems very discrimatory don't you think is it an activity or a job I guess its who you ask on the line some get paid some don't I think this can be won in court
The legal problem with the MUP is not who gets paid vs who doesn’t. One of the primary problems is that the MUP is violation of one’s First Amendment right to “freedom of association”, which provides one the right to support who they want how they want. So telling a member that they have to participate in a MUP event that they don’t support is a violation of this First Amendment right. The next legal violation is compelling members to support political candidates with their time and money without their consent and approval. Another legal challenge for the MUP is the manner in which it was approved, by the Delegates to Council by a Voice vote, not by the members casting a secret ballot at a special called meeting. You can’t be excluded from work, your dues can’t be rejected, and the Union can’t tell your employer to lay you off for failure to all Union dues. The MUP is now functionally useless.
The problem lies with our union and our union representation. If we were proud members of a so-called union, then the members would participate with no problems. That being said, our union representation continues to lie to the members on a daily basis, instead of being upfront and truthful. As far as I’m concerned I wouldn’t help one of our business representatives out in no way and I mean none of them until they grow a set of balls and do what’s right for the members. Take a look at James Hocker. He goes to these extravagant balls And parties meanwhile knowing damn right well that the members money is paying for his trips. You don’t see Mike Hand taking advantage of these situations do you? But Mike Hand also is not sticking up for the members by continuing to lie and deceive the members on a daily basis mean while collecting a nice fat paycheck knowing damn right well that that is our money, members work hard every day pay our dues for them to ride around in a new SUV with air-conditioning go on lavish trips. All of our representatives down here in Philadelphia should be ashamed of their selves . I don’t know how they could sleep at night knowing what is going on in our brotherhood.
And now. It needs to be mailed to every member with it listed specifically.
They spend our money sending a bazillion mups lettters out they can spend the money now to inform every member of their shameful lie and deceit.
The fact that they are still walking on the green side of the turf is a testament to our patience and effort to legitimately use the process without lies.
In my opinion. Every council rep should be fired and expelled for this.
Over 2 months now. No response to the letter that was filed and presented through proper channels using the ubc constitional laws and protocol..
The lack of response.. Is in violation.
You have all read the lack of transparency.
Here is a perfect example.
There were at least 4 federal agencies whos dutys are to be oversight to this activity were included on that letter.
Have any of them pursued this?
Did you send your letter via certified mail return receipt requested?
Of course. There were 4 federal agencies " cc d" on the document.
All 4 received it.
Hey! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website
with us so I came to take a look. I'm definitely enjoying the information. I'm book-marking and will be tweeting this to
my followers! Excellentt blog and excellent design.
UBC pussies should not try to to be scary
I know this if off topic but I'm looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what
all is required to get setup? I'm assuming having a blog like yours would cost a
pretty penny? I'm not very internet smart so I'm not 100% sure.
Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks
This is a topic that is near to my heart...
Cheers! Exactly where are your contact details though?
Post a Comment