WHY YES YOUR HONORS.WE CAN SPELL M.O.T.I.V.E

HOW MUCH WOULD DECARLO AND SHANLEY HAVE LOST IF THEY HAD BEEN SUCCESSFULLY FIRED BY MIKE MCCARRON FOR BEING PUNKS AND FOR FAILING TO PROPERLY PERFORM THEIR LEGAL OBLIGATIONS TO THE TRAINING FUND THAT RESULTED IN THE $6 MILLION DOLLAR PROBLEM WITH THE LEASES

  

FUNNY YOU SHOULD ASK

 NOW THIS CHICKEN DICK

JOHN DECARLO 

 AND HIS LAW FIRM ARE STILL TRYING TO BLAME MIKE MCCARRON WITH MORE FALSE COURT FILINGS IN ITS ONGOING PERSECUTION CAMPAIGN OF MIKE MCCARRON FOR ATTEMPTING TO FIRE THEIR ASS 

NOW OLMS IF YOU ARE STILL READING THIS IS FOR YOU

AN ATTEMPT TO FIRE A LAW FIRM FOR INCOMPETENCE AND FOR FORGETTING THEY WORK FOR THE COUNCIL AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND APPEARS TO BE A JUSTIFICATION FOR A TRUSTEESHIP UNDER THE LMRDA AND CONSIDERED TO BE "THREATENING AND INTIMIDATION" ACCORDING TO THE OLMS

 "The trusteeship letter also raised other
allegations, such as the threatening and intimidation of the UBC general counsel"

 UMM.HEY OLMS.

I AM SURE THE AGENT MEANT THE COUNSEL FOR THE SWRCC CORRECT??WHO GIVES A RATS ASS THAT DECLARO IS GENERAL COUNSEL FOR THE UBC. I MEAN IS THE OLMS INDICATING THE SWRCC AND UBC ARE NOT COMPLETELY SEPARATE ENTITIES FREE OF EACH OTHERS CONTROL AS DECAROL AND SHANLEY SWORE TO IN FEDERAL COURT

SO FIRING A HIRED HAND IS JUSTIFICATION FOR A TRUSTEESHIP?? OR PERHAPS IT WAS THE LUNCHES AND DINNERS DIRTY DOUG AND DECALRO HAD WITH SETH HARRIS.I MEAN WHAT WAS HE DOING HAVING LUNCH WITH THE UBC BOYS HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATING

 SO THE QUESTION IS HOW MUCH. HOW MUCH DOES DECARLO AND SHANLEY BLEED FROM JUST THE SWRCC EACH YEAR

THE ANSWER.A WHOLE SHYTELOAD.ENOUGH FOR MOTIVE TO ENGAGE IN A PERSECUTION CAMPAIGN AGAINST MIKE MCCARRON? YOU BETCHA .

LETS COUNT 

LEGAL WORK FOR THE SOUTHWEST COUNCIL ALONE

 $1,455,120

 SWRCC HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND

$601,204

SWRCC VACATION TRUST

$221,256 

SWRCC PENSION FUND

$413,243

SWRCC TRAINING FUND

$244,241 

YES YOUR HONORS THERE IS MORE BUT HERE IS $2,915,604  WORTH OF MOTIVE

NOW ALSO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE SWRCC IS DECARLO AND SHANLEYS POWER BASE. WHEN DIRTY DOUG AND DECLARO WANT TO SWAP SPIT THEY CAN RUN OVER TO DOUGYS HOUSE.  WHEN THEY WANT TO HOLD SECRET LUNCHS/MEETINGS TOGETHER WITH SETH HARRIS THEY CAN DO SO WITH EASE.WHEN DIRTY DOUG WANTS TO SUPPLY A LAWYER FOR HIS DAUGHTERS DIVORCE AS HE DID WITH DESMOND LEE OR TO HIS MOTHER AS HE DID WITH JOHN DECALRO DURING THE ULLICO SCANDAL. THERE THEY ARE. THEY SHARE THE SAME BUILDING WITH THE SWRCC ON FREEMONT AVE.DO WE NEED TO ADD UP THE EXPENSE TO THE DECARLO  LAW FIRM IF THEY WERE FIRED AND EXPELLED FROM THE SWRCC BUILDING?? FROM A NEW OFFICE TO NEW BUSINESS CARDS.ADD THIS TO THE 3 MILLION AND SEE IF YOU GET M.O.T.I.V.E

SOON WE WILL SHOW YOU HOW MUCH DECARLO AND SHANLEY ARE BLEEDING FROM UBC MEMBERS IN LEGAL FEES ACROSS THE ENTIRE UBC FROM NEW ENGLAND TO CALIFORNIA. WE WILL REVISIT THE LAWSUIT A NY FUND HAD TO FILE AGAINST DIRTY DOUG MCCARRON WHEN HE TRIED TO FORCE THEM TO FIRE THEIR LEGAL COUNSEL AND PUT ON DECARLO AND SHANLEY 

COMING NEXT. 

WHY DID DECARLO AND SHANLEY  FAIL TO ADVISE THE SWRCC TRAINING FUND TRUSTEES THEY WERE LEGALLY OBLIGATED BY ERISA TO REVIEW LEASES EVERY 3 YEARS AND RENEGOTIATE THEM TO ACCOMMODATE  MARKET FLUCTUATIONS.

SINCE BEING ADVISED BY THE EBSA OF THIS OBLIGATION IN THE SWRRC 2013 EBSA TRAINING FUND AUDIT,PROMPTED BY THEFT FROM THE TRAINING FUND FOR LAVISH PARTIES AND GIFTS, PRODUCE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE UBC ALERTED ALL FUNDS OF THIS OBLIGATION . 

HOW MANY OTHER UBC FUNDS THAT WERE NOT AUDITED HAVE NEVER CONDUCTED 3 YEAR REVIEWS AND ARE BEING ALLOWED BY THE UBC TO CONTINUE  OVERPAYING.

HEY EBSA I AM SURE YOU WANT TO ANSWER THIS ONE.CINCH UP YOUR LOINS.WE ARE GOING TO BE ASKING YOU FOR DOCUMENTATION

HEY DECARLO YOU SPINDLE DICK OLD CLOWN. WE ARE GOING TO LOOK FOR THOSE REVIEWS ...